NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Formation and Organization
We are an independent retail energy services company that provides residential and commercial customers in competitive markets across the United States with an alternative choice for natural gas and electricity. Spark Energy, Inc. (the "Company") is a holding company whose sole material asset consists of units in Spark HoldCo, LLC (“Spark HoldCo”). The Company is the sole managing member of Spark HoldCo, is responsible for all operational, management and administrative decisions relating to Spark HoldCo’s business and consolidates the financial results of Spark HoldCo and its subsidiaries. Spark HoldCo is the direct and indirect owner of the subsidiaries through which we operate. We conduct our business through several brands across our service areas, including Electricity Maine, Electricity N.H., Major Energy, Provider Power Massachusetts, Respond Power, Spark Energy, and Verde Energy.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis and include all wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. We account for investments over which we have significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.
In the opinion of the Company's management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary to fairly present the financial position, the results of operations, the changes in equity and the cash flows of the Company for the respective periods. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed.
Subsequent Events
Subsequent events have been evaluated through the date these financial statements are issued. Any material subsequent events that occurred prior to such date have been properly recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Relationship with our Founder and Majority Shareholder
W. Keith Maxwell, III (our "Founder") is the owner of a majority of the voting power of our common stock through his ownership of NuDevco Retail, LLC ("NuDevco Retail") and Retailco, LLC ("Retailco"). Retailco is a wholly owned subsidiary of TxEx Energy Investments, LLC ("TxEx"), which is wholly owned by Mr. Maxwell. NuDevco Retail is a wholly owned subsidiary of NuDevco Retail Holdings LLC ("NuDevco Retail Holdings"), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Electric HoldCo, LLC, which is also a wholly owned subsidiary of TxEx.
On November 2, 2020, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Company appointed W. Keith Maxwell III, who had served as our interim Chief Executive Officer since March of 2020, as Chief Executive Officer.
We enter into transactions with and pay certain costs on behalf of affiliates that are commonly controlled by Mr. Maxwell, and these affiliates enter into transactions with and pay certain costs on our behalf. We undertake these transactions in order to reduce risk, reduce administrative expense, create economies of scale, create strategic alliances and supply goods and services among these related parties.
These transactions include, but are not limited to, employee benefits provided through the Company’s benefit plans, insurance plans, leased office space, certain administrative salaries, management due diligence, recurring management consulting, and accounting, tax, legal, or technology services. Amounts billed under these arrangements are based on services provided, departmental usage, or headcount, which are considered reasonable by management. As such, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include costs that have been incurred by the Company and then directly billed or allocated to affiliates, and costs that have been incurred by our affiliates and then directly billed or allocated to us, and are recorded net in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding accounts receivable—affiliates or accounts payable—affiliates, respectively, recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, the Company enters into transactions with certain affiliates for sales or purchases of natural gas and electricity, which are recorded in retail revenues, retail cost of revenues, and net asset optimization revenues in the consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding accounts receivable—affiliate or accounts payable—affiliate in the consolidated balance sheets. The allocations and related estimates and assumptions are described more fully in Note 15 "Transactions with Affiliates."
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of all unrestricted demand deposits and funds invested in highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less. The Company periodically assesses the financial condition of the institutions where these funds are held and believes that its credit risk is minimal with respect to these institutions.
Restricted Cash
As part of the acquisition of residential customer equivalents (“RCEs") from Starion Energy, Inc., Starion NY Inc. and Starion Energy PA Inc. (collectively "Starion") in 2018, we funded an escrow account, the balance of which is reflected as restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the balance in the escrow account related to the Starion acquisition was zero and $1.0 million, respectively. Approximately $1.0 million was released to the seller in July 2020. Less than $0.1 million was released to the Company in December 2020 pursuant to a final settlement agreement with the seller.
Inventory
Inventory consists of natural gas used to fulfill and manage seasonality for fixed and variable-price retail customer load requirements and is valued at the lower of weighted average cost or net realizable value. Purchased natural gas costs are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations, within retail cost of revenues, when the natural gas is sold and delivered out of the storage facility using the weighted average cost of the gas sold.
Customer Acquisition Costs
The Company capitalizes direct response advertising costs that consist primarily of hourly and commission-based telemarketing costs, door-to-door agent commissions and other direct advertising costs associated with proven customer generation in its balance sheet. These costs are amortized over the estimated life of a customer.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the net customer acquisition costs were $6.1 million and $18.5 million, respectively, of which $5.8 million and $8.7 million were recorded in current assets, and $0.3 million and $9.8 million were recorded in non-current assets. Amortization of customer acquisition costs was $13.9 million, $18.5 million, and $24.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Customer acquisition costs do not include customer acquisitions through merger and acquisition activities, which are recorded as customer relationships.
Recoverability of customer acquisition costs is evaluated based on a comparison of the carrying amount of such costs to the future net cash flows expected to be generated by the customers acquired, considering specific assumptions for customer attrition, per unit gross profit, and operating costs. These assumptions are based on forecasts and historical experience.
Customer Relationships
Customer contracts recorded as part of mergers or acquisitions are reflected as customer relationships in our balance sheet. The Company had capitalized customer relationship of $12.1 million and $13.6 million, net of amortization, as current assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and $5.7 million and $17.8 million, net of amortization, as non-current assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, related to these intangible assets. These intangibles are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated average life of the related customer contracts acquired, which ranges from three to six years.
The acquired customer relationships intangibles related to Provider Companies, Major Energy Companies, Perigee Energy LLC, Verde Companies, and HIKO are reflective of the acquired companies’ customer base, and were valued at the respective dates of acquisition using an excess earnings method under the income approach. Using this method, the Company estimated the future cash flows resulting from the existing customer relationships, considering attrition as well as charges for contributory assets, such as net working capital, fixed assets, and assembled workforce. These future cash flows were then discounted using an appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return by retail unit to arrive at the present value of the expected future cash flows. Perigee, and HIKO customer relationships are amortized to depreciation and amortization based on the expected future net cash flows by year. The acquired customer relationship intangibles related to the Major Energy Companies, the Provider Companies and the Verde Companies were bifurcated between hedged and unhedged and amortized to depreciation and amortization based on the expected future cash flows by year and expensed to retail cost of revenue based on the expected term of the underlying fixed price contract in each reporting period, respectively.
Customer relationship amortization expense was $13.6 million, $18.3 million, and $20.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which approximately zero, less than $0.1 million, and $(1.2) million was included in retail cost of revenue for those years.
We review customer relationships for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate the carrying value of the intangible assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is indicated when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the intangible assets are less than their respective carrying value. If an impairment exists, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the intangible assets. No impairments of customer relationships were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Non-compete agreements
We capitalize intangible costs associated with non-compete agreements in certain of our acquisitions. Non-compete agreements provide the Company with a certain level of assurance that acquired companies' expected earnings streams will not be disrupted by competition from the companies’ previous owners or members. These non-compete agreements are amortized over their estimated useful life of three years on a straight-line basis. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company had no capitalized costs related to these non-compete agreements. Amortization expense was zero, $0.3 million and $1.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Trademarks
We record trademarks as part of our acquisitions which represent the value associated with the recognition and positive reputation of an acquired company to its target markets. This value would otherwise have to be internally developed through significant time and expense or by paying a third party for its use. These intangibles are amortized over the estimated five-year to ten-year life of the trademark on a straight-line basis. The fair values of trademark assets were determined at the date of acquisition using a royalty savings method under the income approach. Under this approach, the Company estimates the present value of expected cash flows resulting from avoiding royalty payments to use a third party trademark. The Company analyzes market royalty rates charged for licensing trademarks and applied an expected royalty rate to a forecast of estimated revenue, which was then discounted using an appropriate risk adjusted rate of return. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had recorded $4.6 million and $5.7 million related to these trademarks in other assets. Amortization expense was $1.1 million, $1.6 million, and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
We review trademarks for impairment whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate the carrying value of the intangible assets may not be recoverable. Impairment is indicated when the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by the intangible assets are less than their respective carrying value. If an impairment exists, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the intangible assets. No impairments of trademarks were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Operating Leases
The Company's leases consist of operating leases related to our offices with lease terms expiring through 2022. The initial term for our property leases is typically three to five years, with renewal options. Rent is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For our operating leases, we recorded rent expense of $0.4 million, $0.8 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We recorded sub-lease income of $0.2 million, $0.4 million and zero for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had recorded a right-of-use asset of $0.1 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in other current assets and other assets. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019 we had recorded a lease liability of $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, in other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities.
Deferred Financing Costs
Costs incurred in connection with the issuance of long-term debt are capitalized and amortized to interest expense using the straight-line method over the life of the related long-term debt. These costs are included in other assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
Property and Equipment
The Company records property and equipment at historical cost. Depreciation expense is recorded on a straight-line method based on estimated useful lives, which range from 2 to 5 years, along with estimates of the salvage values of the assets. When items of property and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, any gain or loss is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company capitalizes costs associated with certain of its internal-use software projects. Costs capitalized are those incurred during the application development stage of projects such as software configuration, coding, installation of hardware and testing. Costs incurred during the preliminary or post-implementation stage of the project are expensed in the period incurred, including costs associated with formulation of ideas and alternatives, training and application maintenance. After internal-use software projects are completed, the associated capitalized costs are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the related asset. Interest costs incurred while developing
internal-use software projects are also capitalized. Capitalized interest costs for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were not material.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of the assets of businesses acquired in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 350 Intangibles-Goodwill and Other ("ASC 350"). The goodwill on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 is associated with both our Retail Natural Gas and Retail Electricity segments. We determine our segments, which are also considered our reporting unit, by identifying each unit that engaged in business activities from which it may earn revenues and incur expenses, had operating results regularly reviewed by the segment manager for purposes of resource allocation and performance assessment, and had discrete financial information.
Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is assessed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that impairment of the carrying value of goodwill is likely, but no less often than annually as of October 31. We compare our estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we would recognize a goodwill impairment loss for the amount by which the reporting unit's carrying value exceeds its fair value. In accordance with our accounting policy, we completed our annual assessment of goodwill impairment as of October 31, 2020 during the fourth quarter of 2020, using a qualitative assessment approach, and the test indicated no impairment.
Treasury Stock
Treasury stock consists of Company's own stock that has been issued, but subsequently reacquired by the Company. Treasury stock does not reduce the number of shares issued but does reduce the number of shares outstanding. These shares are not eligible to receive cash dividends. We use the cost method to account for treasury shares.
Equity Method Investments
We use the equity method of accounting to account for investments where we have the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control over, the investee. Under the equity method of accounting, investments are stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and our share of earnings or losses and distributions. Prior to the sale of our equity investment in November 2019, our equity investment was presented on the consolidated balance sheet under "Other assets", with our share of their income reflected as "Total other income/(expense)" on the consolidated statements of operations. We determined our equity investment earnings using the Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value (HLBV) method. Under the HLBV method, a calculation was prepared at each balance sheet date to determine the amount the Company would receive if the investee were to liquidate all of its assets, as valued in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and distribute that cash to the investors. The difference between the calculated liquidation distribution amounts at the beginning and the end of the reporting period, after adjusting for capital contributions and distributions, is the Company's share of the earnings or losses from the equity investment for the period. See Note 17 "Equity Method Investment" for further discussion.
