| |
| |
| UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION |
| Washington, D.C. 20549 |
| |
| | | | | |
| | | FORM 10-Q | | |
☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2020
□ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-36559
Spark Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Delaware | | | | 46-5453215 |
| (State or other jurisdiction of | | | | (I.R.S. Employer |
| incorporation or organization) | | | | Identification No.) |
12140 Wickchester Ln, Suite 100
Houston, Texas 77079
(Address of principal executive offices)
(713) 600-2600
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
| |
| | | |
| Title of each class | Trading Symbols(s) | Name of exchange on which registered |
| Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share | SPKE | The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
| 8.75% Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate | SPKEP | The NASDAQ Global Select Market |
| | | |
| Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share | | |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ⌧ No □
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes ⌧ No □
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer □ Accelerated filer ⌧
Non-accelerated filer □ Smaller reporting company □
Emerging Growth Company □
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. □
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes □ No ⌧
There were 14,379,553 shares of outstanding There were 14,509,380 shares of Class A common stock, 20,800,000 shares of Class B common stock and 3,607,571 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding as of May 4, 2020.
| |
| | | |
| SPARK ENERGY, INC. | | |
| INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q | | |
| For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2019 | | |
| For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2020 | | |
| | | Page No. |
| PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION | | |
| ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | | |
| | | |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF MARCH 31, 2020 AND DECEMBER 31, 2019 (unaudited) | | 3 |
| | | |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 (unaudited) | | 4 |MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 AND 2019 (unaudited) | | 4 |
| | | |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 (unaudited) | | 5 |MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 AND 2019 (unaudited) | | 5 |
| | | |
| CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2019 AND 2018 THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 AND 2019 (unaudited) | | 7 |
| | | |
| NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited) | | 8 |
| | | |
| ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS | | 32 |
| ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK | | 48 |
| ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES | | 50 |
| PART II. OTHER INFORMATION | | 51 |
| ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | | 51 |
| ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS | | 51 |
| ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS | | 53 |
| ITEM 6. EXHIBITS | | 55 |
| SIGNATURES | | 57 |
1
Table of Contents
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this "Report") contains forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control. These forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology including "may," "should," "likely," "will," "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "continue," "plan," "intend," "project," or other similar words. All statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this Report, regarding strategy, future operations, financial position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans, objectives and beliefs of management are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places in this Report and may include statements about expected impacts of COVID-19, business strategy and prospects for growth, customer acquisition costs, legal proceedings, ability to pay cash dividends, cash flow generation and liquidity, availability of terms of capital, competition and government regulation and general economic conditions. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot give any assurance that such expectations will prove correct.
The forward-looking statements in this Report are subject to risks and uncertainties. Important factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
| | |
| | potential risks and uncertainties relating to the ultimate impact of COVID-19, including the geographic spread, the severity of the disease, the duration of the COVID-19 outbreak, actions that may be taken by governmental authorities to contain the COVID-19 outbreak or to treat its impact, and the potential negative impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and financial markets; |
| | |
| | changes in commodity prices; |
| | |
| | the sufficiency of risk management and hedging policies and practices; |
| | |
| | the impact of extreme and unpredictable weather conditions, including hurricanes and other natural disasters; |
| | |
| | federal, state and local regulations, including the industry's ability to address or adapt to potentially restrictive new regulations that may be enacted by public utility commissions; |
| | |
| | our ability to borrow funds and access credit markets; |
| | |
| | restrictions in our debt agreements and collateral requirements; |
| | |
| | credit risk with respect to suppliers and customers; |
| | |
| | changes in costs to acquire customers as well as actual attrition rates; |
| | |
| | accuracy of billing systems; |
| | |
| | our ability to successfully identify, complete, and efficiently integrate acquisitions into our operations; |
| | |
| | significant changes in, or new changes by, the independent system operators ("ISOs") in the regions we operate; |
| | |
| | competition; and |
| | |
| | the "Risk Factors" in our Annual Report Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, in our Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2019, and 2019, in "Item 1A- Risk Factors" of this Report, and in our other public filings and press releases. |
You should review the risk factors and other factors noted throughout or incorporated by reference in this Report that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Report. Unless required by law, we disclaim any obligation to publicly update or revise these statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. It is not possible for us to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
2
Table of Contents
PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SPARK ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share counts)
(unaudited)
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | | | |
| Assets | | | |
| | | | |
| Current assets: | | | |
| | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 54,466 | | | $ | 56,664 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Restricted cash | 1,002 | | | 8,636 | |
| Restricted cash | 1,005 | | | 1,004 | |
| | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,995 at September 30, 2019 and $3,353 at December 31, 2018 | 101,672 | | | 150,866 | |$5,935 at March 31, 2020 and $4,797 at December 31, 2019 | 79,801 | | | 113,635 | |
| | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable-affiliates | 2,937 | | | 2,032 | |
| | | | | | |
| Inventory | 264 | | | 2,954 | |
| | | | | | |
| Fair value of derivative assets | 15 | | | 464 | |
| | | | | | |
| Customer acquisition costs, net | 6,759 | | | 8,649 | |
| | | | | | |
| Customer relationships, net | 12,676 | | | 13,607 | |
| | | | | | |
| Deposits | 6,327 | | | 6,806 | |
| | | | | | |
| Renewable energy credit asset | 32,504 | | | 24,204 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other current assets | 14,296 | | | 11,747 | |
| Other current assets | 10,161 | | | 6,109 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total current assets | 211,841 | | | 291,980 | |
| Total current assets | 206,915 | | | 236,128 | |
| | | | | | |
| Property and equipment, net | 3,297 | | | 3,267 | |
| | | | | | |
| Fair value of derivative assets | - | | | 106 | |
| | | | | | |
| Customer acquisition costs, net | 9,072 | | | 9,845 | |
| | | | | | |
| Customer relationships, net | 14,748 | | | 17,767 | |
| | | | | | |
| Deferred tax assets | 23,130 | | | 27,321 | |
| Deferred tax assets | 30,333 | | | 29,865 | |
| | | | | | |
| Goodwill | 120,343 | | | 120,343 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other assets | 4,924 | | | 5,647 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 398,402 | | | $ | 488,738 | |
| Total assets | $ | 389,632 | | | $ | 422,968 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities, Series A Preferred Stock and Stockholders' Equity | | | |
| | | | |
| Current liabilities: | | | |
| | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 45,708 | | | $ | 68,790 | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 34,654 | | | $ | 48,245 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable-affiliates | 934 | | | 1,009 | |
| | | | | | |
| Accrued liabilities | 23,755 | | | 10,845 | |
| Accrued liabilities | 35,891 | | | 37,941 | |
| | | | | | |
| Renewable energy credit liability | 37,918 | | | 33,120 | |
| | | | | | |
| Fair value of derivative liabilities | 4,460 | | | 6,478 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current payable pursuant to tax receivable agreement-affiliates | - | | | 1,658 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current contingent consideration for acquisitions | 1,328 | | | 1,328 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current portion of Note Payable | - | | | 6,936 | |
26,450 | | | 19,943 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other current liabilities | 1,741 | | | 1,697 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total current liabilities | 137,588 | | | 141,955 | |
| | | | | | |
| Long-term liabilities: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Fair value of derivative liabilities | 1,832 | | | 495 | |
| | | | | | |
| Payable pursuant to tax receivable agreement-affiliates | - | | | 25,917 | |
| | | | | | |
| Long-term portion of Senior Credit Facility | 95,000 | | | 123,000 | |
| | | | | | |
| Subordinated debt-affiliate | 10,504 | | | 10,000 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 197 | | | 217 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total liabilities | 229,626 | | | 307,686 | |
| Total liabilities | 234,617 | | | 265,667 | |
| | | | | | |
| Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, 20,000,000 shares authorized, 3,702,756 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2019 and 3,707,256 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 | 90,646 | | | 90,758 | |3,707,256 shares issued and 3,607,571 shares outstanding at March 31, 2020 and 3,707,256 shares issued and 3,677,318 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 88,282 | | | 90,015 | |
| | | | | | |
| Stockholders' equity: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Common Stock: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 120,000,000 shares authorized, 14,478,999 issued and 14,379,553 outstanding at September 30, 2019 and 14,178,284 issued and 14,078,838 14,494,981 shares issued and 14,395,535 shares outstanding at March 31, 2020 and 14,478,999 shares issued and 14,379,553 shares outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 145 | | | 145 | |
| | | | | | |
| Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share, 60,000,000 shares authorized, 20,800,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020 and 20,800,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 209 | | | 209 | |
| | | | | | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 52,710 | | | 51,842 | |
| | | | | | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (40 | ) | | (40 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Retained earnings | 3,849 | | | 1,307 | |
| Retained earnings | 814 | | | 1,074 | |
| | | | | | |
| Treasury stock, at cost, 99,446 shares at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 | (2,011 | ) | | (2,011 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Total stockholders' equity | 51,827 | | | 51,219 | |
| | | | | | |
| Non-controlling interest in Spark HoldCo, LLC | 14,906 | | | 16,067 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total equity | 78,130 | | | 90,294 | |
| Total equity | 66,733 | | | 67,286 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total liabilities, Series A Preferred Stock and Stockholders' equity | $ | 389,632 | | | $ | 422,968 | |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
SPARK ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Revenues: | | | |
| | | | |
| Retail revenues | $ | 207,341 | | | $ | 258,127 | | | $ | 625,300 | | | $ | 773,616 | |
| Retail revenues | $ | 166,360 | | | $ | 240,154 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization (expense) revenues | (254 | ) | | 348 | | | 2,242 | | | 3,798 | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | 321 | | | 2,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | || |
| Total Revenues | 207,087 | | | 258,475 | | | 627,542 | | | 777,414 | |
| Total Revenues | 166,681 | | | 242,706 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses: | | | | | | | |
| | | | || | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 123,867 | | | 193,409 | | | 477,881 | | | 645,954 | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 118,823 | | | 195,255 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| General and administrative | 27,629 | | | 25,695 | | | 94,352 | | | 83,522 | |
| General and administrative | 25,676 | | | 29,476 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,496 | | | 13,917 | | | 31,963 | | | 39,797 | |8,796 | | | 12,155 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total Operating Expenses | 160,992 | | | 233,021 | | | 604,196 | | | 769,273 | |
| Total Operating Expenses | 153,295 | | | 236,886 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating income | 46,095 | | | 25,454 | | | 23,346 | | | 8,141 | |
| Operating income | 13,386 | | | 5,820 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other (expense)/income: | | | |
| | | | | || | |
| Interest expense | (2,174 | ) | | (2,762 | ) | | (6,392 | ) | | (7,323 | ) |
| Interest expense | (1,553 | ) | | (2,223 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Interest and other income | 322 | | | (47 | ) | | 1,005 | | | 707 | |
| Interest and other income | 160 | | | 189 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Total other expenses | (1,852 | ) | | (2,809 | ) | | (5,387 | ) | | (6,616 | ) |
| Total other expenses | (1,393 | ) | | (2,034 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | 44,243 | | | 22,645 | | | 17,959 | | | 1,525 | |11,993 | | | 3,786 | |
| | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | 6,567 | | | 3,818 | | | 3,022 | | | 602 | |
| Income tax expense | 1,925 | | | 1,041 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 37,676 | | | $ | 18,827 | | | $ | 14,937 | | | $ | 923 | |
| Net income | $ | 10,068 | | | $ | 2,745 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Less: Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 22,142 | | | 12,060 | | | 5,736 | | | (3,524 | ) |5,589 | | | 1,963 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. stockholders | $ | 15,534 | | | $ | 6,767 | | | $ | 9,201 | | | $ | 4,447 | |4,479 | | | $ | 782 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Less: Dividend on Series A Preferred Stock | 1,500 | | | 2,027 | || 6,080 | | | 6,081 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock | $ | 13,508 | | | $ | 4,740 | | | $ | 3,121 | | | $ | (1,634 | ) |2,979 | | | $ | (1,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | | | | | |
| | | | || | | |
| Currency translation (loss) gain | $ | (45 | ) | | $ | 47 | | | $ | (143 | ) | | $ | (11 | ) |
| Currency translation loss | $ | - | | | $ | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||
| Other comprehensive (loss) income | (45 | ) | | 47 | | | (143 | ) | | (11 | ) |
| Other comprehensive loss | - | | | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Comprehensive income | $ | 37,631 | | | $ | 18,874 | | | $ | 14,794 | | | $ | 912 | |
| Comprehensive income | $ | 10,068 | | | $ | 2,710 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests | 22,116 | | | 12,089 | | | 5,652 | | | (3,531 | ) |5,589 | | | 1,943 | |
| | | | | | | | || | | |
| Comprehensive income attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. stockholders | $ | 15,515 | | | $ | 6,785 | | | $ | 9,142 | | | $ | 4,443 | |4,479 | | | $ | 767 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. per share of Class A common stock | | | |
| | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.94 | | | $ | 0.35 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | (0.12 | ) |
| Basic | $ | 0.21 | | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.93 | | | $ | 0.35 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | (0.12 | ) |
| Diluted | $ | 0.20 | | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Basic | 14,380 | | | 13,394 | | | 14,254 | | | 13,254 | |
| Basic | 14,381 | | | 14,135 | |
| | | | | | |
| Diluted | 14,514 | | | 13,394 | | | 14,429 | | | 13,254 | |
| Diluted | 14,784 | | | 14,135 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
SPARK ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2020 |
| | Issued Shares of Class A Common Stock | Issued Shares of Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Total Stockholders' Equity | Non-controlling Interest | Total Equity |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | 14,479 | | 20,800 | | (99 | ) | $ | 145 | | $ | 209 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | 2 | | $ | 46,157 | | $ | 1,307 | | $ | 45,806 | | $ | 44,488 | | $ | 90,294 | |(40 | ) | $ | 51,842 | | $ | 1,074 | | $ | 51,219 | | $ | 16,067 | | $ | 67,286 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Impact of adoption of ASC 326 | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 3,888 | | - | | 3,888 | | - | | 3,888 | |- | | (633 | ) | (633 | ) | - | | (633 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted stock unit vesting | 301 | | - | | - | | 3 | | - | | - | | - | | (1,107 | ) | - | | (1,104 | ) | - | | (1,104 | ) |
| Balance at January 1, 2020 | 14,479 | | 20,800 | | (99 | ) | 145 | | 209 | | (2,011 | ) | (40 | ) | 51,842 | | 441 | | 50,586 | | 16,067 | | 66,653 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock based compensation | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 9,201 | | 9,201 | | 5,736 | | 14,937 | |1,329 | | - | | 1,329 | | - | | 1,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment for equity method investee | - | Restricted stock unit vesting | 16 | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (59 | ) | - | | - | | (59 | ) | (84 | ) | (143 | ) |- | | (39 | ) | - | | (39 | ) | - | | (39 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated net income | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 12,179 | | - | | 12,179 | | - | | 12,179 | |- | | 4,479 | | 4,479 | | 5,589 | | 10,068 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions paid to non-controlling unit holders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (7,172 | ) | (7,172 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to Class A common stockholders ($0.18125 per share) | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (5,170 | ) | (2,606 | ) | (7,776 | ) | - | | (7,776 | ) |- | | (2,606 | ) | (2,606 | ) | - | | (2,606 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Changes in ownership interest | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (223 | ) | - | | (223 | ) | 223 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to Preferred Stockholders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,029 | ) | (4,053 | ) | (6,082 | ) | - | | (6,082 | ) |- | | (1,500 | ) | (1,500 | ) | - | | (1,500 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from disgorgement of stockholder short-swing profits | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 55 | | - | | 55 | | - | | 55 | |
| Changes in ownership interest | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (422 | ) | - | | (422 | ) | 422 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition of Customers from Affiliate | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |(10 | ) | (10 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at March 31, 2020 | 14,495 | | 20,800 | | (99 | ) | $ | 145 | | $ | 209 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (40 | ) | $ | 53,750 | | $ | 3,849 | | $ | 55,885 | | $ | 22,245 | | $ | 78,130 | |52,710 | | $ | 814 | | $ | 51,827 | | $ | 14,906 | | $ | 66,733 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
5
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2019 |
| | Issued Shares of Class A Common Stock | Issued Shares of Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Total Stockholders' Equity | Non-controlling Interest | Total Equity |
| Balance at December 31, 2018 | 14,178 | | 20,800 | | (99 | ) | $ | 142 | | $ | 209 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (38 | ) | $ | 42,329 | | $ | (7,053 | ) | $ | 33,581 | | $ | 18,124 | | $ | 51,705 | |2 | | $ | 46,157 | | $ | 1,307 | | $ | 45,806 | | $ | 44,488 | | $ | 90,294 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock based compensation | 63 | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 1,377 | | - | | 1,377 | | - | | 1,377 | |1,071 | | - | | 1,071 | | - | | 1,071 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated net income | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 15,534 | | 15,534 | | 22,142 | | 37,676 | |782 | | 782 | | 1,963 | | 2,745 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment for equity method investee | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (14 | ) | - | | - | | (14 | ) | (21 | ) | (35 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Gain on settlement of TRA, net of tax | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 12,179 | | - | | 12,179 | | - | | 12,179 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions paid to non-controlling unit holders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (3,770 | ) | (3,770 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to Class A common stockholders ($0.18125 per share) | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,606 | ) | (2,606 | ) | - | | (2,606 | ) |
(2,564 | ) | - | | (2,564 | ) | - | | (2,564 | ) || | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends to Preferred Stockholders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,026 | ) | (2,026 | ) | - | | (2,026 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Changes in ownership interest | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,135 | ) | - | | (2,135 | ) | 2,135 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | 14,479 | | 20,800 | | (99 | ) | $ | 145 | | $ | 209 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (57 | ) | $ | 53,750 | | $ | 3,849 | | $ | 55,885 | | $ | 22,245 | | $ | 78,130 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
6
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 |
| | Issued Shares of Class A Common Stock | Issued Shares of Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Total Stockholders' Equity | Non-controlling Interest | Total Equity |
| Balance at December 31, 2017 | 13,235 | | 21,485 | | (99 | ) | $ | 132 | | $ | 216 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | $ | 47,811 | | $ | 11,399 | | $ | 57,536 | | $ | 101,559 | | $ | 159,095 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock based compensation | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 3,596 | | - | | 3,596 | | - | | 3,596 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Restricted stock unit vesting | 258 | | - | | - | | 3 | | - | | - | | - | | (715 | ) | - | | (712 | ) | - | | (712 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated net income | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 4,447 | | 4,447 | | (3,524 | ) | 923 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment for equity method investee | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (4 | ) | - | | - | | (4 | ) | (7 | ) | (11 | ) |1,059 | | - | | 1,059 | | (1,059 | ) | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions paid to non-controlling unit holders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (23,701 | ) | (23,701 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to Class A common Stockholders ($0.54375 per share)| Dividends to Preferred Stockholders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,381 | ) | (4,852 | ) | (7,233 | ) | - | | (7,233 | ) |- | | (2,027 | ) | (2,027 | ) | - | | (2,027 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Proceeds from disgorgement of stockholder short-swing profits | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,027 | ) | (4,054 | ) | (6,081 | ) | - | | (6,081 | ) |46 | | - | | 46 | | - | | 46 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition of Customers from Affiliate | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (10 | ) | (10 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Changes in ownership interest | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (3,237 | ) | - | | (3,237 | ) | 3,237 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at September 30, 2018 | 13,493 | | 21,485 | | (99 | ) | $ | 135 | | $ | 216 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 43,047 | | $ | 6,940 | | $ | 48,312 | | $ | 70,445 | | $ | 118,757 | || Balance at March 31, 2019 | 14,241 | | 20,800
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2018 |
| | Issued Shares of Class A Common Stock | Issued Shares of Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Class A Common Stock | Class B Common Stock | Treasury Stock | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | Additional Paid-in Capital | Retained Earnings (Deficit) | Total Stockholders' Equity | Non-controlling Interest | Total Equity |
| Balance at June 30, 2018 | 13,493 | | 21,485 | | (99 | ) | $ | 142 | | $ | 209 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 46,715 | | $ | 219 | | $ | 45,241 | | $ | 63,327 | | $ | 108,568 | |45,769 | | $ | 62 | | $ | 44,159 | | $ | 41,591 | | $ | 85,750 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock based compensation | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 950 | | - | | 950 | | - | | 950 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | |
| Restricted stock unit vesting | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Consolidated net income | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 6,767 | | 6,767 | | 12,060 | | 18,827 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustment for equity method investee | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | 18 | | - | | - | | 18 | | 29 | | 47 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Distributions paid to non-controlling unit holders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (4,200 | ) | (4,200 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends paid to Class A common stockholders ($0.18125 per share) | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,381 | ) | (47 | ) | (2,428 | ) | - | | (2,428 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends to Preferred Stockholders | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (2,027 | ) | 1 | | (2,026 | ) | - | | (2,026 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Acquisition of Customers from Affiliate | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (981 | ) | (981 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Changes in ownership interest | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | - | | (210 | ) | - | | (210 | ) | 210 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at September 30, 2018 | 13,493 | | 21,485 | | (99 | ) | $ | 135 | | $ | 216 | | $ | (2,011 | ) | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 43,047 | | $ | 6,940 | | $ | 48,312 | | $ | 70,445 | | $ | 118,757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
SPARK ENERGY, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
9
Table of Contents
(unaudited)
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| Cash flows from operating activities: | | | |
| | | | |
| Net income | $ | 14,937 | | | $ | 923 | |
| Net income | $ | 10,068 | | | $ | 2,745 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows provided by operating activities: | | | |
| | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization expense | 8,796 | | | 12,159 | |
| | | | | | |
| Deferred income taxes | 34 | | | (749 | ) |
(468 | ) | | 59 | |
| Change in TRA liability | - | | | 79 | |
| | | | | | |
| Stock based compensation | 1,324 | | | 1,172 | |
| | | | | | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 250 | | | 268 | |
| | | | | | |
| Excess tax benefit related to restricted stock vesting | - | | | (101 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Change in Fair Value of Earnout liabilities | - | | | (63 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Bad debt expense | 9,185 | | | 8,480 | || Bad debt expense | 2,355 | | | 3,849 | |
| | | | | | |
| Loss on derivatives, net | 24,587 | | | 19,541 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current period cash settlements on derivatives, net | (16,293 | ) | | (7,106 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Other | - | | | (137 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | | |
| | | | |
| Decrease in accounts receivable | 30,847 | | | 16,129 | |
| | | | | | |
| Increase in accounts receivable-affiliates | (905 | ) | | (73 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Decrease in inventory | 2,690 | | | 3,643 | |
| | | | | | |
| Increase in customer acquisition costs | (1,345 | ) | | (5,789 | ) |
| Increase
| Decrease (increase) in prepaid and other current assets | 9,211 | | | (10,999 | ) |
(11,967 | ) | | (5,692 | ) |
| Increase in intangible assets-customer acquisitions | - | | | (86 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| (increase) decrease in other assets | (394 | ) | | 92 | |
| Decrease (increase) in other assets | 289 | | | (102 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (10,892 | ) | | (11,322 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Decrease in accounts payable-affiliates | (75 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Increase (decrease) in other current liabilities | 149 | | | 390 | |
| | | | | | |
| Increase in other non-current liabilities | (21 | ) | | 333 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 39,389 | | | 30,049 | |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from investing activities: | | | |
| | | | |
| Purchases of property and equipment | (536 | ) | | (254 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Verde working capital settlement | - | | | 470 | |
| | | | | | |
| Acquisition of Starion customers | (5,913 | ) | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| Acquisition of HIKO | - | | | (14,290 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Acquisition of Customers from Affiliate | - | | | (5,869 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | (536 | ) | | (6,123 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Cash flows from financing activities: | | | |
| | | | |
| Proceeds from (buyback) issuance of Series A Preferred Stock net of issuance costs paid | (111 | ) | | 48,490 | |
| Buyback of Series A Preferred Stock | (1,222 | ) | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| Borrowings on notes payable | 75,000 | | | 64,500 | |
| | | | | | |
| Payments on notes payable | (245,000 | ) | | (281,050 | ) |
| Payments on notes payable | (103,000 | ) | | (93,500 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net borrowings on subordinated debt facility | 504 | | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| Payment of the Major Energy Companies Earnout | - | | | (1,607 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Payments on the Verde promissory note | - | | | (1,036 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Proceeds from disgorgement of stockholders short-swing profits | - | | | 46 | |
| | | | | | |
| Restricted stock vesting | (1,348 | ) | | (2,589 | ) |
| Restricted stock vesting | (39 | ) | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| Payment of Tax Receivable Agreement liability | (11,239 | ) | | (3,577 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Payment of dividends to Class A common stockholders | (2,606 | ) | | (2,564 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Payment of distributions to non-controlling unitholders | (7,172 | ) | | (3,770 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Payment of Preferred Stock dividends | (2,011 | ) | | (2,027 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Payment to affiliates for acquisition of customer book | - | | | (10 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (41,050 | ) | | (38,361 | ) |
| Decrease
| (Decrease) increase in Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash | (2,197 | ) | | (14,435 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash-beginning of period | 57,668 | | | 49,638 | |
| | | | | | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and Restricted cash-end of period | $ | 55,471 | | | $ | 35,203 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | | | |
| | | | |
| Non-cash items: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Property and equipment purchase accrual | $ | 89 | | | $ | (123 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
55 | | | $ | 2 | || Holdback for Verde Note-Indemnified Matters | $ | 4,900 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Write-off of tax benefit related to tax receivable agreement liability - affiliates | $ | 4,157 | | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Gain on settlement of tax receivable agreement liability-affiliates | $ | (16,336 | ) | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid during the period for: | | | |
| | | | |
| Interest | $ | 5,245 | | | $ | 5,955 | |
| Interest | $ | 1,327 | | | $ | 2,099 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Taxes | $ | 465 | | | $ | (3,147 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
7
Table of Contents
SPARK ENERGY, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Formation and Organization
Organization
We are an independent retail energy services company that provides residential and commercial customers in competitive markets across the United States with an alternative choice for natural gas and electricity. Spark Energy, Inc. (the "Company") is a holding company whose sole material asset consists of units in Spark HoldCo, LLC ("Spark HoldCo"). The Company is the sole managing member of Spark HoldCo, is responsible for all operational, management and administrative decisions relating to Spark HoldCo's business and consolidates the financial results of Spark HoldCo and its subsidiaries. Spark HoldCo is the direct and indirect owner of the subsidiaries through which we operate. We conduct our business through several brands across our service areas, including Electricity Maine, Electricity N.H., Major Energy, Provider Power Massachusetts, Respond Power, Spark Energy, and Verde Energy.
Emerging Growth Company Status
The Company qualifies as an "emerging growth company" as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. An emerging growth company may take advantage of specified reduced reporting and other regulatory requirements. The Company will remain an "emerging growth company" until the last day of 2019.
2. Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP") and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") as it applies to interim financial statements. This information should be read along with our consolidated financial statements and notes contained in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (the "2019 Form 10-K"). Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are presented on a consolidated basis and include all wholly-owned and controlled subsidiaries. We account for investments over which we have significant influence but not a controlling financial interest using the equity method of accounting. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
In the opinion of the Company's management, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are necessary to fairly present the financial position, the results of operations, the changes in equity and the cash flows of the Company for the respective periods. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed.