Revenues and Cost of Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of natural gas and electricity to customers, including affiliates. Revenues are recognized by the Company based on consideration specified in contracts with customers when performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control over products to a customer. Utilizing these criteria, revenue is recognized when the natural gas or electricity is delivered to the customer. Similarly, cost of revenues is recognized when the commodity is delivered.
Revenues for natural gas and electricity sales are recognized under the accrual method. Natural gas and electricity sales that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated. Accrued unbilled revenues are based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter read provided by the utility. Volume estimates are based
on forecasted volumes and estimated customer usage by class. Unbilled revenues are calculated by multiplying these volume estimates by the applicable rate by customer class. Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.
Costs for natural gas and electricity sales are similarly recognized under the accrual method. Natural gas and electricity costs that have not been billed to the Company by suppliers but have been incurred by period end are estimated. The Company estimates volumes for natural gas and electricity delivered based on the forecasted revenue volumes, estimated transportation cost volumes and estimation of other costs associated with retail load that varies by commodity utility territory. These costs include items like ISO fees, ancillary services and renewable energy credits. Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.
Our asset optimization activities, which primarily include natural gas physical arbitrage and other short term storage and transportation transactions, meet the definition of trading activities and are recorded on a net basis in the consolidated statements of operations in net asset optimization revenues. The Company recorded asset optimization revenues, primarily related to physical sales or purchases of commodities, of $24.8 million, $62.8 million and $113.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and recorded asset optimization costs of revenues of $25.5 million, $60.0 million and $109.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, which are presented on a net basis in asset optimization revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Natural Gas Imbalances
The consolidated balance sheets include natural gas imbalance receivables and payables, which primarily result when customers consume more or less gas than has been delivered by the Company to local distribution companies (“LDCs”). The settlement of natural gas imbalances varies by LDC, but typically the natural gas imbalances are settled in cash or in kind on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual or annual basis. The imbalances are valued at their estimated net realizable value. The Company recorded an imbalance receivable of $0.3 million and $1.6 million in other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The Company recorded an imbalance payable of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Derivative Instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments such as futures, swaps, forwards and options to manage the commodity price risks of its business operations.
All derivatives are recorded in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value. Derivative instruments representing unrealized gains are reported as derivative assets while derivative instruments representing unrealized losses are reported as derivative liabilities. We offset amounts in the consolidated balance sheets for derivative instruments executed with the same counterparty where we have a master netting arrangement.
As part of our asset optimization activities, we manage a portfolio of commodity derivative instruments held for trading purposes. Changes in fair value of and amounts realized upon settlements of derivatives instruments held for trading purposes are recognized in earnings in net asset optimization revenues.
To manage the retail business, the Company holds derivative instruments that are not for trading purposes and are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. Changes in the fair value of and amounts realized upon settlement of derivative instruments not held for trading purposes are recognized in retail costs of revenues.
Income Taxes
The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes where deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the
financial statements or tax returns and operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in those years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in the tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will not be realized. Amounts owed or refundable on current year returns is included as a current payable or receivable in the consolidated balance sheet.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the provision for income taxes on continuing operations in our consolidated statements of operations.
Earnings per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income attributable to stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding for the period (the denominator). Class B common shares are not included in the calculation of basic earnings per share because they are not participating securities and have no economic interests. Diluted earnings per share is similarly calculated except that the denominator is increased by potentially dilutive securities. We use the treasury stock method to determine the potential dilutive effect of our outstanding unvested restricted stock units and use the if-converted method to determine the potential dilutive effect of our Class B common stock.
Non-controlling Interest
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest represents the Class B Common stockholders' interest in income and expenses of the Company. The weighted average ownership percentages for the applicable reporting period are used to allocate the income (loss) before income taxes to each economic interest owner.
Commitments and Contingencies
Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs incurred in connection with loss contingencies are expensed as incurred.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"). ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a current expected credit loss ("CECL") model, which is a new impairment model based on expected losses rather than incurred losses on financial assets, including trade accounts receivables. The model requires financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted ASU 2016-13 and related amendments effective January 1, 2020, and the adoption did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Standards Being Evaluated/Standards Not Yet Adopted
Below are accounting standards that have been issued, but not yet been adopted by the Company at December 31, 2020. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not listed below were assessed and
determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes ("ASU 2019-12"). These amendments simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020. We do not expect adoption of the new standard to have a material impact to our consolidated statement of operations.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting ("ASU 2020-04"). The amendments in ASU 2020-04 provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. In January 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (“ASU 2021-01”), which clarifies the scope and application of certain optional expedients and exceptions regarding the original guidance. ASU 2021-01 may be applied prospectively through December 31, 2022. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. We do not expect adoption of the new standard to have a material impact to our consolidated statement of operations.
3. Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of natural gas and electricity to customers, including affiliates. Revenue is measured based upon the quantity of gas or power delivered at prices contained or referenced in the customer's contract, and excludes any sales incentives (e.g. rebates) and amounts collected on behalf of third parties (e.g. sales tax).
Our revenues also include asset optimization activities. Asset optimization activities consist primarily of purchases and sales of gas that meet the definition of trading activities per FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. They are therefore excluded from the scope of FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Revenues for electricity and natural gas sales are recognized under the accrual method when our performance obligation to a customer is satisfied, which is the point in time when the product is delivered and control of the product passes to the customer. Electricity and natural gas products may be sold as fixed-price or variable-price products. The typical length of a contract to provide electricity and/or natural gas is 12 months. Customers are billed and typically pay at least monthly, based on usage. Electricity and natural gas sales that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated and recorded as accrued unbilled revenues based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter read provided by the utility. Volume estimates are based on forecasted volumes and estimated residential and commercial customer usage. Unbilled revenues are calculated by multiplying these volume estimates by the applicable rate by customer class (residential or commercial). Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.
The following table discloses revenue by primary geographical market, customer type, and customer credit risk profile (in thousands). The table also includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue to revenue by reportable segment (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Retail Electricity
|
Retail Natural Gas
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
Retail Electricity
|
Retail Natural Gas
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
Retail Electricity
|
Retail Natural Gas
|
Total Reportable Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary markets (a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New England
|
$
|
166,982
|
|
$
|
14,846
|
|
$
|
181,828
|
|
|
$
|
284,909
|
|
$
|
19,289
|
|
$
|
304,198
|
|
|
$
|
395,682
|
|
$
|
21,221
|
|
$
|
416,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid-Atlantic
|
166,157
|
|
32,769
|
|
198,926
|
|
|
242,556
|
|
42,469
|
|
285,025
|
|
|
291,046
|
|
54,815
|
|
345,861
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midwest
|
57,314
|
|
26,368
|
|
83,682
|
|
|
79,188
|
|
39,200
|
|
118,388
|
|
|
73,167
|
|
39,894
|
|
113,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southwest
|
70,940
|
|
20,171
|
|
91,111
|
|
|
81,798
|
|
21,545
|
|
103,343
|
|
|
103,556
|
|
22,036
|
|
125,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
461,393
|
|
$
|
94,154
|
|
$
|
555,547
|
|
|
$
|
688,451
|
|
$
|
122,503
|
|
$
|
810,954
|
|
|
$
|
863,451
|
|
$
|
137,966
|
|
$
|
1,001,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer type
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
$
|
128,874
|
|
$
|
31,205
|
|
$
|
160,079
|
|
|
$
|
249,730
|
|
$
|
40,466
|
|
$
|
290,196
|
|
|
$
|
355,607
|
|
$
|
50,156
|
|
$
|
405,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
341,382
|
|
66,305
|
|
407,687
|
|
|
449,900
|
|
83,455
|
|
533,355
|
|
|
518,261
|
|
93,186
|
|
611,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled revenue (b)
|
(8,863)
|
|
(3,356)
|
|
(12,219)
|
|
|
(11,179)
|
|
(1,418)
|
|
(12,597)
|
|
|
(10,417)
|
|
(5,376)
|
|
(15,793)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
461,393
|
|
$
|
94,154
|
|
$
|
555,547
|
|
|
$
|
688,451
|
|
$
|
122,503
|
|
$
|
810,954
|
|
|
$
|
863,451
|
|
$
|
137,966
|
|
$
|
1,001,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer credit risk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POR
|
$
|
308,010
|
|
$
|
47,470
|
|
$
|
355,480
|
|
|
$
|
479,011
|
|
$
|
64,416
|
|
$
|
543,427
|
|
|
$
|
586,901
|
|
$
|
71,565
|
|
$
|
658,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-POR
|
153,383
|
|
46,684
|
|
200,067
|
|
|
209,440
|
|
58,087
|
|
267,527
|
|
|
276,550
|
|
66,401
|
|
342,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
461,393
|
|
$
|
94,154
|
|
$
|
555,547
|
|
|
$
|
688,451
|
|
$
|
122,503
|
|
$
|
810,954
|
|
|
$
|
863,451
|
|
$
|
137,966
|
|
$
|
1,001,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) The primary markets include the following states:
•New England - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire;
•Mid-Atlantic - Delaware, Maryland (including the District of Colombia), New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania;
•Midwest - Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio; and
•Southwest - Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, and Texas.
(b) Unbilled revenue is recorded in total until it is actualized, at which time it is categorized between commercial and residential customers.
We record gross receipts taxes on a gross basis in retail revenues and retail cost of revenues. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 our retail revenues included gross receipts taxes of $1.3 million, $1.5 million and $1.6 million respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, our retail cost of revenues included gross receipts taxes of $5.9 million, $8.4 million and $9.9 million, respectively.
Accounts receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses
As discussed in Note 2, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, we adopted the new accounting standards for measuring credit losses effective January 1, 2020.
The Company conducts business in many utility service markets where the local regulated utility purchases our receivables, and then becomes responsible for billing the customer and collecting payment from the customer (“POR programs”). These POR programs result in substantially all of the Company’s credit risk being linked to the
applicable utility, which generally has an investment-grade rating, and not to the end-use customer. The Company monitors the financial condition of each utility and currently believes its receivables are collectible.
In markets that do not offer POR programs or when the Company chooses to directly bill its customers, certain receivables are billed and collected by the Company. The Company bears the credit risk on these accounts and records an appropriate allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect any losses due to non-payment by customers. The Company’s customers are individually insignificant and geographically dispersed in these markets. The Company writes off customer balances when it believes that amounts are no longer collectible and when it has exhausted all means to collect these receivables.
For trade accounts receivables, the Company accrues an allowance for doubtful accounts by business segment by pooling customer accounts receivables based on similar risk characteristics, such as customer type, geography, aging analysis, payment terms, and related macroeconomic factors. Expected credit loss exposure is evaluated for each of our accounts receivables pools. Expected credits losses are established using a model that considers historical collections experience, current information, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. The Company writes off accounts receivable balances against the allowance for doubtful accounts when the accounts receivable is deemed to be uncollectible.