Immaterial Corrections to Prior Year Financial Information
The condensed consolidated income statements and our statements of changes in stockholders' equity reflect immaterial adjustments, as disclosed in our 2018 Form 10-K, to the historical balances in additional paid-in capital, non-controlling interest, retained earnings, net (loss) income attributable to non-controlling interest, and earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. We made these adjustments in accordance with GAAP, to reflect the amounts the owners of our Class A and Class B common stock would receive, respectively, if the assets of our subsidiary, Spark HoldCo, were sold and its liabilities were settled at their recorded book values as of each balance sheet date. In addition, we adjusted income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 to make certain immaterial corrections to the allocation of income between non-controlling interests and
11
Table of Contents
income available for common shareholders. Our adjustments had no impact on the manner in which distributions were paid during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. The Company evaluated the materiality of the errors from quantitative and qualitative perspectives and concluded that the errors were immaterial to the Company's prior period interim and annual consolidated financial statements. Since the revision was not material to the prior period interim or annual consolidated financial statements, no amendments to previously filed interim or annual periodic reports were required. Consequently, the Company revised the historical condensed consolidated financial information presented herein.
Below are amounts as reported and as adjusted for each period presented (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | September 30, 2018 |
| | | As Reported | | Adjustments | | As Adjusted |
| Additional paid-in capital | | $ | 25,387 | | | $ | 17,660 | | | $ | 43,047 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retained earnings | | 2,885 | | | 4,055 | | | 6,940 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Stockholders' Equity | | 26,597 | | | 21,715 | | | 48,312 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-controlling interest in Spark HoldCo, LLC | | 94,368 | | | (23,923 | ) | | 70,445 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Total equity | | $ | 120,965 | | | $ | (2,208 | ) | | $ | 118,757 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
| Net income attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock | | $ | 3,582 | | | $ | 1,158 | | | $ | 4,740 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to non-controlling interests | | 13,218 | | | (1,158 | ) | | 12,060 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. stockholders | | $ | 5,609 | | | $ | 1,158 | | | $ | 6,767 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. per share of Class A common stock | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | 0.35 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted | | $ | 0.27 | | | $ | 0.08 | | | $ | 0.35 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
| Net loss attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock | | $ | (5,298 | ) | | $ | 3,664 | | | $ | (1,634 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests | | 140 | | | (3,664 | ) | | (3,524 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net income attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. stockholders | | $ | 783 | | | $ | 3,664 | | | $ | 4,447 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| Net loss attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. per share of Class A common stock | | | | | | |
| Basic | | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted | | $ | (0.40 | ) | | $ | 0.28 | | | $ | (0.12 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements requires estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the interim financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
Restricted Cash
As part of the acquisition of RCEs from Starion Energy, Inc., Starion NY Inc. and Starion Energy PA Inc. (collectively "Starion") in 2018, we funded an escrow account, the balance of which is reflected as restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheet. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the balance in the escrow account related to Starion acquisition was $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively. The balance remaining as of March 31, 2020 represents a holdback of amounts due to the seller for acquired customers that will be released to the seller in June 2020, subject to the conditions outlined in the asset purchase agreement.
Relationship with our Founder and Majority Shareholder
8
Table of Contents
W. Keith Maxwell, III (our "Founder") is the owner of a majority of the voting power of our common stock through his ownership of NuDevco Retail, LLC ("NuDevco Retail") and Retailco, LLC ("Retailco"). Retailco is a wholly owned subsidiary of TxEx Energy Investments, LLC ("TxEx"), which is wholly owned by Mr. Maxwell. NuDevco Retail is a wholly owned subsidiary of NuDevco Retail Holdings LLC ("NuDevco Retail Holdings"), which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Electric HoldCo, LLC, which is also a wholly owned subsidiary of TxEx.
In March 2020, the Board of Directors (the "Board") of the Company appointed W. Keith Maxwell III as interim Chief Executive Officer.
New Accounting Standards Recently Adopted
12
Table of Contents
There have been no changes to our significant accounting policies as disclosed in our 2019 Form 10-K, except as follows:
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment ("ASU 2017-04"). ASU 2017-04 simplifies the subsequent Measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under this update, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. However, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. ASU 2017-04 should be applied on a prospective basis and is effective for annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We adopted ASU 2017-04 effective January 1, 2019, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"). ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a current expected credit loss ("CECL") model, which is a new impairment model based on expected losses rather than incurred losses on financial assets, including trade accounts receivables. The model requires financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. ASU 2016-13
In June 2018, The FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Non-employee Share-Based Payment Accounting ("ASU 2018-07"). ASU 2018-07 primarily expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees. ASU 2018-07 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We adopted ASU 2018-07 effective January 1, 2019, and the adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.those fiscal years. We adopted ASU 2016-13 and the related amendments effective January 1, 2020, and the adoption resulted in $0.6 million adjustment to retained earnings on January 1, 2020.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) ("ASU 2016-02"). Under this new guidance, lessees are required to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of greater than twelve months. The guidance requires qualitative disclosures along with certain specific quantitative disclosures for both lessees and lessors. The FASB issued ASU No. 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases, ASU No. 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements, and ASU No. 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements, to provide additional guidance for the adoption of Topic 842. ASU 2016-02 and its related amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and are effective for interim periods in the year of adoption ASU 2016-02 should be applied using a modified retrospective approach, which requires lessees and lessors to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented with an option to use certain practical expedients, which we elected to use. We evaluated the impact of this new guidance and reviewed lease or possible lease contracts and evaluated contract related processes. We adopted ASU 2016-02 effective January 1, 2019 and recorded right-of-use assets and liabilities for our real estate operating leases of approximately $1.0 million.
Standards Being Evaluated/Standards Not Yet Adopted
Below are accounting standards that have been issued, but not yet been adopted by the Company at March 31, 2020. The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"). ASU 2016-13 requires entities to use a current expected credit loss ("CECL") model, which is a new impairment model based on expected losses rather than incurred losses on financial assets, including accounts receivables, loans, and held-to-maturity debt securities, among others. the model requires financial assets measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. the measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable forecasts. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, including In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes ("ASU 2019-12"). These amendments simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740. For public business entities, the amendments in ASU 2019-12 are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, The FASB also issued
13
beginning after December 15, 2020. We do not expect adoption of the new standard to have a material impact to our consolidated statement of operations.
subsequent amendments to the initial guidance: ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments ("ASU 2019-04") In April 2019, and ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Targeted Transition Relief ("ASU 2019-05") in May 2019. ASU 2019-04 provides clarifications and minor improvements related to these topics. ASU 2019-05 provides entities that have certain instruments with an option to irrevocably elect the fair value option in Subtopic 825-10, Financial Instruments - Overall, applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis for eligible instruments, upon adoption of Topic 326. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. We plan to adopt the new standard and related amendments on January 1, 2020, by recognizing the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an adjustment to The opening balance of retained earnings for any impact to the amount of expected credit losses on our reported accounts receivable balance, net, on our consolidated balance sheet.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting ("ASU 2020-04"). The amendments in ASU 2020-04 provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022, that an entity has elected certain optional expedients for and that are retained through the end of the hedging relationship. The amendments are effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. We do not expect adoption of the new standard to have a material impact to our consolidated statement of operations.
3. Revenues
Our revenues are derived primarily from the sale of natural gas and electricity to customers, including affiliates. Revenue is measured based upon the quantity of gas or power delivered at prices contained or referenced in the customer's contract, and excludes any sales incentives (e.g. rebates) and amounts collected on behalf of third parties (e.g. sales tax).
9
Table of Contents
Our revenues also include asset optimization activities. Asset optimization activities consist primarily of purchases and sales of gas that meet the definition of trading activities per FASB ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging. They are therefore excluded from the scope of FASB ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.
Revenues for electricity and natural gas sales are recognized under the accrual method when our performance obligation to a customer is satisfied, which is the point in time when the product is delivered and control of the product passes to the customer. Electricity and natural gas products may be sold as fixed-price or variable-price products. The typical length of a contract to provide electricity and/or natural gas is twelve months. Customers are billed and typically pay at least monthly, based on usage. Electricity and natural gas sales that have been delivered but not billed by period end are estimated and recorded as accrued unbilled revenues based on estimates of customer usage since the date of the last meter read provided by the utility. Volume estimates are based on forecasted volumes and estimated residential and commercial customer usage. Unbilled revenues are calculated by multiplying these volume estimates by the applicable rate by customer class (residential or commercial). Estimated amounts are adjusted when actual usage is known and billed.
The following table discloses revenue by primary geographical market, customer type, and customer credit risk profile (in thousands). The table also includes a reconciliation of the disaggregated revenue to revenue by reportable segment (in thousands).
14
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Reportable Segments |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 | | Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 |
| | Retail Electricity | | Retail Natural Gas | | Total Reportable Segments | | Retail Electricity | | Retail Natural Gas | | Total Reportable Segments |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Primary markets (a) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| New England | $ | 76,995 | | | $ | 1,631 | | | $ | 78,626 | | | $ | 110,870 | | | $ | 2,163 | | | $ | 113,033 | |
| New England | $ | 46,593 | | | $ | 7,054 | | | $ | 53,647 | | | $ | 76,234 | | | $ | 8,528 | | | $ | 84,762 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mid-Atlantic | 69,763 | | | 2,940 | | | 72,703 | | | 83,846 | | | 3,762 | | | 87,608 | |
| Mid-Atlantic | 45,842 | | | 15,804 | | | 61,646 | | | 66,811 | | | 21,369 | | | 88,180 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Midwest | 23,310 | | | 2,146 | | | 25,456 | | | 20,898 | | | 2,557 | | | 23,455 | |
| Midwest | 14,989 | | | 13,607 | | | 28,596 | | | 22,107 | | | 20,489 | | | 42,596 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Southwest | 26,942 | | | 3,614 | | | 30,556 | | | 30,568 | | | 3,463 | | | 34,031 | |
| Southwest | 14,344 | | | 8,127 | | | 22,471 | | | 16,940 | | | 7,676 | | | 24,616 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 197,010 | | | $ | 10,331 | | | $ | 207,341 | | | $ | 246,182 | | | $ | 11,945 | | | $ | 258,127 | |
| | $ | 121,768 | | | $ | 44,592 | | | $ | 166,360 | | | $ | 182,092 | | | $ | 58,062 | | | $ | 240,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer type | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial | $ | 69,081 | | | $ | 3,378 | | | $ | 72,459 | | | $ | 101,818 | | | $ | 4,650 | | | $ | 106,468 | |
| Commercial | $ | 40,015 | | | $ | 15,517 | | | $ | 55,532 | | | $ | 67,235 | | | $ | 19,867 | | | $ | 87,102 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | 134,763 | | | 6,696 | | | 141,459 | | | 151,918 | | | 7,068 | | | 158,986 | |
| Residential | 93,228 | | | 33,363 | | | 126,591 | | | 124,768 | | | 41,095 | | | 165,863 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Unbilled revenue (b) | (6,834 | ) | | 257 | | | (6,577 | ) | | (7,554 | ) | | 227 | | | (7,327 | ) |
| Unbilled revenue (b) | (11,475 | ) | | (4,288 | ) | | (15,763 | ) | | (9,911 | ) | | (2,900 | ) | | (12,811 | ) |
| | $ | 197,010 | | | $ | 10,331 | | | $ | 207,341 | | | $ | 246,182 | | | $ | 11,945 | | | $ | 258,127 | |
| | $ | 121,768 | | | $ | 44,592 | | | $ | 166,360 | | | $ | 182,092 | | | $ | 58,062 | | | $ | 240,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer credit risk | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| POR | $ | 136,683 | | | $ | 4,037 | | | $ | 140,720 | | | $ | 172,198 | | | $ | 5,013 | | | $ | 177,211 | |
| POR | $ | 84,913 | | | $ | 23,037 | | | $ | 107,950 | | | $ | 128,937 | | | $ | 28,979 | | | $ | 157,916 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-POR | 60,327 | | | 6,294 | | | 66,621 | | | 73,984 | | | 6,932 | | | 80,916 | |
| Non-POR | 36,855 | | | 21,555 | | | 58,410 | | | 53,155 | | | 29,083 | | | 82,238 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 197,010 | | | $ | 10,331 | | | $ | 207,341 | | | $ | 246,182 | | | $ | 11,945 | | | $ | 258,127 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
15
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Reportable Segments |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 | | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
| | Retail Electricity | | Retail Natural Gas | | Total Reportable Segments | | Retail Electricity | | Retail Natural Gas | | Total Reportable Segments |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Primary markets (a) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| New England | $ | 221,134 | | | $ | 13,311 | | | $ | 234,445 | | | $ | 305,894 | | | $ | 14,742 | | | $ | 320,636 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Mid-Atlantic | 191,077 | | | 29,643 | | | 220,720 | | | 229,329 | | | 39,112 | | | 268,441 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Midwest | 62,890 | | | 27,371 | | | 90,261 | | | 56,818 | | | 27,243 | | | 84,061 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Southwest | 64,777 | | | 15,097 | | | 79,874 | | | 84,487 | | | 15,991 | | | 100,478 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 539,878 | | | $ | 85,422 | | | $ | 625,300 | | | $ | 676,528 | | | $ | 97,088 | | | $ | 773,616 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer type | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial | $ | 196,015 | | | $ | 32,079 | | | $ | 228,094 | | | $ | 275,966 | | | $ | 39,826 | | | $ | 315,792 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | 356,950 | | | 64,307 | | | 421,257 | | | 415,022 | | | 73,138 | | | 488,160 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Unbilled revenue (b) | (13,087 | ) | | (10,964 | ) | | (24,051 | ) | | (14,460 | ) | | (15,876 | ) | | (30,336 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 539,878 | | | $ | 85,422 | | | $ | 625,300 | | | $ | 676,528 | | | $ | 97,088 | | | $ | 773,616 | |
| | $ | 121,768 | | | $ | 44,592 | | | $ | 166,360 | | | $ | 182,092 | | | $ | 58,062 | | | $ | 240,154 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| || | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer credit risk | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| POR | $ | 375,890 | | | $ | 45,260 | | | $ | 421,150 | | | $ | 473,438 | | | $ | 54,565 | | | $ | 528,003 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-POR | 163,988 | | | 40,162 | | | 204,150 | | | 203,090 | | | 42,523 | | | 245,613 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 539,878 | | | $ | 85,422 | | | $ | 625,300 | | | $ | 676,528 | | | $ | 97,088 | | | $ | 773,616 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(a) The primary markets include the following states:
| | |
| | New England - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire; |
| | |
| | Mid-Atlantic - Delaware, Maryland (including the District of Colombia), New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania; |
| | |
| | Midwest - Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio; and |
10
Table of Contents
| | |
| | Southwest - Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, and Texas. |
(b) Unbilled revenue is recorded in total until it is actualized, at which time it is categorized between commercial and residential customers.
We record gross receipts taxes on a gross basis in retail revenues and retail cost of revenues. During the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, our retail revenues included gross receipts taxes of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, respectively, and our retail cost of revenues include gross receipts taxes of $2.2 million and $2.7 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018,March 31, 2020 and 2019, our retail revenues included gross receipts taxes of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, and our retail cost of revenues included gross receipts taxes of $6.7 million and $7.8 million, respectively.
4. Acquisitions
Acquisition of HIKO
In March 2018, we entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement under which we acquired all of the membership interests of HIKO Energy, LLC ("HIKO"), a New York limited liability company, for a total purchase price of $6.0 million in cash, plus working capital. At the time of acquisition, HIKO had a total of approximately
16
Table of Contents
29,000 RCEs located in 42 markets in seven states. The acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method. Our preliminary allocation of the purchase price was based upon the estimated fair value of the tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition. The allocation of the purchase consideration is as follows (in thousands):
| |
| | | | |
| | Reported as of December 31, 2018 |
| Cash and restricted cash | $ | 375 | |
| | | | |
| Intangible assets-customer relationships | 6,031 | |
| | | |
| Net working capital, net of cash acquired | 8,465 | |
| | | |
| Fair value of derivative liabilities | (205 | ) |
| Total | $ | 14,666 | |
| | | | |
Acquisition from Related Parties
In March 2018, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with an affiliate pursuant to which we agreed to acquire up to 50,000 RCEs for a cash purchase price of $250 for each RCE, or up to $12.5 million in the aggregate. These customers began transferring after April 1, 2018 and are located in 24 markets in eight states. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we paid $8.8 million under the terms of the purchase agreement for approximately 35,000 RCEs. We do not anticipate any additional customer transfers or consideration will be paid on this transaction. The acquisition was treated as a transfer of assets between entities under common control, and accordingly, the assets were recorded at our affiliate's historical value at the date of transfer, which was $1.7 million The transaction resulted in $7.1 million recorded in equity as a net distribution to affiliate as of December 31, 2018. Of the $8.8 million paid to our affiliate, $1.7 million was an investing cash outflow, and the remaining $7.1 million was deemed a distribution to our non-controlling interest and classified as financing activity.
$1.7 million and $2.7 million, respectively.
Acquisitions of Customer Books
In October 2018, we entered into an asset purchase agreement pursuant to which we agreed to acquire up to 60,000 RCEs from Starion Energy Inc., Starion Energy NY Inc. and Starion Energy PA Inc. (collectively "Starion") for a cash purchase price of up to a maximum of $10.7 million. These customers began transferring in December 2018, and are located in our existing markets. As of September 30, 2019, a total of $8.0 million was paid under the terms of the purchase agreement for approximately 51,000 RCEs.
As part of the acquisition, we funded an escrow account, the balance of which is reflected as restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the balance in the escrow account was $1.0 million and $8.6 million, respectively.The balance remaining as of September 30, 2019 represents a holdback of amounts due to the seller for acquired customers that will be released to the seller in April 2020, subject to certain adjustments outlined in the asset purchase agreement.
4. Equity
Non-controlling Interest
We hold an economic interest and are the sole managing member in Spark HoldCo, with affiliates of our Founder, and majority shareholder and interim Chief Executive Officer holding the remaining economic interests in Spark HoldCo. As a result, we consolidate the financial position and results of operations of Spark HoldCo, and reflect the economic interests owned by these affiliates as a non-controlling interest. The Company and affiliates owned the following economic interests in Spark HoldCo at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2019, respectively.
17
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | |
| | The Company | Affiliated Owners |
| December 31, 2018 | 40.53 | % | 59.47 | % |
| March 31, 2020 | 41.07 | % | 58.93 | % |
| December 31, 2019 | 41.04 | % | 58.96 | % |
The following table summarizes the portion of net income (loss) and income tax expense (benefit) attributable to non-controlling interest (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | || | | |
| Net income (loss) allocated to non-controlling interest | $ | 25,003 | | | $ | 12,752 | | |$ | 7,108 | | | $ | (2,834 | ) |6,085 | | | $ | 993 | |
| | | | | | | | | || | | | | | |
| Income tax expense (benefit) allocated to non-controlling interest | 2,861 | | | 692 | | | 1,372 | | | 690 | |496 | | | (970 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest | $ | 22,142 | | | $ | 12,060 | | | $ | 5,736 | || $ | (3,524 | ) |5,589 | | | $ | 1,963 | |
| | | | | | | | | | || | | | | |
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
Holders of the Company's Class A common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all matters presented to our stockholders for their vote or approval, except as otherwise required by applicable law or by our certificate of incorporation.
Dividends declared for the Company's Class A common stock are reported as a reduction of retained earnings, or a reduction of additional paid in capital to the extent retained earnings are exhausted. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we paid $7.8 three months ended March 31, 2020, we paid $2.6 million in dividends to the holders of the Company's Class A common stock. This dividend represented a quarterly rate of $0.18125 per share on each share of Class A common stock.
In order to pay our stated dividends to holders of our Class A common stock, our subsidiary, Spark HoldCo is required to make corresponding distributions to holders of its units, including those holders that own our Class B common stock (our non-controlling interest holder). As a result, during the three months ended March 31, 2020, Spark HoldCo made corresponding distributions of $3.8 million to our non-controlling interest holders.
11
Table of Contents
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share ("EPS") is computed by dividing net income attributable to stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of Class A common shares outstanding for the period (the denominator). Class B common shares are not included in the calculation of basic earnings per share because they are not participating securities and have no economic interests. Diluted earnings per share is similarly calculated except that the denominator is increased by potentially dilutive securities.
18
Table of Contents
The following table presents the computation of basic and diluted income (loss) per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 (in thousands, except per share data):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Net income attributable to Spark Energy, Inc. stockholders | $ | 15,534 | | | $ | 6,767 | | | $ | 9,201 | | | $ | 4,447 | |4,479 | | | $ | 782 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Less: Dividend on Series A preferred stock | 1,500 | | | 2,027 | || 6,080 | | | 6,081 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock | $ | 13,508 | | | $ | 4,740 | | | $ | 3,121 | | | $ | (1,634 | ) |2,979 | | | $ | (1,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Basic weighted average Class A common shares outstanding | 14,380 | | | 13,394 | | | 14,254 | | | 13,254 | |14,381 | | | 14,135 | |
| | | | | | |
| Basic income (loss) per share attributable to stockholders | $ | 0.94 | | | $ | 0.35 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | (0.12 | ) |0.21 | | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock | $ | 13,508 | | | $ | 4,740 | | | $ | 3,121 | | | $ | (1,634 | ) |2,979 | | | $ | (1,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Effect of conversion of Class B common stock to shares of Class A common stock | - | | | - | || - | | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| Diluted net income (loss) attributable to stockholders of Class A common stock | $ | 13,508 | | | $ | 4,740 | | | $ | 3,121 | | | $ | (1,634 | ) |2,979 | | | $ | (1,245 | ) |
| | | | | | | | || | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| Basic weighted average Class A common shares outstanding | 14,380 | | | 13,394 | | | 14,254 | | | 13,254 | |14,381 | | | 14,135 | |
| | | | | | |
| Effect of dilutive Class B common stock | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Effect of dilutive restricted stock units | 403 | | | - | |
| | | | | | |
| Diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 14,514 | | | 13,394 | | | 14,429 | | | 13,254 | |14,784 | | | 14,135 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Diluted income (loss) per share attributable to stockholders | $ | 0.93 | | | $ | 0.35 | | | $ | 0.22 | | | $ | (0.12 | ) |0.20 | | | $ | (0.09 | ) |
| | | | | | | | || | | | | | | |
The computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2020 excludes 20.8 million shares of Class B common stock because the effect of their conversion was antidilutive. The Company's outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because they contain only contingent redemption provisions that have not occurred.
Variable Interest Entity
Spark HoldCo is a variable interest entity due to its lack of rights to participate in significant financial and operating decisions and its inability to dissolve or otherwise remove its management. Spark HoldCo owns all of the
12
Table of Contents
outstanding membership interests in each of our operating subsidiaries. We are the sole managing member of Spark HoldCo, manage Spark HoldCo's operating subsidiaries through this managing membership interest, and are considered the primary beneficiary of Spark HoldCo. The assets of Spark HoldCo cannot be used to settle our obligations except through distributions to us, and the liabilities of Spark HoldCo cannot be settled by us except through contributions to Spark HoldCo. The following table includes the carrying amounts and classification of the assets and liabilities of Spark HoldCo that are included in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
19
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2019 | December 31, 2018 |
| | March 31, 2020 | December 31, 2019 |
| | | |
| Assets | | |
| | | |
| Current assets: | | |
| | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 54,196 | | $ | 56,598 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | 101,672 | | 150,866 | |
| Accounts receivable | 79,801 | | 113,635 | |
| | | | | |
| Other current assets | 69,419 | | 64,476 | |
| | | | | |
| Total current assets | 205,704 | | 280,553 | |
| Total current assets | 203,416 | | 234,709 | |
| | | | | |
| Non-current assets: | | |
| | | |
| Goodwill | 120,343 | | 120,343 | |
| | | | | |
| Other assets | 36,787 | | 37,826 | |
| | | | | |
| Total non-current assets | 157,130 | | 158,169 | |
| | | | | |
| Total Assets | $ | 366,579 | | $ | 448,055 | |
| Total Assets | $ | 360,546 | | $ | 392,878 | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Liabilities | | |
| | | |
| Current liabilities: | | |
| | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 70,482 | | $ | 86,097 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Contingent consideration | 1,328 | | 1,328 | |
| | | | | |
| Other current liabilities | 80,107 | | 65,863 | |
| | | | | |
| Total current liabilities | 150,589 | | 151,960 | |
| | | | | |
| Long-term liabilities: | | |
| | | |
| Long-term portion of Senior Credit Facility | 109,000 | | 129,500 | |
| | | | | |
| Subordinated debt - affiliate | 10,504 | | 10,000 | |
95,000 | | 123,000 | |
| | | | | |
| Other long-term liabilities | 2,029 | | 712 | |
| | | | | |
| Total long-term liabilities | 97,029 | | 123,712 | |
| | | | | |
| Total Liabilities | $ | 229,596 | | $ | 280,169 | |
| Total Liabilities | $ | 247,618 | | $ | 275,672 | |
| | | | | | | |
6. Preferred Stock
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we issued an aggregate of 2,917 shares of Series A Preferred Stock under an at-the-market issuance sales agreement (the "ATM Agreement"). We received net proceeds of $0.1 million and paid compensation to the sales agent of less than $0.1 million with respect to these sales.
In January 2018, we issued 2,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock, plus accumulated and unpaid dividends, at a price to the public of $25.25 per share. The Company received approximately $48.9 million ($24.45 per share) in net proceeds from the offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and a structuring fee. Offering expenses of $0.5 million were recorded as a reduction to the carrying value of the Series A Preferred Stock
5. Preferred Stock
In May 2019, we commenced a share repurchase program (the "Repurchase Program") of our Series A Preferred Stock. We may make purchases of our Series A Preferred Stock under the Repurchase Program The Repurchase Program allowed us to purchase our Series A Preferred Stock through May 20, 2020, and there was no dollar limit on the amount of Series A Preferred Stock that may be repurchased, nor did the Repurchase Program obligate the Company to make any repurchases.
In November 2019, we amended and extended our Repurchase Program of our Series A Preferred Stock. The Repurchase Program allows us to purchase Series A Preferred Stock through December 31, 2020, at prevailing prices, in open market or negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, maximum share prices and other considerations. The Repurchase Program does not obligate us to make any repurchases and may be suspended at any time.
During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we repurchased 69,747 During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we repurchased 4,500 shares of Series A Preferred Stock at a weighted-average price of $17.51 per share, for a total cost of approximately $1.2 million.
13
Table of Contents
Holders of the Series A Preferred Stock have no voting rights, except in specific circumstances of delisting or in the case the dividends are in arrears as specified in the Series A Preferred Stock Certificate of Designations. The Series A Preferred Stock accrue dividends at an annual percentage rate of 8.75%, and the liquidation preference provisions of the Series A Preferred Stock are considered contingent redemption provisions because there are rights granted to
20
Table of Contents
the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock that are not solely within our control upon a change in control of the Company. Accordingly, the Series A Preferred Stock is presented between liabilities and the equity sections in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet.