We assess the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts through review of an aging of customer accounts receivable and general economic conditions in the markets that we serve. Bad debt expense of $4.7 million, $13.5 million and $10.1 million was recorded in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
A rollforward of our allowance for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2020 is presented in the table below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
$
|
(4,797)
|
|
Impact of adoption of ASC 326
|
(633)
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
(3,234)
|
|
Write-offs
|
5,464
|
|
Recovery of previous write offs
|
(742)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
$
|
(3,942)
|
|
4. Acquisitions
Acquisition of HIKO
In March 2018, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement under which we acquired all of the membership interests of HIKO Energy, LLC ("HIKO"), a New York limited liability company, for a total purchase price of $6.0 million in cash, plus working capital. At the time of acquisition, HIKO had a total of approximately 29,000 RCEs located in 42 markets in seven states. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method. Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon the estimated fair value of the tangible and
identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition. The allocation of the purchase consideration is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Purchase Price Allocation as of December 31, 2018
|
Cash and restricted cash
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
Intangible assets—customer relationships
|
|
|
6,031
|
|
Net working capital, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
8,465
|
|
Fair value of derivative liabilities
|
|
|
(205)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
14,666
|
|
Our consolidated statements of operations for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 included $15.3 million of revenue and $3.8 million of net income related to the operations of HIKO.
In each of our acquisitions, we evaluate and allocate purchase price based on the following general assumptions.
Customer relationships. Acquired customer relationships were reflective of the acquired companies' customer bases, and were valued using an excess earnings method under the income approach. Using this method, we estimated the future cash flows resulting from the existing customer relationships, considering estimated attrition as well as charges for contributory assets, such as net working capital, intangible assets, fixed assets, and any assembled workforce. These future cash flows were then discounted using an appropriate risk-adjusted rate of return to arrive at the present value of the expected future cash flows.
In acquisitions where we acquired commodity contracts that we could match to fixed-price contracts, customer relationships were bifurcated between unhedged and hedged and are being amortized based on the expected term of the underlying fixed-price contract acquired in each reporting period, respectively.
Customer Acquisitions. We also, from time to time, acquire books of customers from affiliated and non-affiliated parties. These acquisitions do not involve an allocation of the purchase price but rather are recorded as customer relationships.
Acquisition from Related Parties
In March 2018, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with an affiliate pursuant to which we agreed to acquire up to 50,000 RCEs for a cash purchase price of $250 for each RCE, or up to $12.5 million in the aggregate. These customers began transferring after April 1, 2018 and are located in 24 markets in 8 states. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid $8.8 million under the terms of the purchase agreement for approximately 35,000 RCEs. No additional customer transfers or consideration will be paid on this transaction. The acquisition was treated as a transfer of assets between entities under common control, and accordingly, the assets were recorded at our affiliate's historical value at the date of transfer, which was $1.7 million. The transaction resulted in $7.1 million recorded in equity as a net distribution to affiliate as of December 31, 2018. Of the $8.8 million paid to our affiliate, $1.7 million was an investing cash outflow, and the remaining $7.1 million was deemed a distribution to our non-controlling interest and classified as financing activity.
Acquisitions of Customer Books
In October 2018, we entered into an asset purchase agreement pursuant to which we agreed to acquire up to 60,000 RCEs from Starion Energy Inc., Starion Energy NY Inc. and Starion Energy PA Inc. (collectively "Starion") for a cash purchase price of up to a maximum of $10.7 million. These customers began transferring in December 2018 and are located in our existing markets. As of December 31, 2019, a total of $8.0 million was paid
under the terms of the purchase agreement for approximately 51,000 RCEs. The customer transfer was completed in 2019.
As part of the acquisition, we funded an escrow account, the balance of which is reflected as restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the balance in the escrow account was zero and $1.0 million, respectively.
5. Equity
Non-controlling Interest
We hold an economic interest and are the sole managing member in Spark HoldCo, with affiliates of our Founder and majority shareholder holding the remaining economic interests in Spark HoldCo. As a result, we consolidate the financial position and results of operations of Spark HoldCo, and reflect the economic interests owned by these affiliates as a non-controlling interest. The Company and affiliates owned the following economic interests in Spark HoldCo at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company
|
Affiliated Owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
41.53
|
%
|
58.47
|
%
|
December 31, 2019
|
41.04
|
%
|
58.96
|
%
|
The following table summarizes the portion of net income (loss) and income tax expense (benefit) attributable to non-controlling interest (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) allocated to non-controlling interest
|
$
|
44,277
|
|
$
|
7,604
|
|
$
|
(12,140)
|
|
Income tax expense allocated to non-controlling interest
|
5,349
|
|
1,841
|
|
1,066
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest
|
$
|
38,928
|
|
$
|
5,763
|
|
$
|
(13,206)
|
|
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
Holders of the Company's Class A common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all matters presented to our stockholders for their vote or approval, except as otherwise required by applicable law or by our certificate of incorporation.
Dividends on Class A Common Stock
Dividends declared for the Company's Class A common stock are reported as a reduction of retained earnings, or a reduction of additional paid in capital to the extent retained earnings are exhausted. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, we paid dividends on our Class A common stock of $10.6 million, $10.4 million, and $9.8 million. This dividend represented an annual rate of $0.725 per share on each share of Class A common stock.
On January 21, 2021, the Company declared a dividend of $0.18125 per share to holders of record of our Class A common stock on March 1, 2021 and payable on March 15, 2021.
In order to pay our stated dividends to holders of our Class A common stock, our subsidiary, Spark HoldCo is required to make corresponding distributions to holders of its units, including those holders that own our Class B common stock (our non-controlling interest holder). As a result, during the year ended December 31, 2020, Spark HoldCo made corresponding distributions of $15.1 million to our non-controlling interest holders.
Share Repurchase Program
On August 18, 2020, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program of up to $20.0 million of Class A common stock through August 18, 2021. We are funding the program through available cash balances, our Senior Credit Facility and operating cash flows.
The shares of Class A common stock may be repurchased from time to time in the open market at prevailing market prices or in privately negotiated transactions based on ongoing assessments of capital needs, the market price of the stock, and other factors, including general market conditions. The repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of Class A common stock, may be modified or suspended at any time, and could be terminated prior to completion.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 45,148 shares of our Class A common stock at a weighted average price of $8.75 per share, for a total cost of $0.4 million.
Preferred Stock
The Company has 20,000,000 shares of authorized preferred stock for which there are 3,707,256 shares issued and 3,567,543 shares outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 3,707,256 shares issued and 3,677,318 outstanding shares at December 31, 2019. See Note 6 "Preferred Stock" for a further discussion of preferred stock.
Issuance of Class A Common Stock Upon Vesting of Restricted Stock Units
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, 469,811, 473,492, and 394,243, respectively of restricted stock units vested, with 292,879, 300,715, and 258,076, respectively of shares of common stock distributed to the holders of these units. Differences between shares vested and issued were a result of 176,932, 172,777, and 136,167 shares of common stock withheld by the Company to cover taxes owed on the vesting of such units.
Conversion of Class B Common Stock to Class A Common Stock
In 2018, holders of Class B common stock exchanged 685,126 of their Spark HoldCo units (together with a corresponding number of shares of Class B common stock) for shares of Class A common stock at an exchange ratio of one share of Class A common stock for each Spark HoldCo unit (and corresponding share of Class B common stock) exchanged.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income attributable to stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding for the period (the denominator). Class B common shares are not included in the calculation of basic earnings per share because they are not participating securities and have no economic interests. Diluted earnings per share is similarly calculated except that the denominator is increased by potentially dilutive securities.
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. stockholders
|
$
|
29,290
|
|
$
|
8,450
|
|
$
|
(1,186)
|
|
Less: Dividend on Series A preferred stock
|
7,441
|
|
8,091
|
|
8,109
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock
|
$
|
21,849
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
$
|
(9,295)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average Class A common shares outstanding
|
14,555
|
|
14,286
|
|
13,390
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share attributable to stockholders
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
$
|
(0.69)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock
|
$
|
21,849
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
$
|
(9,295)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock
|
$
|
21,849
|
|
$
|
359
|
|
$
|
(9,295)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average Class A common shares outstanding
|
14,555
|
|
14,286
|
|
13,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive restricted stock units
|
160
|
|
282
|
|
—
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
14,715
|
|
14,568
|
|
13,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to stockholders
|
$
|
1.48
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
$
|
(0.69)
|
|
The computation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2020 excludes 20.8 million shares of Class B common stock because the effect of their conversion was antidilutive. The Company's outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they contain only contingent redemption provisions that have not occurred.
Variable Interest Entity
Spark HoldCo is a variable interest entity due to its lack of rights to participate in significant financial and operating decisions and its inability to dissolve or otherwise remove its management. Spark HoldCo owns all of the outstanding membership interests in each of our operating subsidiaries. We are the sole managing member of Spark HoldCo, manage Spark HoldCo's operating subsidiaries through this managing membership interest, and are considered the primary beneficiary of Spark HoldCo. The assets of Spark HoldCo cannot be used to settle our obligations except through distributions to us, and the liabilities of Spark HoldCo cannot be settled by us except through contributions to Spark HoldCo. The following table includes the carrying amounts and classification of the assets and liabilities of Spark HoldCo that are included in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
December 31, 2019
|
Assets
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
71,442
|
|
$
|
56,598
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
70,350
|
|
113,635
|
|
Other current assets
|
55,575
|
|
64,476
|
|
Total current assets
|
197,367
|
|
234,709
|
|
Non-current assets:
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
120,343
|
|
120,343
|
|
Other assets
|
15,259
|
|
37,826
|
|
Total non-current assets
|
135,602
|
|
158,169
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
332,969
|
|
$
|
392,878
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities
|
$
|
61,436
|
|
$
|
86,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
43,676
|
|
65,863
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
105,112
|
|
151,960
|
|
Long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
Long-term portion of Senior Credit Facility
|
100,000
|
|
123,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
256
|
|
712
|
|
Total long-term liabilities
|
100,256
|
|
123,712
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
$
|
205,368
|
|
$
|
275,672
|
|
6. Preferred Stock
In January 2018, we issued 2,000,000 shares of 8.75% Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock ("Series A Preferred Stock"), par value $0.01 per share and having a liquidation preference $25.00 per share, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, at a price to the public of $25.25 per share. The Company received approximately $48.9 million ($24.45 per share) in net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and a structuring fee. Offering expenses of $0.5 million were recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the Series A Preferred Stock.
In May 2019, we commenced a share repurchase program of our Series A Preferred Stock, which allowed us to make purchases of our Series A Preferred Stock under the repurchase program through May 20, 2020. There was no dollar limit on the amount of Series A Preferred Stock that could be repurchased, nor did the repurchase program obligate the Company to make any repurchases.
In November 2019, we amended and extended our repurchase program of our Series A Preferred Stock. The repurchase program allowed us to purchase Series A Preferred Stock through December 31, 2020, at prevailing prices, in open market or negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, maximum share prices and other considerations. The repurchase program did not obligate us to make any repurchases.
In May 2020, we initiated a tender offer to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our Series A Preferred Stock. In June 2020, we accepted for purchase 36,827 shares of the Series A Preferred Stock at a purchase price of $22.00 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $0.8 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we repurchased 109,775 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a weighted-average price of $20.79 per share, for a total cost of approximately $2.3 million.
Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except in specific circumstances of delisting or in the case the dividends are in arrears as specified in the Series A Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations. The Series A Preferred Stock accrue dividends at an annual percentage rate of 8.75%, and the liquidation preference provisions of the Series A Preferred Stock are considered contingent redemption provisions because there are rights granted to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock that are not solely within our control upon a change in control of the Company. Accordingly, the Series A Preferred Stock is presented between liabilities and the equity sections in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
During the year ended December 31, 2020, we paid $7.9 million in dividends to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. As of December 31, 2020, we had accrued $1.9 million related to dividends to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. This dividend was paid on January 15, 2021. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid $8.1 million in dividends to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and had accrued $2.0 million as of December 31, 2019.
On January 21, 2021, the Company declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.546875 per share of Series A Preferred Stock. This amount represents an annualized dividend of $2.1875 per share. The dividend will be paid on April 15, 2021 to holders of record on April 1, 2021 of the Series A Preferred Stock.
A summary of our preferred equity balance for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
90,758
|
|
Repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
(727)
|
|
Accumulated dividends on Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
(16)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
90,015
|
|
Repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
(2,667)
|
|
Accumulated dividends on Series A Preferred Stock
|
|
(60)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
|
$
|
87,288
|
|
7. Derivative Instruments
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity and natural gas, basis differences in the price of natural gas, storage charges, renewable energy credits ("RECs"), and capacity charges from independent system operators. We use derivative instruments in an effort to manage our cash flow exposure to these risks. These instruments are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and accordingly, changes in the market value of these derivative instruments are recorded in the cost of revenues. As part of our strategy to optimize pricing in our natural gas related activities, we also manage a portfolio of commodity derivative instruments held for trading purposes. Our commodity trading activities are subject to limits within our Risk Management Policy. For these derivative instruments, changes in the fair value are recognized currently in earnings in net asset optimization revenues.
Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net in our consolidated balance sheets when the derivative instruments are executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. Our derivative contracts include transactions that are executed both on an exchange and centrally cleared, as well as over-the-counter, bilateral contracts that are transacted directly with third parties. To the extent we have paid or received collateral related to the derivative assets or liabilities, such amounts would be presented net against the related derivative asset or liability’s fair value. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had paid $0.1 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in collateral. The specific types of derivative instruments we may execute to manage the commodity price risk include the following:
•Forward contracts, which commit us to purchase or sell energy commodities in the future;
•Futures contracts, which are exchange-traded standardized commitments to purchase or sell a commodity or financial instrument;
•Swap agreements, which require payments to or from counterparties based upon the differential between two prices for a predetermined notional quantity; and
•Option contracts, which convey to the option holder the right but not the obligation to purchase or sell a commodity.
The Company has entered into other energy-related contracts that do not meet the definition of a derivative instrument or for which we made a normal purchase, normal sale election and are therefore not accounted for at fair value including the following:
•Forward electricity and natural gas purchase contracts for retail customer load;
•Renewable energy credits; and
•Natural gas transportation contracts and storage agreements.
Volumes Underlying Derivative Transactions
The following table summarizes the net notional volumes of our open derivative financial instruments accounted for at fair value by commodity. Positive amounts represent net buys while bracketed amounts are net sell transactions (in thousands):
Non-trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
Notional
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Natural Gas
|
MMBtu
|
|
2,880
|
|
|
6,130
|
|
Natural Gas Basis
|
MMBtu
|
|
—
|
|
|
42
|
|
Electricity
|
MWh
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
6,015
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
Notional
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Natural Gas
|
MMBtu
|
|
102
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net and current period settlements on derivative instruments were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on non-trading derivatives, net
|
$
|
(23,439)
|
|
|
$
|
(67,955)
|
|
|
$
|
(19,571)
|
|
Gain on trading derivatives, net
|
53
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
Loss on derivatives, net
|
$
|
(23,386)
|
|
|
$
|
(67,749)
|
|
|
$
|
(18,170)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives (1) (2)
|
37,921
|
|
|
42,944
|
|
|
(9,614)
|
|
Current period settlements on trading derivatives
|
(192)
|
|
|
(124)
|
|
|
(973)
|
|
Total current period settlements on derivatives (1) (2)
|
$
|
37,729
|
|
|
$
|
42,820
|
|
|
$
|
(10,587)
|
|
(1) Excludes settlements of zero, less than $0.1 million, and $(0.3) million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 related to non-trading derivative liabilities assumed in various acquisitions.
(2) Excludes settlements of $0.3 million, $(0.9) million, and zero, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 related to power call options.
Gains (losses) on trading derivative instruments are recorded in net asset optimization revenues and gains (losses) on non-trading derivative instruments are recorded in retail cost of revenues on the consolidated statements of operations.
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following tables summarize the fair value and offsetting amounts of our derivative instruments by counterparty and collateral received or paid (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
Description
|
Gross Assets
|
|
Gross
Amounts
Offset
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Cash
Collateral
Offset
|
|
Net Amount
Presented
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
$
|
308
|
|
|
$
|
(105)
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
112
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
108
|
|
Total Current Derivative Assets
|
420
|
|
|
(109)
|
|
|
311
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
311
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Non-current Derivative Assets
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Derivative Assets
|
$
|
420
|
|
|
$
|
(109)
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
Gross
Liabilities
|
|
Gross
Amounts
Offset
|
|
Net
Liabilities
|
|
Cash
Collateral
Offset
|
|
Net Amount
Presented
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
$
|
(11,139)
|
|
|
$
|
3,620
|
|
|
$
|
(7,519)
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(7,433)
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
(74)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
Total Current Derivative Liabilities
|
(11,213)
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
(7,591)
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
(7,505)
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
(838)
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
(227)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(227)
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Non-current Derivative Liabilities
|
(838)
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
(227)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(227)
|
|
Total Derivative Liabilities
|
$
|
(12,051)
|
|
|
$
|
4,233
|
|
|
$
|
(7,818)
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
(7,732)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Description
|
Gross Assets
|
|
Gross
Amounts
Offset
|
|
Net Assets
|
|
Cash
Collateral
Offset
|
|
Net Amount
Presented
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
(275)
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
170
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
169
|
|
Total Current Derivative Assets
|
740
|
|
|
(276)
|
|
|
464
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
464
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
333
|
|
|
(227)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
106
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Non-current Derivative Assets
|
333
|
|
|
(227)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
106
|
|
Total Derivative Assets
|
$
|
1,073
|
|
|
$
|
(503)
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
Gross
Liabilities
|
|
Gross
Amounts
Offset
|
|
Net
Liabilities
|
|
Cash
Collateral
Offset
|
|
Net Amount
Presented
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
$
|
(34,434)
|
|
|
$
|
12,859
|
|
|
$
|
(21,575)
|
|
|
$
|
1,632
|
|
|
$
|
(19,943)
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
(194)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Current Derivative Liabilities
|
(34,628)
|
|
|
13,053
|
|
|
(21,575)
|
|
|
1,632
|
|
|
(19,943)
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivatives
|
(1,951)
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
(529)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
(495)
|
|
Trading commodity derivatives
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Non-current Derivative Liabilities
|
(1,951)
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
(529)
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
(495)
|
|
Total Derivative Liabilities
|
$
|
(36,579)
|
|
|
$
|
14,475
|
|
|
$
|
(22,104)
|
|
|
$
|
1,666
|
|
|
$
|
(20,438)
|
|
8. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
useful
lives (years)
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Information technology
|
2 – 5
|
|
$
|
5,821
|
|
|
$
|
22,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
2 – 5
|
|
957
|
|
|
1,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
6,778
|
|
|
23,807
|
|
Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(3,424)
|
|
|
(20,540)
|
|
Property and equipment—net
|
|
|
$
|
3,354
|
|
|
$
|
3,267
|
|
Information technology assets include software and consultant time used in the application, development and implementation of various systems including customer billing and resource management systems. As of each of December 31, 2020 and 2019, information technology includes $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of costs associated with assets not yet placed into service.
Depreciation expense recorded in the consolidated statements of operations was $2.1 million, $2.3 million and $3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
9. Intangible Assets
Goodwill, customer relationships and trademarks consist of the following amounts (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
Customer Relationships— Acquired
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
$
|
58,688
|
|
|
$
|
64,083
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
(44,175)
|
|
|
(40,231)
|
|
Customer Relationships—Acquired
|
$
|
14,513
|
|
|
$
|
23,852
|
|
Customer Relationships—Other
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
$
|
8,988
|
|
|
$
|
17,056
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
(5,733)
|
|
|
(9,534)
|
|
Customer Relationships—Other, net
|
$
|
3,255
|
|
|
$
|
7,522
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
$
|
7,570
|
|
|
$
|
8,502
|
|
Accumulated amortization
|
(2,972)
|
|
|
(2,794)
|
|
Trademarks, net
|
$
|
4,598
|
|
|
$
|
5,708
|
|
Changes in goodwill, customer relationships (including non-compete agreements) and trademarks consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
Customer Relationships— Acquired & Non-Compete Agreements
|
|
Customer Relationships— Other
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
120,154
|
|
|
$
|
46,690
|
|
|
$
|
6,802
|
|
|
$
|
8,558
|
|
Additions
|
—
|
|
|
6,205
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adjustments (1)
|
189
|
|
|
(174)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization
|
—
|
|
|
(16,527)
|
|
|
(3,755)
|
|
|
(1,271)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
|
$
|
36,194
|
|
|
$
|
6,865
|
|
|
$
|
7,287
|
|
Additions
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization
|
—
|
|
|
(12,342)
|
|
|
(6,256)
|
|
|
(1,579)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
|
$
|
23,852
|
|
|
$
|
7,522
|
|
|
$
|
5,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
—
|
|
|
(9,339)
|
|
|
(4,267)
|
|
|
(1,110)
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2020
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
|
$
|
14,513
|
|
|
$
|
3,255
|
|
|
$
|
4,598
|
|
(1) Related to working capital adjustments on various acquisitions.
The acquired customer relationship intangibles related to Major Energy Companies, the Provider Companies, and the Verde Companies were bifurcated between hedged and unhedged customer contracts. The unhedged customer contracts are amortized to depreciation and amortization based on the expected future cash flows by year. The hedged customer contracts were evaluated for favorable or unfavorable positions at the time of acquisition and amortized to retail cost of revenue based on the expected term and position of the underlying fixed price contract in each reporting period. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively, approximately zero, less than $0.1 million, and $(1.2) million of the $9.3 million, $12.3 million, and $16.5 million acquired customer relationship amortization expense is included in retail cost of revenues.
Estimated future amortization expense for customer relationships and trademarks at December 31, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31,
|
|
2021
|
$
|
13,142
|
|
2022
|
6,194
|
|
2023
|
605
|
|
2024
|
404
|
|
2025
|
404
|
|
> 5 years
|
1,617
|
|
Total
|
$
|
22,366
|
|
10. Debt
Debt consists of the following amounts as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility (1) (2)
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
123,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
100,000
|
|
|
123,000
|
|
Total debt
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
123,000
|
|
(1) As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the weighted average interest rate on the Senior Credit Facility was 3.75% and 4.71%, respectively.
(2) As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had $31.0 million and $37.4 million in letters of credit issued, respectively.