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, we paid $2.0 million and $6.1 million, respectively,During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we paid $2.0 million in dividends to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. As of March 31, 2020, we had accrued $2.0 million related to dividends to holders of the Series A Preferred Stock. This dividend was paid on April 15, 2020.
A summary of our preferred equity balance for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 is as follows:three months ended March 31, 2020 is as follows:
| |
| | | | | |
| | | (in thousands) |
| | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | | $ | 90,015 | |
| | | | | |
| Accumulated dividends on Series A Preferred Stock | | (38 | ) |
| | | | |
| Repurchase of Series A Preferred Stock | | (1,695 | ) |
| | | | |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | | $ | 90,646 | |
| Balance at March 31, 2020 | | $ | 88,282 | |
| | | | | |
6. Derivative Instruments
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the price of electricity and natural gas, basis differences in the price of natural gas, storage charges, renewable energy credits ("RECs"), and capacity charges from independent system operators. We use derivative instruments in an effort to manage our cash flow exposure to these risks. These instruments are not designated as hedges for accounting purposes, and, accordingly, changes in the market value of these derivative instruments are recorded in the cost of revenues. As part of our strategy to optimize pricing in our natural gas related activities, we also manage a portfolio of commodity derivative instruments held for trading purposes. Our commodity trading activities are subject to limits within our Risk Management Policy. For these derivative instruments, changes in the fair value are recognized currently in earnings in net asset optimization revenues.
Derivative assets and liabilities are presented net in our condensed consolidated balance sheets when the derivative instruments are executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. Our derivative contracts include transactions that are executed both on an exchange and centrally cleared, as well as over-the-counter, bilateral contracts that are transacted directly with third parties. To the extent we have paid or received collateral related to the derivative assets or liabilities, such amounts would be presented net against the related derivative asset or liability's fair value. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had paid $1.1 million and zero, March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had paid $1.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively, in collateral. The specific types of derivative instruments we may execute to manage the commodity price risk include the following:
| | |
| | Forward contracts, which commit us to purchase or sell energy commodities in the future; |
| | |
| | Futures contracts, which are exchange-traded standardized commitments to purchase or sell a commodity or financial instrument; |
| | |
| | Swap agreements, which require payments to or from counterparties based upon the differential between two prices for a predetermined notional quantity; and |
| | |
| | Option contracts, which convey to the option holder the right but not the obligation to purchase or sell a commodity. |
The Company has entered into other energy-related contracts that do not meet the definition of a derivative instrument or for which we made a normal purchase, normal sale election and are therefore not accounted for at fair value including the following:
14
Table of Contents
| | |
| | Forward electricity and natural gas purchase contracts for retail customer load; |
| | |
| | Renewable energy credits; and |
| | |
| | Natural gas transportation contracts and storage agreements. |
21
Table of Contents
Volumes Underlying Derivative Transactions
The following table summarizes the net notional volumes of our open derivative financial instruments accounted for at fair value by commodity. Positive amounts represent net buys while bracketed amounts are net sell transactions (in thousands):
Non-trading
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| Commodity | Notional | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Commodity | Notional | | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | | | | | |
| Natural Gas | MMBtu | | 4,510 | | | 6,130 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Natural Gas Basis | MMBtu | | 5 | | | 42 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Electricity | MWh | | 4,678 | | | 6,015 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Trading
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| Commodity | Notional | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Commodity | Notional | | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | | | | | |
| Natural Gas | MMBtu | | 154 | | | 204 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Natural Gas Basis | MMBtu | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | |
Gains (Losses) on Derivative Instruments
Gains (losses) on derivative instruments, net and current period settlements on derivative instruments were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):
| |
| | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| |2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | |
| Gain on non-trading derivatives, net | $ | 12,528 | | |$ | 17,888 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| (Loss) gain on trading derivatives, net | (221 | ) | | 229 | |
| | | | | | |
| Gain on derivatives, net | 12,307 | | | 18,117 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives (1) | 12,764 | | | 1,035 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on trading derivatives | (43 | ) | | (113 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Total current period settlements on derivatives | $ | 12,721 | | | $ | 922 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes settlements of less than $(0.1) million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 related to non-trading derivative liabilities assumed in various acquisitions.
Three Months Ended March 31, |
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | |
| | 2019 || 2018 |2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Loss on non-trading derivatives, net | $ | (24,533 | ) | | $ | (19,803 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| (Loss) gain on trading derivatives, net | (54 | ) | | 262 | |
| | | | | | |
| Loss on derivatives, net | (42,690 | ) | | (1,371 | ) |
| Loss on derivatives, net | (24,587 | ) | | (19,541 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives (1) | 16,609 | | | 8,125 | |
| | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on trading derivatives | (1 | ) | | (100 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Total current period settlements on derivatives | $ | 16,608 | | | $ | 8,025 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Excludes settlements of less than $0.1 million and $(0.4) million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 related to non-trading derivative liabilities assumed in various acquisitions.
(1) Excludes settlements of $(0.3) million and $(0.9) million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 related to power call options.
(2) Excludes settlements of $(0.9) million and zero, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 related to power call options.
22
Table of Contents
Gains (losses) on trading derivative instruments are recorded in net asset optimization revenues and gains (losses) on non-trading derivative instruments are recorded in retail cost of revenues on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
15
Table of Contents
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
The following tables summarize the fair value and offsetting amounts of our derivative instruments by counterparty and collateral received or paid (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2020 |
| Description | Gross Assets | | Gross | | Net Assets | | Cash | | Net Amount |
| | | | Amounts | | | | Collateral | | Presented |
| | | | Offset | | | | Offset | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | $ | 12,685 | | | $ | (11,574 | ) | | $ | 1,111 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,111 | |2,647 | | | $ | (2,632 | ) | | $ | 15 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | 2 | | | (2 | ) | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Current Derivative Assets | 12,719 | | | (11,576 | ) | | 1,143 | | | - | | | 1,143 | |2,649 | | | (2,634 | ) | | 15 | | | - | | | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Non-current Derivative Assets | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Derivative Assets | $ | 13,207 | | | $ | (11,970 | ) | | $ | 1,237 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,237 | |
| Total Derivative Assets | $ | 2,649 | | | $ | (2,634 | ) | | $ | 15 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | March 31, 2020 |
| | |
| Description | Gross | | Gross | | Net | | Cash | | Net Amount |
| | Liabilities | | Amounts | | Liabilities | | Collateral | | Presented |
| | | | Offset | | | | Offset | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | $ | (20,014 | ) | | $ | 14,636 | | | $ | (5,378 | ) | | $ | 991 | | | $ | (4,387 | ) |(39,814 | ) | | $ | 11,809 | | | $ | (28,005 | ) | | $ | 1,555 | | | $ | (26,450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | (284 | ) | | 211 | | | (73 | ) | | - | | | (73 | ) |(126 | ) | | 126 | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Current Derivative Liabilities | (20,298 | ) | | 14,847 | | | (5,451 | ) | | 991 | | | (4,460 | ) |(39,940 | ) | | 11,935 | | | (28,005 | ) | | 1,555 | | | (26,450 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | (2,634 | ) | | 796 | | | (1,838 | ) | | 6 | | | (1,832 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Non-current Derivative Liabilities | (2,634 | ) | | 796 | | | (1,838 | ) | | 6 | | | (1,832 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Derivative Liabilities | $ | (24,375 | ) | | $ | 17,022 | | | $ | (7,353 | ) | | $ | 1,063 | | | $ | (6,290 | ) |(42,574 | ) | | $ | 12,731 | | | $ | (29,843 | ) | | $ | 1,561 | | | $ | (28,282 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| Description | Gross Assets | | Gross | | Net Assets | | Cash | | Net Amount |
| | | | Amounts | | | | Collateral | | Presented |
| | | | Offset | | | | Offset | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | $ | 18,649 | | | $ | (12,000 | ) | | $ | 6,649 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 6,649 | |570 | | | $ | (275 | ) | | $ | 295 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 295 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | 170 | | | (1 | ) | | 169 | | | - | | | 169 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Current Derivative Assets | 19,383 | | | (12,094 | ) | | 7,289 | | | - | | | 7,289 | |740 | | | (276 | ) | | 464 | | | - | | | 464 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | 9,657 | | | (6,381 | ) | | 3,276 | | | - | | | 3,276 | |333 | | | (227 | ) | | 106 | | | - | | | 106 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Non-current Derivative Assets | 9,657 | | | (6,381 | ) | | 3,276 | | | - | | | 3,276 | |333 | | | (227 | ) | | 106 | | | - | | | 106 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Derivative Assets | $ | 29,040 | | | $ | (18,475 | ) | | $ | 10,565 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 10,565 | |
| Total Derivative Assets | $ | 1,073 | | | $ | (503 | ) | | $ | 570 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 570 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
16
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| | |
| Description | Gross | | Gross | | Net | | Cash | | Net Amount |
| | Liabilities | | Amounts | | Liabilities | | Collateral | | Presented |
| | | | Offset | | | | Offset | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | $ | (21,391 | ) | | $ | 15,385 | | | $ | (6,006 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,006 | ) |(34,434 | ) | | $ | 12,859 | | | $ | (21,575 | ) | | $ | 1,632 | | | $ | (19,943 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | (491 | ) | | 19 | | | (472 | ) | | - | | | (472 | ) |(194 | ) | | 194 | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Current Derivative Liabilities | (21,882 | ) | | 15,404 | | | (6,478 | ) | | - | | | (6,478 | ) |(34,628 | ) | | 13,053 | | | (21,575 | ) | | 1,632 | | | (19,943 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivatives | (1,951 | ) | | 1,422 | | | (529 | ) | | 34 | | | (495 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivatives | (135 | ) | | 60 | | | (75 | ) | | - | | | (75 | ) |- | | | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Non-current Derivative Liabilities | (1,951 | ) | | 1,422 | | | (529 | ) | | 34 | | | (495 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Derivative Liabilities | $ | (22,088 | ) | | $ | 15,504 | | | $ | (6,584 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,584 | ) |(36,579 | ) | | $ | 14,475 | | | $ | (22,104 | ) | | $ | 1,666 | | | $ | (20,438 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
7. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consist of the following amounts (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Estimated useful | | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | Estimated useful | | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | lives (years) | | | | |
| Information technology | 2 - 5 | | $ | 22,595 | | | $ | 22,005 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Building and leasehold improvements | 2 - 5 | | - | | | 4,836 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Furniture and fixtures | 2 - 5 | | 1,802 | | | 1,802 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 24,397 | | | 23,807 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated depreciation | | | (21,100 | ) | | (20,540 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
| Property and equipment-net | | | $ | 3,297 | | | $ | 3,267 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Information technology assets include software and consultant time used in the application, development and implementation of various systems including customer billing and resource management systems. As of each of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, information technology includes $0.2 million and $0.6 million, respectively, of costs associated with assets not yet placed into service.
Depreciation expense recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of operations was $0.6 million and $1.0 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $1.8 million and $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.and 2018, respectively.$0.7 million, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
17
Table of Contents
8. Intangible Assets
Goodwill, customer relationships and trademarks consist of the following amounts (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| Goodwill | $ | 120,343 | | | $ | 120,343 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships-Acquired | | | |
| | | | |
| Cost | $ | 64,108 | | | $ | 99,402 | |
| Cost | $ | 64,083 | | | $ | 64,083 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated amortization | (37,713 | ) | | (63,208 | ) |
| Accumulated amortization | (42,760 | ) | | (40,231 | ) |
| Customer relationships-Acquired & Non-Compete Agreements, net | $ | 21,323 | | | $ | 23,852 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Customer relationships-Other | | | |
| | | | |
| Cost | $ | 17,056 | | | $ | 17,056 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated amortization | (8,113 | ) | | (9,290 | ) |
| Accumulated amortization | (10,955 | ) | | (9,534 | ) |
| Customer relationships-Other, net | $ | 6,101 | | | $ | 7,522 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Trademarks | | | |
| | | | |
| Cost | $ | 7,570 | | | $ | 8,502 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accumulated amortization | (2,139 | ) | | (2,794 | ) |
| Trademarks, net | $ | 5,947 | | | $ | 7,287 | |
| Trademarks, net | $ | 5,431 | | | $ | 5,708 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Changes in goodwill, customer relationships (including non-compete agreements) and trademarks consisted of the following (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Goodwill | | Customer Relationships- Acquired & Non-Compete Agreements | | Customer Relationships- Other | | Trademarks |
| | | | | | | | |
| Balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 120,343 | | | $ | 36,194 | | | $ | 6,865 | | | $ | 7,287 | |23,852 | | | $ | 7,522 | | | $ | 5,708 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Additions | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amortization | - | | | (9,799 | ) | | (4,835 | ) | | (1,340 | ) |
| Amortization | - | | | (2,529 | ) | | (1,421 | ) | | (277 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Balance at September 30, 2019 | $ | 120,343 | | | $ | 26,395 | | | $ | 8,943 | | | $ | 5,947 | |
| Balance at March 31, 2020 | $ | 120,343 | | | $ | 21,323 | | | $ | 6,101 | | | $ | 5,431 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Estimated future amortization expense for customer relationships and trademarks at March 31, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):
| |
| | | | |
| Year ending December 31, | |
| | |
| 2019 (remaining three months) | $ | 4,203 | |
| 2020 (remaining nine months) | $ | 10,490 | |
| | | | |
| 2021 | 13,142 | |
| | | |
| 2022 | 6,194 | |
| | | |
| 2023 | 605 | |
| | | |
| 2024 | 404 | |
| | | |
| > 5 years | 2,020 | |
| | | |
| Total | $ | 32,855 | |
| | | | |
18
Table of Contents
9. Debt
Debt consists of the following amounts as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | September 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | March 31, 2020 | | December 31, 2019 |
| | | | |
| Current: | | | |
| Note Payable-Verde Notes | $ | - | | | $ | 6,936 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Total current portion of debt | - | | | 6,936 | |
| | | | | | |
| Long-term debt: | | | |
| Senior Credit Facility (1) (2) | 109,000 | | | 129,500 | |
| | | | | | |
| Subordinated Debt | 10,504 | | | 10,000 | |
95,000 | | | 123,000 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total long-term debt | 119,504 | | | 139,500 | |
| Total long-term debt | 95,000 | | | 123,000 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total debt | $ | 119,504 | | | $ | 146,436 | |
| Total debt | $ | 95,000 | | | $ | 123,000 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the weighted average interest rate on the Senior Credit Facility was 4.14% and 4.71%, respectively.