Capitalized financing costs associated with our Senior Credit Facility were $1.6 million and $1.3 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Of these amounts, $1.0 million and $0.9 million are recorded in other current assets, and $0.6 million and $0.4 million are recorded in other non-current assets in the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Interest expense consists of the following components for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Senior Credit Facility
|
$
|
2,291
|
|
|
$
|
5,263
|
|
|
$
|
5,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of credit fees and commitment fees
|
1,472
|
|
|
1,656
|
|
|
1,604
|
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
1,210
|
|
|
1,275
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
293
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
26
|
|
Verde promissory note
|
—
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
Interest expense
|
$
|
5,266
|
|
|
$
|
8,621
|
|
|
$
|
9,410
|
|
Senior Credit Facility
The Company, as guarantor, and Spark HoldCo (the “Borrower” and, together with each subsidiary of Spark HoldCo (“Co-Borrowers”)) maintain a senior secured borrowing base credit facility (as amended from time to time, “Senior Credit Facility”) that allows us to borrow on a revolving basis and has a maximum borrowing capacity of $202.5 million as of December 31, 2020. Subject to applicable sublimits and terms of the Senior Credit Facility, borrowings are available for the issuance of letters of credit (“Letters of Credit”), working capital and general purpose revolving credit loans (“Working Capital Loans”), and share buyback loans (“Share Buyback Loans”).
The Senior Credit Facility will mature on July 31, 2022, and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be payable on the maturity date. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility may be used to pay fees and expenses in connection with the Senior Credit Facility, finance ongoing working capital requirements and general corporate purpose requirements of the Co-Borrowers, to provide partial funding for acquisitions, as allowed under terms of the Senior Credit Facility, and to make open market purchases of our Class A common stock and Series A Preferred Stock. The Senior Credit Facility provides for Share Buyback Loans of up to $80.0 million, which permit the Company to repurchase up to an aggregate of 8,000,000 shares of Class A common stock or $80.0 million of Series A Preferred Stock.
On January 19, 2021, we increased the total commitments under our Senior Credit Facility to $227.5 million.
Pursuant to the Senior Credit Facility, the interest rate for Working Capital Loans and Letters of Credit under the Senior Credit Facility is generally determined by reference to the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of up to 3.25% per annum (based on the prevailing utilization) or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of up to
2.25% per annum (based on the prevailing utilization). The alternate base rate is equal to the highest of (i) the prime rate (as published in the Wall Street Journal), (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum, or (iii) the reference Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%.
Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility for Share Buyback Loans, are generally determined by reference to the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of 4.50% per annum or the alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of 3.50% per annum.
The Co-Borrowers pay a commitment fee of 0.50% quarterly in arrears on the unused portion of the Senior Credit Facility. In addition, the Co-Borrowers are subject to additional fees including an upfront fee, an annual agency fee, and letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the face amount of letters of credit payable to any syndicate member that issues a letter of credit.
The Senior Credit Facility contains covenants that, among other things, require the maintenance of specified ratios or conditions including:
•Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. We must maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00. The Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA to (b) the sum of consolidated (with respect to the Company and the Co-Borrowers) interest expense, letter of credit fees, commitment fees, acquisition earn-out payments (excluding earnout payments funded with proceeds from newly issued preferred or common equity), distributions, scheduled amortization payments, and payments made on or after the closing of the Fourth Amendment to the Senior Credit Facility (other than such payments made from escrow accounts which were funded in connection with a permitted acquisition) related to the settlement of civil and regulatory matters if not included in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA.
•Maximum Total Leverage Ratio. We must maintain a ratio of (x) the sum of total indebtedness (excluding eligible subordinated debt and letter of credit obligations), plus (y) gross amounts reserved for civil and regulatory liabilities identified in SEC filings, to Adjusted EBITDA of no more than 2.50 to 1.00.
•Maximum Senior Secured Leverage Ratio. We must maintain a Senior Secured Leverage Ratio of no more than 1.85 to 1.00. The Senior Secured Leverage Ratio is defined as the ratio of (a) all indebtedness of the loan parties on a consolidated basis that is secured by a lien on any property of any loan party (including the effective amount of all loans then outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility) to (b) Adjusted EBITDA.
The Senior Credit Facility contains various negative covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, incur certain additional indebtedness, grant certain liens, engage in certain asset dispositions, merge or consolidate, make certain payments, distributions, investments, acquisitions or loans, materially modify certain agreements, or enter into transactions with affiliates. The Senior Credit Facility also contains affirmative covenants that are customary for credit facilities of this type. As of December 31, 2020, we were in compliance with our various covenants under the Senior Credit Facility.
The Senior Credit Facility is secured by pledges of the equity of the portion of Spark HoldCo owned by us, the equity of Spark HoldCo’s subsidiaries, the Co-Borrowers’ present and future subsidiaries, and substantially all of the Co-Borrowers’ and their subsidiaries’ present and future property and assets, including accounts receivable, inventory and liquid investments, and control agreements relating to bank accounts.
We are entitled to pay cash dividends to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and Class A common stock and will be entitled to repurchase up to an aggregate amount of 10,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock, and up to $92.7 million of Series A Preferred Stock through one or more normal course open market purchases through NASDAQ so long as: (a) no default exists or would result therefrom; (b) the Co-Borrowers are in pro forma compliance with all financial covenants before and after giving effect thereto; and (c) the outstanding amount of all loans and letters of credit does not exceed the borrowing base limits.
The Senior Credit Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties and events of default. Events of default include, among other things, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults and cross-acceleration to certain indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy, certain events under ERISA, material judgments in excess of $5.0 million, certain events with respect to material contracts, and actual or asserted failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the Senior Credit Facility to be in full force and effect. A default will also occur if at any time W. Keith Maxwell III ceases to, directly or indirectly, own at least 13,600,000 Class A and Class B shares on a combined basis (to be adjusted for any stock split, subdivisions or other stock reclassification or recapitalization), and a controlling percentage of the voting equity interest of the Company, and certain other changes in control. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Senior Credit Facility would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the facility and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.
Subordinated Debt Facility
The Company maintains an Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note in the principal amount of up to $25.0 million (the “Subordinated Debt Facility”), by and among the Company, Spark HoldCo and Retailco. The Subordinated Debt Facility matures on January 31, 2023.
The Subordinated Debt Facility allows us to draw advances in increments of no less than $1.0 million per advance up to the maximum principal amount of the Subordinated Debt Facility. Advances thereunder accrue interest at 5% per annum from the date of the advance. We have the right to capitalize interest payments under the Subordinated Debt Facility. The Subordinated Debt Facility is subordinated in certain respects to our Senior Credit Facility pursuant to a subordination agreement. We may pay interest and prepay principal on the Subordinated Debt Facility so long as we are in compliance with the covenants under our Senior Credit Facility, are not in default under the Senior Credit Facility and have minimum availability of $5.0 million under the borrowing base under the Senior Credit Facility. Payment of principal and interest under the Subordinated Debt Facility is accelerated upon the occurrence of certain change of control or sale transactions.
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Subordinated Debt Facility.
Verde Notes
In connection with the acquisition of the Verde Companies in July 2017, we entered into a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $20.0 million (the "Verde Promissory Note"). The Verde Promissory Note required repayment in 18 monthly installments beginning in August 2017, and accrued interest at 5% per annum from the date of issuance. The Verde Promissory Note, including principal and interest, was unsecured, but was guaranteed by us. In January 2018, in connection with the Earnout Termination Agreement (defined below), we issued to the seller of the Verde Companies an amended and restated promissory note (the “Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note”), which amended and restated the Verde Promissory Note. The Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note matured in January 2019, and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Principal and interest were payable monthly on the first day of each month, with a portion of each payment going into an escrow account, which serves as security for certain indemnification claims and obligations under the Verde purchase agreement. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there was zero outstanding, respectively, under the Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note.
In January 2018, we issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $5.9 million in connection with an agreement to terminate the earnout obligations arising in connection with our acquisition of the Verde Companies (the “Verde Earnout Termination Note”). The Verde Earnout Termination Note matured in June 2019 and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Under the terms of the Verde Earnout Termination Note, we were permitted to withhold amounts otherwise due at maturity related to certain indemnifiable matters. A payment of $1.0 million was made to the seller of the Verde Companies in June 2019, and $4.9 million was withheld (the “Verde Holdback”) to be applied to indemnifiable matters. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there was zero outstanding under the Verde Earnout Termination Note.
The Verde Earnout Termination Note, the Verde Promissory Note, and the Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note are collectively referred to as the "Verde Notes."
11. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. This includes the credit standing of counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements.
We apply fair value measurements to our commodity derivative instruments based on the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels:
•Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Instruments categorized in Level 1 primarily consist of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivative instruments.
•Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices recorded in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived from observable market data by correlation or other means. Instruments categorized in Level 2 primarily include non-exchange traded derivatives such as over-the-counter commodity forwards and swaps and options.
•Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, including situations where there is little, if any, observable market activity for the asset or liability. The Level 3 category includes estimated earnout obligations related to our acquisitions.
As the fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3), the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. These levels can change over time. In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In these cases, the lowest level input that is significant to a fair value measurement in its entirety determines the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis by and their level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivative assets
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
Trading commodity derivative assets
|
—
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
108
|
|
Total commodity derivative assets
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
311
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivative liabilities
|
$
|
(5)
|
|
|
$
|
(7,655)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(7,660)
|
|
Trading commodity derivative liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(72)
|
|
Total commodity derivative liabilities
|
$
|
(5)
|
|
|
$
|
(7,727)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(7,732)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivative assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
Trading commodity derivative assets
|
—
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
169
|
|
Total commodity derivative assets
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
570
|
|
Non-trading commodity derivative liabilities
|
$
|
(1,666)
|
|
|
$
|
(18,772)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(20,438)
|
|
Trading commodity derivative liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total commodity derivative liabilities
|
$
|
(1,666)
|
|
|
$
|
(18,772)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(20,438)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We had no transfers of assets or liabilities between any of the above levels during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Our derivative contracts include exchange-traded contracts valued utilizing readily available quoted market prices and non-exchange-traded contracts valued using market price quotations available through brokers or over-the-counter and on-line exchanges. In addition, in determining the fair value of our derivative contracts, we apply a credit risk valuation adjustment to reflect credit risk, which is calculated based on our or the counterparty’s historical credit risks. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the credit risk valuation adjustment was a reduction of derivative liabilities, net of $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
12. Stock-Based Compensation
Restricted Stock Units
We maintain a Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP") for employees, consultants and directors of the Company and its affiliates who perform services for the Company. The purpose of the LTIP is to provide a means to attract and retain individuals to serve as directors, employees and consultants who provide services to the Company by affording such individuals a means to acquire and maintain ownership of awards, the value of which is tied to the performance of the Company’s Class A common stock. The LTIP provides for grants of cash payments, stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or units, bonus stock, dividend equivalents, and other stock-based awards with the total number of shares of stock available for issuance under the LTIP not to exceed 2,750,000 shares.
Restricted stock units granted to our officers, employees, non-employee directors and certain employees of our affiliates who perform services for the Company vest over approximately one year for non-employee directors and ratably over approximately one to four years for officers, employees, and employees of affiliates, with the initial vesting date occurring in May of the subsequent year. Each restricted stock unit is entitled to receive a dividend equivalent when dividends are declared and distributed to shareholders of Class A common stock. These dividend equivalents are retained by the Company, reinvested in additional restricted stock units effective as of the record date of such dividends and vested upon the same schedule as the underlying restricted stock unit.