(2) As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had $40.3 million and $49.4 (2) As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had $35.2 million and $37.4 million in letters of credit issued, respectively.
Capitalized financing costs associated with our Senior Credit Facility were $1.0 million and $1.3 million as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. Of these amounts, $0.9 million and $0.9 million are recorded in other current assets, and $0.1 million and $0.4 million are recorded in other non-current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
Interest expense consists of the following components for the periods indicated (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | || |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Senior Credit Facility | $ | 1,120 | | | $ | 1,423 | | | $ | 3,741 | | | $ | 3,895 | |
| Senior Credit Facility | $ | 911 | | | $ | 1,442 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subordinated debt | 162 | | | 13 | | | 166 | | | 20 | |
| | | | | | | | | | || |
| note Payable-Verde Notes | - | | | 288 | | | 230 | | | 978 | |
| Verde promissory note | - | | | 141 | |
| | | | | | |
| Letters of credit fees and commitment fees | 395 | | | 407 | | | 1,253 | | | 1,187 | |392 | | | 368 | |
| | | | | | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | 497 | | | 631 | || 1,002 | | | 1,243250 | | | 268 | |
| | | | | | |
| Subordinated debt | - | | | 4 | |
| | | | | | |
| Interest Expense | $ | 2,174 | | | $ | 2,762 | | | $ | 6,392 | | | $ | 7,323 | |
| Interest Expense | $ | 1,553 | | | $ | 2,223 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Senior Credit Facility
The Company, as guarantor, and Spark HoldCo (the "Borrower" and, together with each subsidiary of Spark HoldCo ("Co-Borrowers")) maintain a senior secured borrowing base credit facility (as amended, "Senior Credit Facility") that allows us to borrow on a revolving basis and has a maximum borrowing capacity of $217.5 million as of March 31, 2020. Subject to applicable sublimits and terms of the Senior Credit Facility, as amended, borrowings are available for the issuance of letters of credit ("Letters of Credit"), working capital and general purpose revolving credit loans ("Working Capital Loans"), and bridge loans ("Bridge Loans") for the purpose of partial funding for acquisitions. Borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility may be used to pay fees and expenses in connection with the Senior Credit Facility, finance ongoing working capital requirements and general corporate purpose requirements of the Co-Borrowers, to provide partial funding for acquisitions, as allowed under terms of the Senior Credit Facility, and to make open market purchases of our Class A common stock and Series A Preferred Stock.As of September 30, 2019, we had $109.0 million outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility, as well as $40.3 million of outstanding letters of credit.
The Senior Credit Facility will mature on May 19, 2021, and all amounts outstanding thereunder will be payable on the maturity date. Borrowings under the Bridge Loan sublimit, if any, will be repaid 25% per year on a quarterly basis (or 6.25% per quarter), with the remainder due at maturity. As of September 30, 2019, there were no Bridge Loans outstanding.March 31, 2020, there was zero Bridge Loans outstanding.
26
Table of Contents
At our election, the interest rate for Working Capital Loans and Letters of Credit under the Senior Credit Facility is generally determined by reference to the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of up to 3.00% per annum (based on the prevailing utilization) or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of up to 2.00% per annum (based on the prevailing utilization). The alternate base rate is equal to the highest of (i) the prime rate (as published
19
Table of Contents
in the Wall Street Journal), (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum, or (iii) the reference Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%.
Bridge Loan borrowings, if any, under the Senior Credit Facility are generally determined by reference to the Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin of 3.75% per annum or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of 2.75% per annum. The alternate base rate is equal to the highest of (i) the prime rate (as published in the Wall Street Journal), (ii) the federal funds rate plus 0.50% per annum, or (iii) the reference Eurodollar rate plus 1.00%.
The Co-Borrowers pay a commitment fee of 0.50% quarterly in arrears on the unused portion of the Senior Credit Facility. In addition, the Co-Borrowers are subject to additional fees including an upfront fee, an annual agency fee, and letter of credit fees based on a percentage of the face amount of letters of credit payable to any syndicate member that issues a letter of credit.
The Senior Credit Facility contains covenants that, among other things, require the maintenance of specified ratios or conditions including:
| | |
| | Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio. We must maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.25 to 1.00. The Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio is defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA to (b) the sum of consolidated (with respect to the Company and the Co-Borrowers) interest expense (other than interest paid-in-kind in respect of certain subordinated debt but including interest in respect of that certain promissory note made by CenStar Energy Corp. ("CenStar") in connection with the permitted acquisition from Verde Energy USA Holdings, LLC), letter of credit fees, commitment fees, acquisition earn-out payments (excluding earnout payments funded with proceeds from newly issued preferred or common equity), distributions, the aggregate amount of repurchases of our Class A common stock, Series A Preferred Stock, or commitments for such purchases, taxes and scheduled amortization payments. The Senior Credit Facility permits, upon satisfaction of a Step-Down Condition, for the Company to elect to reduce the minimum required Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio from 1.25 to 1.00 to 1.10 to 1.00 for a period of one year. A Step-Down Condition is defined as the consummation by the Company of share buybacks of its Series A Preferred Stock under the Repurchase Program with an aggregate purchase price not less than $10.0 million. |
| | |
| | Maximum Total Leverage Ratio. We must maintain a ratio of total indebtedness (excluding eligible subordinated debt and letter of credit obligations) to Adjusted EBITDA of no more than 2.50 to 1.00. |
| | |
| | Maximum Senior Secured Leverage Ratio. We must maintain a Senior Secured Leverage Ratio of no more than 1.85 to 1.00. The Senior Secured Leverage Ratio is defined as the ratio of (a) all indebtedness of the loan parties on a consolidated basis that is secured by a lien on any property of any loan party (including the effective amount of all loans then outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility) plus 50% of the effective amount of letter of credit obligations attributable to performance standby letters of credit to (b) Adjusted EBITDA. |
The Senior Credit Facility contains various negative covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, incur certain additional indebtedness, grant certain liens, engage in certain asset dispositions, merge or consolidate, make certain payments, distributions, investments, acquisitions or loans, materially modify certain agreements, or enter into transactions with affiliates. The Senior Credit Facility also contains affirmative covenants that are customary for credit facilities of this type. As of March 31, 2020, we were in compliance with our various covenants under the Senior Credit Facility.
27
Table of Contents
The Senior Credit Facility is secured by pledges of the equity of the portion of Spark HoldCo owned by us, the equity of Spark HoldCo's subsidiaries, the Co-Borrowers' present and future subsidiaries, and substantially all of the Co-Borrowers' and their subsidiaries' present and future property and assets, including accounts receivable, inventory and liquid investments, and control agreements relating to bank accounts.
20
Table of Contents
We are entitled to pay cash dividends to the holders of the Series A Preferred Stock and Class A common stock and will be entitled to repurchase up to an aggregate amount of 10,000,000 shares of our Class A common stock, and up to $92.7 million of Series A Preferred Stock through one or more normal course open market purchases through NASDAQ so long as: (a) no default exists or would result therefrom; (b) the Co-Borrowers are in pro forma compliance with all financial covenants before and after giving effect thereto; and (c) the outstanding amount of all loans and letters of credit does not exceed the borrowing base limits.
The Senior Credit Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties and events of default. Events of default include, among other things, payment defaults, breaches of representations and warranties, covenant defaults, cross-defaults and cross-acceleration to certain indebtedness, certain events of bankruptcy, certain events under ERISA, material judgments in excess of $5.0 million, certain events with respect to material contracts, and actual or asserted failure of any guaranty or security document supporting the Senior Credit Facility to be in full force and effect. A default will also occur if at any time W. Keith Maxwell III ceases to, directly or indirectly, own at least 13,600,000 Class A and Class B shares on a combined basis (to be adjusted for any stock split, subdivisions or other stock reclassification or recapitalization), and a controlling percentage of the voting equity interest of the Company, and certain other changes in control. If such an event of default occurs, the lenders under the Senior Credit Facility would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the facility and all actions permitted to be taken by a secured creditor.
Subordinated Debt Facility
In June 2019, the Company entered into an Amended and Restated Subordinated Promissory Note in the principal amount of up to $25.0 million (the "Subordinated Debt Facility"), by and among the Company, Spark HoldCo and Retailco. The Subordinated Debt Facility amended and restated the Subordinated Promissory Note, dated as of December 27, 2016, by and among the Company, Spark HoldCo and Retailco, solely to extend the expiration date from July 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021.
The Subordinated Debt Facility allows us to draw advances in increments of no less than $1.0 million per advance up to the maximum principal amount of the Subordinated Debt Facility. Advances thereunder accrue interest at 5% per annum from the date of the advance. We have the right to capitalize interest payments under the Subordinated Debt Facility. The Subordinated Debt Facility is subordinated in certain respects to our Senior Credit Facility pursuant to a subordination agreement. We may pay interest and prepay principal on the Subordinated Debt Facility so long as we are in compliance with the covenants under our Senior Credit Facility, are not in default under the Senior Credit Facility and have minimum availability of $5.0 million under the borrowing base under the Senior Credit Facility. Payment of principal and interest under the Subordinated Debt Facility is accelerated upon the occurrence of certain change of control or sale transactions.
As of September 30, 2019, and December 31, 2018, there was $10.5 million and $10.0 million outstanding, respectively, under the Subordinated Debt Facility.
As of March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, there was zero outstanding under the Subordinated Debt Facility.
Verde Notes
In connection with the acquisition of the Verde Companies in July 2017, we entered into a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $20.0 million (the "Verde Promissory Note"). The Verde Promissory Note required repayment in eighteen monthly installments beginning in August 2017, and accrued interest at 5% per annum from the date of issuance. The Verde Promissory Note, including principal and interest, was unsecured, but was guaranteed by us. In January 2018, in connection with the Earnout Termination Agreement (defined below), we issued to the seller of the Verde Companies an amended and restated promissory note (the "Amended and Restated
28
Table of Contents
Verde Promissory Note"), which amended and restated the Verde Promissory Note. The Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note matured in January 2019, and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Principal and interest were payable monthly on the first day of each month, with a portion of each payment going into an escrow account, which serves as security for certain indemnification claims and obligations under the Verde purchase agreement. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was zero and $1.0 million outstanding, respectively, under the Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note.
In January 2018, we issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $5.9 million in connection with an agreement to terminate the earnout obligations arising in connection with our acquisition of the Verde Companies (the "Verde Earnout Termination Note"). The Verde Earnout Termination Note matured in June 2019, and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Under the terms of the Verde Earnout Termination Note, we were permitted to withhold amounts otherwise due at maturity related to certain indemnifiable matters. A payment of $1.0 million was made to the seller of the Verde Companies in June 2019, and $4.9 million was withheld (the "Verde Holdback") to be applied to indemnifiable matters. For three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, approximately zero and $0.2 million, respectively, of the Verde Holdback was applied to costs incurred related to indemnifiable matters. As of September 30, 2019, $4.4 million of the Verde Holdback is classified as accrued liabilities, and $0.3 million is classified as other current liabilities related to indemnifiable matters. Interest was payable monthly on the first day of each month. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was zero and $5.9 million outstanding under the Verde Earnout Termination Note, respectively.
The Verde Earnout Termination Note, the Verde Promissory Note, and the Amended and Restated Verde Promissory Note are collectively referred to as the "Verde Notes."
10. Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair values are based on assumptions that market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in valuation techniques and the inputs to valuations. This includes the credit standing of counterparties involved and the impact of credit enhancements.
We apply fair value measurements to our commodity derivative instruments and contingent payment arrangements based on the following fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels:
| | |
| | Level 1-Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Instruments categorized in Level 1 primarily consist of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivative instruments. |
21
Table of Contents
| | |
| | Level 2-Inputs other than quoted prices recorded in Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, and inputs that are derived from observable market data by correlation or other means. Instruments categorized in Level 2 primarily include non-exchange traded derivatives such as over-the-counter commodity forwards and swaps and options. |
| | |
| | Level 3-Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, including situations where there is little, if any, observable market activity for the asset or liability. The Level 3 category includes estimated earnout obligations related to our acquisitions. |
As the fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable data (Level 3), the Company maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. These levels can change over time. In some cases, the inputs used to measure fair value might fall in different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In these cases, the lowest level
29
Table of Contents
input that is significant to a fair value measurement in its entirety determines the applicable level in the fair value hierarchy.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
The following tables present assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value in our condensed consolidated balance sheets on a recurring basis by and their level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
| March 31, 2020 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivative assets | $ | - | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivative assets | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total commodity derivative assets | $ | - | | | $ | 15 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 15 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivative liabilities | $ | (1,063 | ) | | $ | (5,154 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,217 | ) |- | | | $ | (28,282 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (28,282 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivative liabilities | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total commodity derivative liabilities | $ | (1,063 | ) | | $ | (5,227 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,290 | ) |
- | | | $ | (28,282 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (28,282 | ) |
| Contingent payment arrangement | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (1,328 | ) | | $ | (1,328 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | | Total |
| | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivative assets | $ | - | | | $ | 401 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 401 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivative assets | - | | | 169 | | | - | | | 169 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total commodity derivative assets | $ | - | | | $ | 570 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 570 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-trading commodity derivative liabilities | $ | (352 | ) | | $ | (5,685 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,037 | ) |(1,666 | ) | | $ | (18,772 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (20,438 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Trading commodity derivative liabilities | (75 | ) | | (472 | ) | | - | | | (547 | ) |- | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total commodity derivative liabilities | $ | (427 | ) | | $ | (6,157 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (6,584 | ) |
(1,666 | ) | | $ | (18,772 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (20,438 | ) |
| Contingent payment arrangement | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | (1,328 | ) | | $ | (1,328 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
We had no transfers of assets or liabilities between any of the above levels during the three months ended March 31, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019.
Our derivative contracts include exchange-traded contracts valued utilizing readily available quoted market prices and non-exchange-traded contracts valued using market price quotations available through brokers or over-the-counter and on-line exchanges. In addition, in determining the fair value of our derivative contracts, we apply a credit risk valuation adjustment to reflect credit risk, which is calculated based on our or the counterparty's historical credit risks. As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the credit risk valuation adjustment was less than $0.1 million.
The contingent payment arrangements referred to above reflect estimated earnout obligations incurred in relation to our acquisition of the Major Energy Companies in 2016.
Contingent Payment Arrangements
The following table presents a roll forward of our contingent payment arrangements, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the nine months ended September 30, 2019.
a reduction of derivative liabilities, net of $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
30
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | |
| | | Major Earnout and Stock Earnout |
| | | |
| Fair Value at December 31, 2018 | | $ | 1,328 | |
| | | | | |
| Change in fair value of contingent consideration, net | | - | |
| | | | |
| Accretion of contingent earnout consideration (included within interest expense) | | - | |
| | | | |
| Payments and settlements | | - | |
22
| Fair Value at September 30, 2019 | | $ | 1,328 | |
| | | | | |
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items. The carrying amounts of the Senior Credit Facility recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets approximates fair value because of the variable rate nature of interest on the borrowings thereunder, and are considered Level 2 measurements because interest rates charged are similar to other financial instruments with similar terms and maturities.
Table of Contents
11. Income Taxes
Income Taxes
We and our subsidiaries, CenStar and Verde Energy USA, Inc. ("Verde Corp"), are each subject to U.S. federal income tax as corporations. CenStar and Verde Corp file consolidated tax returns in jurisdictions that allow combined reporting. Spark HoldCo and its subsidiaries, with the exception of CenStar and Verde Corp, are treated as flow-through entities for U.S. federal income tax purposes and, as such, are generally not subject to U.S. federal income tax at the entity level. Rather, the tax liability with respect to their taxable income is passed through to their members or partners. Accordingly, we are subject to U.S. federal income taxation on our allocable share of Spark HoldCo's net U.S. taxable income.
In our financial statements, we report federal and state income taxes for our share of the partnership income attributable to our ownership in Spark HoldCo and for the income taxes attributable to CenStar and Verde Corp. Net income attributable to non-controlling interest includes the provision for income taxes related to CenStar and Verde Corp.
We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities. We apply existing tax law and the tax rate that we expect to apply to taxable income in the years in which those differences are expected to be recovered or settled in calculating the deferred tax assets and liabilities. Effects of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in income in the period of the tax rate enactment. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is not more likely than not that some or all of the benefit from the deferred tax asset will be realized.
We periodically assess whether it is more likely than not that we will generate sufficient taxable income to realize our deferred income tax assets. In making this determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence and make certain assumptions. We consider, among other things, our deferred tax liabilities, the overall business environment, our historical earnings and losses, current industry trends, and our outlook for future years. We believe it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be utilized, and accordingly have not recorded a valuation allowance on these assets.
As of March 31, 2020, we had a net deferred tax asset of $30.3 million, of which approximately $15.6 million related to the original step up in tax basis resulting from the initial purchase of Spark HoldCo units from NuDevco Retail and NuDevco Retail Holdings (predecessor to Retailco) in connection with our initial public offering.During
31
Table of Contents
the third quarter of 2019, we reversed the deferred tax asset associated with the Company's Tax Receivable Agreement ("TRA"), resulting in a net decrease to deferred tax assets of $4.2 million and a corresponding charge to additional paid in capital, in connection with the full and complete termination of the TRA. See Note 14 "Transactions with Affiliates" for further discussion of the TRA and TRA termination.
The effective U.S. federal and state income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was 16.8% and 39.5%, three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was 16.1% and 27.5%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 reflects the corporate U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21%, applied to the mix of earnings between corporate and partnership income, offset by the tax effect of Series A Preferred Stock dividends. Total income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2020 differed from amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rates to pre-tax income primarily due to state taxes and the impact of permanent differences between book and taxable income, most notably the income attributable to non-controlling interests. The effective tax rate includes a rate benefit attributable to the fact that Spark HoldCo operates as a limited liability company treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and is not subject to federal and state income taxes. Accordingly, the portion of earnings attributable to non-controlling interest is subject to tax when reported as a component of the non-controlling interest's taxable income.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
23
Table of Contents
From time to time, we may be involved in legal, tax, regulatory and other proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation or other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
Legal Proceedings
Below is a summary of our currently pending material legal proceedings. We are subject to other lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. The following legal proceedings are in various stages and are subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of material factual and legal issues. Accordingly, unless otherwise specifically noted, we cannot currently predict the manner and timing of the resolutions of these legal proceedings or estimate a range of possible losses or a minimum loss that could result from an adverse verdict in a potential lawsuit. While the lawsuits and claims are asserted for amounts that may be material should an unfavorable outcome occur, management does not currently expect that any currently pending matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Consumer Rate Lawsuits
Similar to other energy service companies ("ESCOs") operating in the industry, from time-to-time, the Company is subject to several class action lawsuits in various jurisdictions where the Company sells natural gas and electricity, such actions alleging consumers paid higher rates than they would have if they stayed with the default utility.
Janet Rolland, et al v. Spark Energy, LLC is a purported class action originally filed on April 19, 2017 in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey alleging that Spark Energy, LLC charged a variable rate that was higher than permitted by its terms of service, resulting in breach of contract and violation of the duty of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiffs alleged claims under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act. Two plaintiffs (one from New Jersey and one from Illinois) seek The case seeks to certify a putative nationwide class of all Spark variable rate electricity customers from April 19, 2011 to the present. The relief sought includes unspecified actual damages, refunds, treble damages and punitive damages for the putative class, injunctive relief, attorneys' fees and costs of suit. Spark obtained dismissal with prejudice of the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act claim and has sought dismissal of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act claim and other claims. Discovery is ongoing in this matter. In April 2020, the Judge granted a 75 day stay order to allow the parties to work on mediation. The Company will participate in mediation to see if there is a cost-efficient way to settle this matter; however, Spark denies the allegations asserted by Plaintiffs and intends to vigorously defend this matter. Given the ongoing discovery and current stage of this matter, we cannot predict the outcome of this case at this time.
Katherine Veilleux, et. al. v. Electricity Maine LLC, Provider Power, LLC, Spark HoldCo, LLC, Kevin Dean, and Emile Clavet is a purported class action lawsuit filed on November 18, 2016 in the United States District Court of Maine, alleging that Electricity Maine, LLC ("Electricity Maine"), an entity acquired by Spark Holdco in mid-2016, enrolled and re-enrolled customers through fraudulent and misleading advertising, promotions, and other communications prior to and following the acquisition. Plaintiffs allege claims under RICO, the Maine Unfair Trade Practice Act, civil conspiracy, and unjust enrichment. customers and conducted advertising, and promotions not in compliance with law. Plaintiffs seek damages for themselves and the purported
32
Table of Contents
class, injunctive relief, restitution, and attorneys' fees. Plaintiff's motion for class certification is currently pending before the court, which Spark HoldCo and Electricity Maine vigorously opposed, including by filing a motion to exclude Plaintiffs' designated expert witnesses. Electricity Maine and Spark HoldCo have also filed a motion to compel arbitration of certain Plaintiffs' claims, which is still pending before the court, on the grounds that some of the applicable Terms of Service contain an arbitration provision and class action waiver. The parties are currently in settlement negotiations. In a parallel declaratory judgment action, the Company won a favorable verdict against Zurich, one of Electricity Maine's insurance carriers, and Zurich has been ordered to pay certain costs associated with this claim that the Company believes will offset any total losses to the Company. The Company also believes indemnity offsets with the former sellers of Electricity Maine will be applicable to any settlement, but the Company may have additional liability beyond the existing indemnity and insurance coverage to resolve this matter. Given the preliminary stage of the settlement discussions, the amount of additional liability of this case remains uncertain at this time, but we do not believe that any potential additional liability will have a material adverse effect on our financial position. The parties have presented a settlement agreement for preliminary approval to the court, which we expect the court to review in second quarter of 2020.
Gillis et al. v. Respond Power, LLC is a purported class action lawsuit that was originally filed on May 21, 2014 in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas but was later removed to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. On September 15, 2014, Plaintiffs filed an amended class action complaint seeking a declaratory judgment that the disclosure statement contained in Respond Power, LLC's variable rate contracts with Pennsylvania consumers limited the variable rate that could be charged to no more than the monthly rate charged by the consumers' local utility company and alleged claims of deceptive conduct in violation of Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act, negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, and breach of contract and of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing by charging rates above the utility. The amount of damages sought is not specified. By order dated August 31, 2015, the district court denied class certification. Plaintiffs appealed the district court's denial of class certification to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and that court vacated the district court's denial of class certification and remanded the matter to the district court, for further proceedings. On July 16, 2018, the district court granted Respond Power LLC's motion to dismiss the Plaintiff's class action claims. Plaintiffs filed their notice of appeal to the Third Circuit court on August 7, 2018. The Third Circuit has declined to hear oral arguments on this matter but has not yet ruled on this appeal. The Company believes it has full indemnity coverage for any actual exposure in this case at this time.
Jurich v. Verde Energy USA, Inc. is a class action originally filed on March 3, 2015 in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut and subsequently re-filed on October 8, 2015 in the Superior Court of Judicial District of Hartford, State of Connecticut. The Amended Complaint asserts that the Verde Companies charged rates in violation of its contracts with Connecticut customers and alleges (i) violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act, Conn. Gen. Stat. §§ 42-110a et seq., and (ii) breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiffs are seeking unspecified actual and punitive damages for the class and injunctive relief. As part of an agreement in connection with the acquisition of the Verde Companies, the original owners of the Verde Companies are handling this matter. The parties have reached a class settlement in this matter, in the amount of $6.0 million, which has received preliminary court approval, which received final court approval, and an order of dismissal on February 24, 2020. Settlement claims' administration is continuing. The Company believes it has full indemnity coverage, net of tax benefit, for any actual exposure in this case at this time.
24
Table of Contents
Telemarketing Lawsuits
Similar to other ESCOs operating in the industry, from time-to-time, the Company is subject to class actions in various jurisdictions where the Company sells energy, such actions alleging consumers received calls in violation of federal and/or state telemarketing laws.
Albrecht v. Oasis Power, LLC is a putative nationwide class action that was filed on February 12, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that Oasis made illegal prerecorded telemarketing calls, including auto-dialed calls, to consumers' mobile phones, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") and the Illinois Automatic Telephone Dialers Act ("ATDA"). Plaintiff sought an injunction requiring Oasis to cease all unsolicited calling activities, an award of statutory and trebled damages under the TCPA and the ATDA, as well as costs and attorney's fees. The parties have reached a class settlement on behalf of Oasis and other affiliated brands in the amount of $7.0 million, which received final court approval on February 6, 2020. Settlement claims' administration has commenced and is continuing.
Richardson et. al. v. Verde Energy USA, Inc. is a purported class action filed on November 25, 2015 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleging that the Verde Companies violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") by placing marketing calls using an automatic telephone dialing system ("ATDS") or a prerecorded voice to the purported class members' cellular phones without prior express consent and by continuing to make such calls after receiving requests for the calls to cease. Following discovery and dispositive motions, the Verde Companies received a favorable ruling on summary judgment with the court agreeing with the Verde Companies that the call system used in this case was not an ATDS as defined by the TCPA. Plaintiffs subsequently amended their petition eliminating their ATDS claim and including a class based on failure to comply with the National Do Not Call registry. As part of an agreement in connection with the acquisition of the Verde Companies, the original owners of the Verde Companies are handling this matter. The parties reached a confidential settlement in this matter. A hearing On Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary settlement approval was held on September 23, 2019, at which the court denied preliminary approval. Negotiations with the Plaintiffs continue insettlement in this matter. On January 17, 2020, the court approved the Parties' preliminary settlement and settlement claims' administration has commenced. Final court approval is scheduled for May 27, 2020.
33
Table of Contents
an effort to modify the settlement to meet the Court's concerns. The Plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due to be filed on or before December 23, 2019. The Company believes it has full indemnity coverage, net of tax benefit, for the settlement exposure in this case.