The Company measures the cost of awards classified as equity awards based on the grant date fair value of the award, and the Company measures the cost of awards classified as liability awards at the fair value of the award at each reporting period. The Company has utilized an estimated 6% annual forfeiture rate of restricted stock units in determining the fair value for all awards excluding those issued to executive level recipients and non-employee directors, for which no forfeitures are estimated to occur. The Company has elected to recognize related compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the associated vesting periods.
Although the restricted stock units allow for cash settlement of the awards at the sole discretion of management of the Company, management intends to settle the awards by issuing shares of the Company’s Class A common stock.
Total stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was $2.5 million, $5.5 million and $5.9 million. Total income tax benefit related to stock-based compensation recognized in net income (loss) was $0.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Equity Classified Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units issued to employees and officers of the Company are classified as equity awards. The fair value of the equity classified restricted stock units is based on the Company’s Class A common stock price as of the grant date. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $2.4 million, $5.0 million and $5.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, in general and administrative expense with a corresponding increase to additional paid in capital. The following table summarizes equity classified restricted stock unit activity and unvested restricted stock units for the year ended December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares (in thousands)
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2019
|
829
|
|
$9.88
|
|
Granted
|
91
|
|
6.87
|
|
Dividend reinvestment issuances
|
34
|
|
8.85
|
|
Vested
|
(441)
|
|
6.27
|
|
Forfeited
|
(208)
|
|
10.73
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2020
|
305
|
|
$9.48
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2020, 441,075 restricted stock units vested, with 284,365 shares of Class A common stock distributed to the holders of these units and 156,710 shares of Class A common stock withheld by the Company to cover taxes owed on the vesting of such units. As of December 31, 2020, there was $1.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the Company’s equity classified restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.3 years.
Change in Control Restricted Stock Units
In 2018, the Company granted Change in Control Restricted Stock Units ("CIC RSUs") to certain officers that vest upon a "Change in Control", if certain conditions are met. The terms of the CIC RSUs define a "Change in Control" to generally mean:
–the consummation of an agreement to acquire or tender offer for beneficial ownership by any person, of 50% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the election of directors, or by any person of 90% or more of the then total outstanding shares of Class A common stock;
–individuals who constitute the incumbent board cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the board;
–consummation of certain reorganizations, mergers or consolidations or a sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of our assets;
–approval by our stockholders of a complete liquidation or dissolution;
–a public offering or series of public offerings by Retailco and its affiliates, as a selling shareholder group, in which their total interest drops below 10 million of our total outstanding voting securities;
–a disposition by Retailco and its affiliates in which their total interest drops below 10 million of our total outstanding voting securities; or
–any other business combination, liquidation event of Retailco and its affiliates or restructuring of us which the Compensation Committee deems in its discretion to achieve the principles of a Change in Control.
The equity classified restricted stock unit table above excludes unvested CIC RSUs as the conditions for Change in Control have not been met. The Company has not recognized stock compensation expense related to the CIC RSUs as the Change in Control conditions have not been met.
Liability Classified Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units issued to non-employee directors of the Company and employees of certain of our affiliates are classified as liability awards as the awards are either to a) non-employee directors that allow for the recipient to choose net settlement for the amount of withholding taxes dues upon vesting or b) to employees of certain affiliates of the Company and are therefore not deemed to be employees of the Company. The fair value of the liability classified restricted stock units is based on the Company’s Class A common stock price as of the reported period ending date. The Company recognized stock based compensation expense of $0.1 million, $0.5 million and $0.6 million for years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively, in general and administrative expense with a corresponding increase to liabilities. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company’s liabilities related to these restricted stock units recorded in current liabilities was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. The following table summarizes liability classified restricted stock unit activity and unvested restricted stock units for the year ended December 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares (in thousands)
|
Weighted Average Reporting Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2019
|
28
|
|
$9.23
|
|
Granted
|
36
|
|
9.57
|
|
Dividend reinvestment issuances
|
2
|
|
9.57
|
|
Vested
|
(29)
|
|
6.77
|
|
Forfeited
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Unvested at December 31, 2020
|
37
|
|
$9.57
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2020, 28,736 restricted stock units vested, with 8,514 shares of Class A common stock distributed to the holders of these units and 20,222 shares of Class A common stock withheld by the Company to cover taxes owed on the vesting of such units. As of December 31, 2020, there was $0.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the Company’s liability classified restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 1.2 years.
13. Income Taxes
We and our subsidiaries, CenStar and Verde Energy USA, Inc. ("Verde Corp") are each subject to U.S. federal income tax as corporations. CenStar and Verde Corp file consolidated tax returns in jurisdictions that allow combined reporting. Spark HoldCo and its subsidiaries, with the exception of CenStar and Verde Corp, are treated as flow-through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and, as such, are generally not subject to U.S. federal income tax at the entity level. Rather, the tax liability with respect to their taxable income is passed through to their members or partners. Accordingly, we are subject to U.S. federal income taxation on our allocable share of Spark HoldCo's net U.S. taxable income.
In our financial statements, we report federal and state income taxes for our share of the partnership income attributable to our ownership in Spark HoldCo and for the income taxes attributable to CenStar and Verde Corp. Net income attributable to non-controlling interest includes the provision for income taxes related to CenStar and Verde Corp.
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities. We apply existing tax law and the tax rate that we expect to apply to taxable income in the years in which those differences are expected to be recovered or settled in calculating the deferred tax assets and liabilities. Effects of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in income in the period of the tax rate enactment. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is not more likely than not that some or all of the benefit from the deferred tax asset will be realized.
The provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 included the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
10,722
|
|
|
$
|
10,511
|
|
|
$
|
3,862
|
|
State
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
3,675
|
|
|
1,099
|
|
Total Current
|
|
13,831
|
|
|
14,186
|
|
|
4,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
(4,668)
|
|
|
(2,792)
|
|
State
|
|
127
|
|
|
(2,261)
|
|
|
(92)
|
|
Total Deferred
|
|
1,905
|
|
|
(6,929)
|
|
|
(2,884)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
15,736
|
|
|
$
|
7,257
|
|
|
$
|
2,077
|
|
The effective income tax rate was 19%, 34%, and (17)% for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The following table reconciles the income tax benefit that would result from application of the statutory federal tax rate, 21%, 21%, and 21% for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 respectively, to the amount included in the consolidated statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Expected provision at federal statutory rate
|
$
|
17,630
|
|
|
$
|
4,509
|
|
|
$
|
(2,586)
|
|
(Decrease) increase resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-controlling interest
|
(6,464)
|
|
|
(1,329)
|
|
|
1,738
|
|
Class A Preferred Stock dividends
|
1,304
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
1,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intra-entity transfer of customer contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
473
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal income tax effect
|
4,145
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
428
|
|
Prior year tax adjustments
|
(993)
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
(31)
|
|
Non-deductible expenses
|
195
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
256
|
|
Other
|
(81)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
220
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
$
|
15,736
|
|
|
$
|
7,257
|
|
|
$
|
2,077
|
|
Total income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 differed from amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to pre-tax income primarily due to state income taxes and the impact of permanent differences between book and taxable income, most notably the income attributable to non-controlling interest, which gets taxed at the non-controlling interest partner level.
The components of our deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
2020
|
2019
|
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
Investment in Spark HoldCo
|
$
|
25,751
|
|
$
|
28,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State net operating loss carryforward
|
—
|
|
140
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
416
|
|
1,669
|
|
Intangibles
|
1,393
|
|
—
|
|
Other
|
531
|
|
220
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
28,091
|
|
30,700
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
—
|
|
(808)
|
|
Property and equipment
|
—
|
|
(27)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
(131)
|
|
—
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
(131)
|
|
(835)
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets/liabilities
|
$
|
27,960
|
|
$
|
29,865
|
|
We periodically assess whether it is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient taxable income to realize our deferred income tax assets. In making this determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence and makes certain assumptions. We consider, among other things, our deferred tax liabilities, the overall business environment, our historical earnings and losses, current industry trends, and our outlook for future years. We believe it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be utilized, and accordingly have not recorded a valuation allowance on these assets.
The tax years 2013 through 2017 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject to income tax. An affiliate owned by our Founder would be responsible for any audit adjustments incurred in connection with transactions occurring prior to July 2014 for Spark Energy, Inc. and Spark HoldCo.
Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement methodology for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019 there was no liability, and for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, there was no expense recorded for interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions or unrecognized tax positions. Additionally, the Company does not have unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.
14. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we may be involved in legal, tax, regulatory and other proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation or other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Legal Proceedings
Below is a summary of our currently pending material legal proceedings. We are subject to lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. The following legal proceedings are in various stages and are subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of material factual and legal issues. Accordingly, unless otherwise specifically noted, we cannot currently predict the manner and timing of the resolutions of these legal proceedings or estimate a range of possible losses or a minimum loss that could result from an adverse verdict in a potential lawsuit. While the lawsuits and claims are asserted for amounts that may be material should an unfavorable outcome occur, management does not currently expect that any currently pending matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Consumer Lawsuits
Similar to other energy service companies (“ESCOs”) operating in the industry, from time-to-time, the Company is subject to class action lawsuits in various jurisdictions where the Company sells natural gas and electricity.
Variable Rate Cases
In the cases referred to as Variable Rate Cases, such actions involve consumers alleging they paid higher rates than they would have if they stayed with their default utility. The underlying claims of each case are similar; however, because numerous cases have been brought in several different jurisdictions, the varying applicable case law, the varying facts and stages of each case, the Company agreed to mediate in two aggregated mediations to avoid duplicative defense costs in numerous jurisdictions. The Company continues to deny the allegations asserted by Plaintiffs and intends to vigorously defend these matters.
In August 2020, the Company participated in mediation which covered three Spark brand matters: (1) Janet Rolland et al v. Spark Energy, LLC (D.N.J. Apr. 2017); (2) Burger v. Spark Energy Gas, LLC (N.D. Ill. Dec. 2019); and (3)
Local 901 v. Spark Energy, LLC (Sup .Ct. Allen County, Indiana Aug. 2019). The Company is working with the mediator to find a mediated resolution to these cases, but is simultaneously continuing to defend the cases in the respective courts, which includes the case Panzer v. Verde Energy, USA Inc. and Oasis Power, LLC (E.D. Pa Aug. 2019) brought by the same plaintiffs’ counsel participating in mediation. Given the ongoing mediation, discovery and current stage of these matters, we cannot predict the outcome of these cases at this time.
In December of 2020, the Company participated in mediation which covered five Verde brand matters: (1) Marshall v. Verde Energy USA, Inc. (D.N.J. Jan. 2018); (2) Mercado v. Verde Energy USA, Inc. (N.D. Ill. Mar. 2018); (3) Davis v. Verde Energy USA, Inc., et al. (D. Mass. Apr. 2019); (4) LaQua v. Verde Energy USA New York, LLC (E.D.N.Y. Jan. 2020); and (5) Abbate v. Verde Energy USA Ohio, LLC (S.D. Ohio Jun. 2020). The parties continue to work on a mediation resolution and the litigation has been stayed in these matters. Given the ongoing mediation, discovery and current stage of these matters, we cannot predict the outcome of these cases at this time.
On January 14, 2021, a purported variable rate class action was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Glikin, et. all v. Major Energy Electric Services, LLC, attempting to represent a class of all Major Energy customers (including customers of companies Major Energy acts as a successor to) in the United States charged a variable rate for electricity or gas by Major Energy during the applicable statute of limitations period up to and including the date of judgment. The Company believes there is no merit to this case and plans to vigorously defend this matter; however, given the current early stage of this matter, we cannot predict the outcome of this case at this time.
Corporate Matter Lawsuits
Saul Horowitz, as Sellers’ Representative for the former owners of the Major Energy Companies v. National Gas & Electric, LLC ("NG&E") and Spark Energy, Inc., is a lawsuit filed on October 17, 2017 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims of fraudulent inducement against NG&E, breach of contract against NG&E and Spark, and tortious interference with contract against Spark related to a membership interest purchase agreement, subsequent dropdown, and associated earnout agreements with the Major Energy Companies' former owners. The relief sought includes unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and attorneys’ fees. This case went to trial during the first two weeks of March 2020 and all material has been submitted to the Judge for his decision. Given the trial was in Manhattan, New York, which was previously under a shelter-in-place order and is currently re-opening in phases, we are not able to predict when we receive a final decision on this matter. Spark and NG&E deny the allegations asserted by Plaintiffs and have vigorously defended this matter; however, we cannot predict the outcome or consequences of this case at this time. In addition, several smaller, related cases involving the same facts are pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the Major Energy escrowed indemnification monies and three Major Energy executive compensation agreements.
In addition to the matters disclosed above, the Company may from time to time be subject to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. Although there can be no assurance in this regard, the Company does not expect any of those legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Regulatory Matters
Many state regulators have increased scrutiny on retail energy providers, across all industry providers. We are subject to regular regulatory inquiries, license renewal reviews, and preliminary investigations in the ordinary course of our business. Below is a summary of our currently pending material state regulatory matters. The following state regulatory matters are in various stages and are subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of material factual and legal issues. Accordingly, we cannot currently predict the manner and timing of the resolution of these state regulatory matters or estimate a range of possible losses or a minimum loss that could result from an adverse action. Management does not currently expect that any currently pending state regulatory matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Connecticut. The Company worked with the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority (“PURA”) regarding compliance with requirements implemented in 2016 that customer bills include any changes to existing rates effective for the next billing cycle. PURA approved all of Company’s proposed settlements for all operating brands in Connecticut and refunds have been issued to all Connecticut customers. In addition, PURA is reviewing two of the Company’s brands in Connecticut, Spark and Verde, focusing on marketing, billing and enrollment practices. The Company is cooperating with PURA’s reviews of Spark and Verde.
Illinois. Spark Energy, LLC received a verbal inquiry from the Illinois Commerce Commission (“ICC”) and the Illinois Attorney General (“IAG”) on January 1, 2020 seeking to understand an increase in complaints from Illinois consumers. The Company met with the ICC and the IAG in February 2020 and plan to discuss a compliance plan to ensure its sales are in compliance with Illinois regulations. The parties also discussed possible restitution payments to any customers impacted by sales not in compliance with Illinois regulations.
Maine. In early 2018, Staff of the Maine Public Utilities Commission (“Maine PUC”) issued letters to Electricity Maine seeking information about customer complaints principally associated with historical door-to-door (“D2D”) sales practices. In late July 2018, the Maine PUC issued an Order to Show Cause and Electricity Maine responded in mid-August 2018. The Commission scheduled a procedural conference in early 2019 that resulted in no intervenors other than participation as a party by the Maine Office of Public Advocate. At the conference, the parties agreed on a procedural schedule, including a one-day evidentiary hearing. Following post-hearing discovery, Initial and Reply Briefs were filed on August 30, 2019 and September 10, 2019, respectively. The Maine PUC hearing examiner released its report in April 2020 alleging failures of compliance related to enrollment and marketing practices by Electricity Maine. The Company has been cooperatively working with the Maine Office of Public Advocate and the staff of the Maine PUC. The Company proposed a resolution of this matter which was presented to the Maine PUC for approval. In December 2020, the Maine PUC did not approve the settlement; however, the Company worked cooperatively with the Maine Office of Public Advocate and the staff of the Maine PUC on a revised settlement which was approved by the Maine PUC in February 2021.
New York.
New York Attorney General. Prior to the purchase of Major Energy by the Company, in 2015, Major Energy Services, LLC and Major Energy Electric Services were contacted by the Attorney General, Bureau of Consumer Frauds & Protection for State of New York relating to their marketing practices. Major Energy has exchanged information in response to various requests from the Attorney General and recently agreed to respond to additional questions via remote proceedings in October of 2020. The parties are in settlement negotiations at this time. While investigations of this nature may be resolved in a manner that allows the retail energy supplier to continue operating in New York with stipulations, there can be no assurances that the New York Attorney General will not take more severe action. Prior to the purchase of Major Energy by the Company, in 2015, Major Energy Services, LLC and Major Energy Electric Services were contacted by the Attorney General, Bureau of Consumer Frauds & Protection for State of New York relating to their marketing practices. Major Energy has exchanged information in response to various requests from the Attorney General. The Parties are in settlement negotiations at this time. While investigations of this nature may be resolved in a manner that allows the retail energy supplier to continue operating in New York with stipulations, there can be no assurances that the New York Attorney General will not take more severe action.
Ohio. Verde Energy USA Ohio, LLC (“Verde Ohio”) was the subject of a formal investigation by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (“PUCO”) initiated on April 16, 2019. The investigation asserted that Verde Ohio may have violated Ohio’s retail energy supplier regulations. Verde Ohio voluntary suspended door-to-door marketing in Ohio in furtherance of settlement negotiations with the PUCO Staff. On September 6, 2019, Verde Ohio and PUCO Staff executed and filed with PUCO a Joint Stipulation and Recommendation for PUCO’s review and approval, which sets forth agreed settlement terms, which included approximately $1.9 million in refunds to customers and a penalty of $0.7 million. The settlement was approved by PUCO on February 26, 2020, and the Joint Stipulation and Recommendation resolves all of the issues raised in the investigation. The Company has provided all refunds to customers and received final approval of its license recertifications in December 2020.
Pennsylvania. Verde Energy USA, Inc. (“Verde”) is the subject of a formal investigation by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement (“PPUC”) initiated on January 30, 2020. The investigation asserts that Verde may have violated Pennsylvania retail energy supplier regulations. The Company met with the PPUC in February 2020 to discuss the matter and to work with the PPUC cooperatively. Verde reached a settlement, which includes a civil penalty of $1.0 million and a $0.1 million contribution to the PPL hardship fund. On June 30, 2020, Verde and PPUC Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement filed a Joint Petition for Approval of Settlement and Statements in Support of that Joint Petition with the Commission. Verde is currently awaiting final approval of this settlement.
In addition to the matters disclosed above, in the ordinary course of business, the Company may from time to time be subject to regulators initiating informal reviews or issuing subpoenas for information as means to evaluate the Company and its subsidiaries’ compliance with applicable laws, rule, regulations and practices. Although there can be no assurance in this regard, the Company does not expect any of those regulatory reviews to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
Indirect Tax Audits
We are undergoing various types of indirect tax audits spanning from years 2014 to 2020 for which additional liabilities may arise. At the time of filing these consolidated financial statements, these indirect tax audits are at an early stage and subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of audit findings and corresponding responses.
As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 we had accrued $26.6 million and $29.2 million, respectively, related to litigation and regulatory matters and $1.2 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to indirect tax audits. The outcome of each of these may result in additional expense.
15. Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions with Affiliates
We enter into transactions with and pay certain costs on behalf of affiliates that are commonly controlled in order to reduce risk, reduce administrative expense, create economies of scale, create strategic alliances and supply goods and services to these related parties. We also sell and purchase natural gas and electricity with affiliates. We present receivables and payables with the same affiliate on a net basis in the consolidated balance sheets as all affiliate activity is with parties under common control. Affiliated transactions include certain services to the affiliated companies associated with employee benefits provided through our benefit plans, insurance plans, leased office space, administrative salaries, due diligence work, recurring management consulting, and accounting, tax, legal, or technology services. Amounts billed are based on the services provided, departmental usage, or headcount, which are considered reasonable by management. As such, the accompanying consolidated financial statements include costs that have been incurred by us and then directly billed or allocated to affiliates, as well as costs that have been incurred by our affiliates and then directly billed or allocated to us, and are recorded net in general and administrative expense on the consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding accounts receivable—affiliates or accounts payable—affiliates, respectively, recorded in the consolidated balance sheets. Transactions with affiliates for sales or purchases of natural gas and electricity, are recorded in retail revenues, retail cost of revenues, and net asset optimization revenues in the consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding accounts receivable—affiliate or accounts payable—affiliate recorded in the consolidated balance sheets.
Master Service Agreement with Retailco Services, LLC
Prior to April 1, 2018, we were a party to a Master Service Agreement with an affiliated company owned by our Founder. The Master Service Agreement provided us with operational support services such as: enrollment and renewal transaction services; customer billing and transaction services; electronic payment processing services; customer service, and information technology infrastructure and application support services. Effective April 1, 2018, we terminated the agreement, and these operational support services were transferred back to us. See "Cost
Allocations" below for further discussion of the fees paid to affiliates during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018 respectively.
Cost Allocations
Where costs incurred on behalf of the affiliate or us cannot be determined by specific identification for direct billing, the costs are allocated to the affiliated entities or us based on estimates of percentage of departmental usage, wages or headcount. The total net amount direct billed and allocated (to)/from affiliates was $(1.5) million, $(0.7) million and $10.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Of the amounts directly billed and allocated from affiliates, we recorded general and administrative expense of $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 related to telemarketing activities performed by an affiliate and $5.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 related to fees paid under the Master Service Agreement. Additionally, under the Master Service Agreement, we capitalized $0.5 million of property and equipment for the application, development and implementation of various systems during the year ended December 31, 2018.
Accounts Receivable and Payable—Affiliates
As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had current accounts receivable—affiliates of $5.1 million and $2.0 million, respectively, and current accounts payable—affiliates of $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Revenues and Cost of Revenues—Affiliates
Revenues recorded in net asset optimization revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 related to affiliated sales were $1.0 million, $2.4 million, and $2.4 million, respectively, and cost of revenues recorded in net asset optimization revenues in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 related to affiliated purchases were $0.2 million, $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. These amounts are presented as net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Acquisitions from Related Parties
In March 2018, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with an affiliate to acquire up to 50,000 RCEs for a cash purchase price of $250 for each RCE, or up to $12.5 million in the aggregate. A total of $8.8 million was paid in 2018 under the terms of the purchase agreement for approximately 35,000 RCEs. The acquisition was treated as a transfer of assets between entities under common control, and accordingly, the assets were recorded at their historical value at the date of transfer. The transaction resulted in less than $0.1 million and $7.1 million recorded in equity as a net distribution to affiliate as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Distributions to and Contributions from Affiliates
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we made distributions to affiliates of our Founder of $15.1 million, $15.1 million and $15.5 million, respectively, for payments of quarterly distributions on their respective Spark HoldCo units. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we also made distributions to these affiliates for gross-up distributions of $14.4 million, $19.7 million, and $16.5 million, respectively, in connection with distributions made between Spark HoldCo and Spark Energy, Inc. for payment of income taxes incurred by us.
Proceeds from Disgorgement of Stockholder Short-swing Profits
During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we recorded zero, $0.1 million, and zero, respectively, for the disgorgement of stockholder short-swing profits under Section 16(b) under the Exchange Act. The amount was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.
Subordinated Debt Facility
In June 2019, we and Spark HoldCo entered into a Subordinated Debt Facility with an affiliate owned by our Founder, which allows the Company to borrow up to $25.0 million. The Subordinated Debt Facility allows us to draw advances in increments of no less than $1.0 million per advance up to the maximum principal amount of the Subordinated Debt Facility. Advances thereunder accrue interest at 5% per annum from the date of the advance. As of December 31, 2020 and 2019, there was zero, respectively, in outstanding borrowings under the Subordinated Debt Facility. See Note 10 "Debt" for a further description of terms and conditions of the Subordinated Debt Facility.
Tax Receivable Agreement
Prior to July 11, 2019, we were party to a tax receivable agreement ("TRA") with affiliates. Effective July 11, 2019, the Company entered into a TRA Termination and Release Agreement (the “Release Agreement”), which provided for a full and complete termination of any further payment, reimbursement or performance obligation of the Company, Retailco and NuDevco Retail under the TRA, whether past, accrued or yet to arise. Pursuant to the Release Agreement, the Company made a cash payment of approximately $11.2 million on July 15, 2019 to Retailco and NuDevco Retail. In connection with the termination of the TRA, Spark HoldCo made a distribution of approximately $16.3 million on July 15, 2019 to Retailco and NuDevco Retail under the Spark HoldCo Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, as amended.
The TRA generally provided for the payment by us to affiliates of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we realized or would realize (or were deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in future periods as a result of (i) any tax basis increases resulting from the initial purchase by us of Spark HoldCo units from entities owned by our Founder, (ii) any tax basis increases resulting from the exchange of Spark HoldCo units for shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the Exchange Right (or resulting from an exchange of Spark HoldCo units for cash pursuant to the Cash Option) and (iii) any imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments we made under the TRA. We retained the benefit of the remaining 15% of these tax savings.
For the four-quarter periods ending September 30, 2016, 2017, and 2018, we met the threshold coverage ratio required to fund the payments required under the TRA. Our affiliates, however, granted us the right to defer the TRA payment related to the four-quarter period ending September 30, 2016 until May 2018. In April, May, and December of 2018, we paid a total of $6.2 million related to our obligations under the TRA for the 2015, 2016, and 2017 tax years.
16. Segment Reporting
Our determination of reportable business segments considers the strategic operating units under which we make financial decisions, allocate resources and assess performance of our business. Our reportable business segments are retail electricity and retail natural gas. The retail electricity segment consists of electricity sales and transmission to residential and commercial customers. The retail natural gas segment consists of natural gas sales to, and natural gas transportation and distribution for, residential and commercial customers. Corporate and other consists of expenses and assets of the retail electricity and natural gas segments that are managed at a consolidated level such as general and administrative expenses. Asset optimization activities are also included in Corporate and other.
For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we recorded asset optimization revenues of $24.8 million, $62.8 million and $113.7 million and asset optimization cost of revenues of $25.5 million, $60.0 million and $109.2 million, respectively, which are presented on a net basis in asset optimization revenues.
We use retail gross margin to assess the performance of our operating segments. Retail gross margin is defined as operating income (loss) plus (i) depreciation and amortization expenses and (ii) general and administrative expenses, less (i) net asset optimization revenues (expenses), (ii) net gains (losses) on non-trading derivative
instruments, and (iii) net current period cash settlements on non-trading derivative instruments. We deduct net gains (losses) on non-trading derivative instruments, excluding current period cash settlements, from the retail gross margin calculation in order to remove the non-cash impact of net gains and losses on these derivative instruments. Retail gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, operating income (loss), as determined in accordance with GAAP.
Below is a reconciliation of retail gross margin to income (loss) before income tax expense (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
2018
|
Reconciliation of Retail Gross Margin to Income (loss) before taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
$
|
83,954
|
|
|
$
|
21,470
|
|
|
$
|
(12,315)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on disposal of eRex
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4,862)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total other income/(expense)
|
|
(423)
|
|
|
(1,250)
|
|
|
(749)
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
5,266
|
|
|
8,621
|
|
|
9,410
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
88,797
|
|
|
23,979
|
|
|
(3,654)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
30,767
|
|
|
40,987
|
|
|
52,658
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
90,734
|
|
|
133,534
|
|
|
111,431
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset optimization (expense) revenue
|
|
(657)
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
4,511
|
|
Net, losses on non-trading derivative instruments
|
|
(23,439)
|
|
|
(67,955)
|
|
|
(19,571)
|
|
Net, cash settlements on non-trading derivative instruments
|
|
37,921
|
|
|
42,944
|
|
|
(9,614)
|
|
Retail Gross Margin
|
|
$
|
196,473
|
|
|
$
|
220,740
|
|
|
$
|
185,109
|
|
Financial data for business segments are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2020
|
|
Retail
Electricity
|
|
Retail
Natural Gas
|
|
Corporate
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
Total Revenues
|
$
|
461,393
|
|
|
$
|
94,154
|
|
|
$
|
(657)
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
554,890
|
|
Retail cost of revenues
|
306,012
|
|
|
38,580
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
344,592
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset optimization revenue
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(657)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(657)
|
|
Net, losses on non-trading derivative instruments
|
(23,242)
|
|
|
(197)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(23,439)
|
|
Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives
|
35,390
|
|
|
2,531
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37,921
|
|
Retail gross margin
|
$
|
143,233
|
|
|
$
|
53,240
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
196,473
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
2,906,139
|
|
|
$
|
941,569
|
|
|
$
|
318,865
|
|
|
$
|
(3,799,906)
|
|
|
$
|
366,667
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
117,813
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
Retail
Electricity
|
|
Retail
Natural Gas
|
|
Corporate
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
Total Revenues
|
$
|
688,451
|
|
|
$
|
122,503
|
|
|
$
|
2,771
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
813,725
|
|
Retail cost of revenues
|
552,250
|
|
|
62,975
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
615,225
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset optimization expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,771
|
|
Net, losses on non-trading derivative instruments
|
(66,180)
|
|
|
(1,775)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(67,955)
|
|
Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives
|
41,841
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
42,944
|
|
Retail gross margin
|
$
|
160,540
|
|
|
$
|
60,200
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
220,740
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
2,524,884
|
|
|
$
|
820,601
|
|
|
$
|
341,411
|
|
|
$
|
(3,263,928)
|
|
|
$
|
422,968
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
117,813
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
Retail
Electricity
|
|
Retail
Natural Gas
|
|
Corporate
and Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
Total Revenues
|
$
|
863,451
|
|
|
$
|
137,966
|
|
|
$
|
4,511
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,005,928
|
|
Retail cost of revenues
|
762,771
|
|
|
82,722
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
845,493
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net asset optimization expense
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,511
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,511
|
|
Net, Losses on non-trading derivative instruments
|
(15,200)
|
|
|
(4,371)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(19,571)
|
|
Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives
|
(8,788)
|
|
|
(826)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9,614)
|
|
Retail gross margin
|
$
|
124,668
|
|
|
$
|
60,441
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
185,109
|
|
Total Assets
|
$
|
1,857,790
|
|
|
$
|
649,969
|
|
|
$
|
361,697
|
|
|
$
|
(2,380,718)
|
|
|
$
|
488,738
|
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
117,813
|
|
|
$
|
2,530
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
120,343
|
|
Significant Customers
For each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we did not have any significant customers that individually accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated retail revenue.
Significant Suppliers
For each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, we had one, one, and two significant suppliers that individually accounted for more than 10% of our consolidated retail cost of revenues. For each of the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, these suppliers accounted for 11%, 10% and 28% of our consolidated cost of revenue.
17. Equity Method Investment
Investment in eREX Spark Marketing Co., Ltd
Prior to November 2019, we, together with eREX Co., Ltd., a Japanese company, were party to an agreement ("eREX JV Agreement") for a joint venture, eREX Spark Marketing Co., Ltd ("ESM"). As part of this agreement, we made contributions of 156.4 million Japanese Yen, or $1.4 million, for a 20% ownership interest in ESM. We were entitled to share in 30% of the dividends distributed by ESM for the first year a qualifying dividend was paid and for the subsequent four years thereafter. After this period, dividends were to be distributed proportionately with the equity ownership of ESM. ESM's board of directors consists of four directors, one of whom was appointed by us. In November 2019, Spark HoldCo, LLC entered into a share purchase agreement with eREX Co., Ltd. In accordance with the agreement, Spark HoldCo, LLC sold its shares which represented 20% ownership interest in ESM for $8.4 million. The disposal of ESM resulted in a non-recurring gain of $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. Based on our significant influence, as reflected by the 20% equity ownership and 25% control of the ESM board of directors, we recorded the investment in ESM as an equity method investment.
Our investment in ESM was $3.1 million as of December 31, 2018, reflecting contributions made by us through December 31, 2018 and our proportionate share of earnings as determined under the HLBV method as of December 31, 2018, and recorded in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. There were no basis differences between our initial contribution and the underlying net assets of ESM. We recorded our proportionate share of ESM's earnings of $0.8 million in our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2019.
18. Subsequent Events
Extreme Winter Weather Event
In February 2021, the U.S. experienced winter storm Uri, an unprecedented storm bringing extreme cold temperatures to the central U.S., including Texas. As a result of increased power demand for customers across the state of Texas and power generation disruptions during the weather event, power and ancillary costs in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas ("ERCOT") service area reached or exceeded maximum allowed clearing prices. At the time of filing these consolidated financial statements, we expect the impact of winter storm Uri will result in a significant loss that will be reflected in our first quarter 2021 results of operations. However, uncertainty exists with respect to the financial impact of the weather event due in part to outstanding pricing and volume settlement data from ERCOT; the results of formal disputes regarding pricing and volume settlement data received to date, for which we are exploring all legal options; and any corrective action by the State of Texas, ERCOT, the Railroad Commission of Texas, or the Public Utility Commission of Texas. Possible action may include resettling pricing across the supply chain (i.e. fuel supply, wholesale pricing of generation, or allocating the financial impacts of market-wide load shed ratably across all retail market participants). During the winter storm Uri event, we were required to post a significant amount of collateral with ERCOT. Despite these posting requirements, we consistently maintained, and continue to maintain, sufficient liquidity to conduct our operations in the ordinary course.
Declaration of Dividends
On January 21, 2021, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18125 per share to holders of record of our Class A common stock on March 1, 2021, which will be paid on March 15, 2021.
We also declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.546875 per share to holders of record of the Series A Preferred Stock on January 21, 2021. The dividend will be paid on April 15, 2021 to holders of record on April 1, 2021.
Senior Credit Facility Commitment Increase
On January 19, 2021, we increased the total commitments under our Senior Credit Facility to $227.5 million.