Corporate Matter Lawsuits
Saul Horowitz, as Sellers' Representative for the former owners of the Major Energy Companies v. National Gas & Electric, LLC ("NG&E") and Spark Energy, Inc., is a lawsuit filed on October 17, 2017 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York asserting claims of fraudulent inducement against NG&E, breach of contract against NG&E and Spark, and tortious interference with contract against Spark related to a membership interest purchase agreement, subsequent dropdown, and associated earnout agreements with the Major Energy Companies' former owners. The relief sought includes unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, prejudgment and post-judgment interest, and attorneys' fees. On September 24, 2018, the court granted Defendants' motion to dismiss in part and dismissed Plaintiffs' fraudulent inducement claims. NG&E and Spark filed their affirmative defenses and answer to the remaining claims on October 15, 2018. On January 14, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, which was subsequently denied by the Court on May 8, 2019. On March 25, 2019, Spark and NG&E filed a Motion for Sanctions in connection with deletion of electronically stored data by plaintiff Saul Horowitz and co-seller Mark Wiederman after receiving a litigation hold notice, which the Court granted in part on May 8, 2019, including an award of attorneys' fees and costs to Spark and NG&E in connection with the Motion for Sanctions. On June 7, 2019, the parties jointly filed a letter agreement with the Court confirming plaintiff's payment of fees and costs, including costs associated with forensic analysis, in the amount of less than $0.1 million to Spark and NG&E in connection with the Court's ruling on their Motion for Sanctions. This case is currently scheduled for mediation on November 7, 2019, set for a final pre-trial conference on January 28, 2020 and for trial to commence on March 2, 2020. This case went to trial during the first two weeks of March 2020 and all material has been submitted to the Judge for his decision. Given the trial was in Manhattan, New York, which has been under a shelter-in-place order, we are not able to predict when we receive a final decision on this matter. Spark and NG&E deny the allegations asserted by Plaintiffs and intend to vigorously defend this matter; Given the ongoing expert discovery and current stage of this matter, have vigorously defended this matter; however, we cannot predict the outcome or consequences of this case at this time.
Albrecht v. Oasis Power, LLC is a putative nationwide class action that was filed on February 12, 2018 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that Oasis made illegal prerecorded telemarketing calls, including auto-dialed calls, to consumers' mobile phones, in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act ("TCPA") and the Illinois Automatic Telephone Dialers Act ("ATDA"). Plaintiff sought an injunction requiring Oasis to cease all unsolicited calling activities, an award of statutory and trebled damages under the TCPA and the ATDA, as well as costs and attorney's fees. The parties have reached a class settlement on behalf of Oasis and other affiliated brands in the amount of $7.0 million, which has received preliminary court approval. The Company has sought indemnity and insurance coverage from two vendors and their carriers that worked on the telemarketing campaigns at issue.
Regulatory Matters
Many state regulators have increased scrutiny on retail energy providers, across all industry providers. We are subject to regular regulatory inquiries and preliminary investigations in the ordinary course of our business. Below is a summary of our currently pending material state regulatory matters. The following state regulatory matters are in various stages and are subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of material factual and legal issues. Accordingly, we cannot currently predict the manner and timing of the resolution of these state regulatory matters or estimate a range of possible losses or a minimum loss that could result from an adverse action.
regulatory matters.
state of Illinois v. Major Energy Electric Services, LLC is a complaint filed by the Illinois Attorney General for injunctive and other relief against Major Energy Electric Services, LLC ("Major") asserting claims that Major engaged in a pattern and practice of deceptive conduct intended to defraud Illinois consumers through door-to-door and telephone solicitations, in-person solicitations at retail establishments, advertisements on its website and direct mail advertisements to sign up for electricity services. The complaint seeks injunctive relief and monetary damages representing the amounts Illinois consumers have allegedly lost due to fraudulent marketing activities. The Attorney General also requests civil penalties under the Consumer Fraud Act and to revoke Major's authority to operate in the state. The complaint was filed on April 9, 2018 in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department, Chancery Division. Major filed its motion to dismiss on July 31, 2018 and the judge denied that motion on October 10, 2018. Major filed a motion for reconsideration on the Court's ruling on its motion to dismiss, which was denied. The parties resolved the case on August 16, 2019. the court entered a final judgment and consent decree, which included Major paying $2.0 million in refunds to consumers, and $0.1 million as a voluntary contribution to the Illinois Attorney General's Office. The settlement also included a number of injunctive and reporting provisions with which Major must comply. Major will make the refund payments beginning in approximately December 2019.
25
Table of Contents
PURA Investigations. Spark Energy, LLC ("SE LLC") is the subject of two current investigations by
Management does not currently expect that any currently pending state regulatory matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.
Connecticut. Spark Energy, LLC ("SE LLC") has been working with the Connecticut Public Utilities Regulatory Authority ("PURA") The first investigation constitutes a notice of violation ("NOV") and assessment of a proposed civil penalty in the amount of $0.9 million primarily for SE LLC's alleged failure to comply regarding compliance with requirements implemented in 2016 that customer bills include any changes to existing rates effective for the next billing cycle. After a hearing process was concluded and SE LLC filed a brief challenging the legal authority of PURA to enforce the NOV and impose civil penalties for the alleged violations, PURA suspended the proceeding and opened SE LLC and other ESCOs in Connecticut have agreed to submit to a proceeding offering amnesty to ESCOs that self-report violations and offer to voluntarily remit refunds to customers. Spark has remitted its report of potential customers who would be eligible for refunds under the amnesty program and submitted its confidential settlement proposal along with SE LLC's commitment, subject to certain conditions. SE LLC is awaiting PURA's completion of a review and audit process after which SE LLC expects PURA to issue a final decision on SE LLC's offer of amnesty The second investigation involves an NOV alleging improper marketing practices of one of SE LLC's former outbound telemarketing vendors and assessment of a proposed civil penalty of $0.8 million. Certain agents managed by this vendor were allegedly using an unauthorized script in outbound marketing calls. On July 17, 2019, PURA issued a final decision, which upheld the proposed civil penalty amount of $0.8 million. The final decision also refers the matter to the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection and the Connecticut Office of the Attorney General for possible further investigation, the outcome of which we are unable to predict. on August 30, 2019, SE LLC filed an administrative appeal of The final decision to the Connecticut Superior Court and the action remains pending.PURA has completed its review and audit and issued a final decision on March 31, 2020 regarding SE LLC's amnesty payment, which SE LLC will comply with and pay in May 2020.
Illinois, Spark Energy, LLC received a verbal inquiry from the Illinois Commerce Commission ("ICC") and the Illinois Attorney General ("IAG") on January 1, 2020 seeking to understand an increase in complaints from Illinois consumers. The Company met with the ICC and the IAG in February 2020 and plan to discuss a compliance plan to ensure its sales are in compliance with Illinois regulations. The parties also discussed possible restitution payments to any customers impacted by sales not in compliance with Illinois regulations. The Company is currently working with both regulators on this matter.
PUCO Investigation. Verde Energy USA Ohio, LLC ("Verde Ohio") is the subject of a formal investigation by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ("PUCO") initiated on April 16, 2019. The investigation asserts that Verde Ohio engaged in misleading and deceptive practices to market and enroll customers as well as allegations of violating several requirements of Ohio's retail energy supplier regulations. On May 3, 2019, Verde Ohio filed a Motion to Temporarily Suspend the Procedural Schedule and Stay Discovery Pending Negotiation of a Stipulation between the parties. In its Motion, Verde Ohio agreed to a thirty (30) day voluntary marketing and customer enrollment stay in Ohio. Although The Motion was not granted by PUCO, Verde Ohio has continued its voluntary marketing and customer enrollment stay in Ohio in furtherance of settlement negotiations with PUCO Staff. Also on May 3, 2019, PUCO Staff issued a report of its findings following their investigation of Verde Ohio, and filed a corrected version on May 29, 2019, as contemplated in PUCO's procedural schedule set forth in The April 17th, 2019 PUCO entry in the matter. On August 5, 2019, PUCO suspended the procedural schedule in the investigation in light of settlement negotiations between Verde Ohio and PUCO Staff. On September 6, 2019, Verde Ohio and PUCO Staff executed and filed with PUCO a Joint Stipulation and Recommendation for PUCO's review and approval which sets forth agreed settlement terms. If approved by PUCO, the Joint Stipulation and Recommendation would resolve all of the issues raised in the investigation. While investigations of this nature may be resolved in a manner that allows the retail energy supplier to continue operating in Ohio with stipulations, there can be no assurances that PUCO will not take more severe action.
Maine. PUC Investigation. In early 2018, Staff of the Maine Public Utilities Commission ("Maine PUC") issued letters to Electricity Maine seeking information about customer complaints principally associated with door-to-door ("D2D") sales practices. In late July 2018, the Maine PUC issued an Order to Show Cause to which Electricity Maine filed a detailed response in mid-August 2018. After a lengthy period of inactivity,and Electricity Maine responded in mid-August 2018. The Commission scheduled a procedural conference in early 2019 that resulted in no intervenors other than participation as a party by the Maine Office of Public Advocate. At the conference, the parties agreed on a procedural schedule, including a one-day evidentiary hearing. Following post-hearing discovery, Initial and Reply Briefs were filed on August 30, 2019 and September 10, 2019, respectively. The parties are awaiting a proposed ruling from the Maine PUC hearing examiner after which point The parties can either accept the ruling or take exception and argue the merits before the Maine PUC.Commissioners. Maine PUC hearing examiner released its report in April 2020 alleging failures of compliance related to enrollment and marketing practices by Electricity Maine. The Company agreed that the best resolution to this matter was a $1.0 million settlement, to be paid over a two-year period, which will provide consumer relief and assistance for those who have energy needs related to the COVID-19 pandemic. This settlement is pending approval by the PUC.
New York. Prior to the purchase of Major Energy by the Company, in 2015, Major Energy Services, LLC and Major Energy Electric Services were contacted by the Attorney General, Bureau of Consumer Frauds & Protection for State of New York relating to their marketing practices. Major Energy has exchanged information in response to various requests from the Attorney General. The parties are in settlement negotiations at this time. While investigations of this nature may be resolved in a manner that allows the retail energy supplier to continue operating in New York with stipulations, there can be no assurances that the New York Attorney General will not take more severe action.
Ohio. Verde Energy USA Ohio, LLC ("Verde Ohio") was the subject of a formal investigation by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio ("PUCO") initiated on April 16, 2019. The investigation asserted that Verde Ohio may have violated Ohio's retail energy supplier regulations. Verde Ohio voluntary suspended door-to-door marketing in Ohio in furtherance of settlement negotiations with the PUCO Staff. On September 6, 2019, Verde Ohio and PUCO Staff executed and filed with PUCO a Joint Stipulation and Recommendation for PUCO's review and approval, which sets forth agreed settlement terms, which includes a $1.7 million in refunds to customers and a penalty of $0.7 million. The settlement approved by PUCO on February 26, 2020, and the Joint Stipulation and Recommendation resolves all of the issues raised in the investigation. The parties are working together to agree on the process of providing refunds to customers. The Ohio Officer of Consumer Counsel has contested this settlement, and has initiated discovery requests to Verde Ohio as well as contesting Verde Ohio's license renewal.
In addition, in September of 2019, the Ohio Attorney General ("OAG") alleged that Verde Ohio had violated its Consumer Sales Practice Act and Do Not Call regulations. Verde Ohio is cooperating and responding to the OAG's document requests; however, at this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
26
Table of Contents
Pennsylvania. Verde Energy USA, Inc. ("Verde") is the subject of a formal investigation by the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Bureau of Investigation and Enforcement ("PPUC") initiated on January 30, 2020. The investigation asserts that Verde may have violated Pennsylvania retail energy supplier regulations. The Company met with the PPUC in February 2020 to discuss the matter and work with the PPUC cooperatively. The Company has provided a settlement term sheet to the PPUC and the parties are working cooperatively together on a resolution and settlement; however, currently, the Company cannot predict the outcome at this time.
Indirect Tax Audits
We are undergoing various types of indirect tax audits spanning from years 2013 to 2019 for which we may have additional liabilities arise. At the time of filing these condensed consolidated financial statements, these indirect tax audits are at an early stage and subject to substantial uncertainties concerning the outcome of audit findings and corresponding responses.
As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had accrued $23.8 million and $29.2 million, respectively, related to litigation and regulatory matters and $2.1 million and $1.8 million, respectively, related to indirect tax audits. The outcome of each of these may result in additional expense.
13. Transactions with Affiliates
Transactions with Affiliates
We enter into transactions with and pay certain costs on behalf of affiliates that are commonly controlled in order to reduce risk, reduce administrative expense, create economies of scale, create strategic alliances and supply goods and services to these related parties. We also sell and purchase natural gas and electricity with affiliates. We present receivables and payables with the same affiliate on a net basis in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as all affiliate activity is with parties under common control. Affiliated transactions include certain services to the affiliated companies associated with employee benefits provided through our benefit plans, insurance plans, leased office space, administrative salaries, due diligence work, recurring management consulting, and accounting, tax, legal, or technology services. Amounts billed are based on the services provided, departmental usage, or headcount, which are considered reasonable by management. As such, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include costs that have been incurred by us and then directly billed or allocated to affiliates, as well as costs that have been incurred by our affiliates and then directly billed or allocated to us, and are recorded net in general and administrative expense on the condensed consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding accounts receivable-affiliates or accounts payable-affiliates, respectively, recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Transactions with affiliates for sales or purchases of natural gas and electricity are recorded in retail revenues, retail cost of revenues, and net asset optimization revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding accounts receivable-affiliate or accounts payable-affiliate are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Master Service Agreement with Retailco Services, LLC
Prior to April 1, 2018, we were a party to a Master Service Agreement with an affiliated company owned by our Founder. The Master Service Agreement provided us with operational support services such as enrollment and renewal transaction services, customer billing and transaction services, electronic payment processing services, customer service, and information technology infrastructure and application support services. Effective April 1, 2018, we terminated the agreement, and these operational support services were transferred back to us.
Cost Allocations
Where costs incurred on behalf of the affiliate or us cannot be determined by specific identification for direct billing, the costs are allocated to the affiliated entities or us based on estimates of percentage of departmental usage, wages or headcount. The total net amount direct billed and allocated (to)/from affiliates was $(0.5) million and $0.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The total net amount direct billed and allocated (to)/from affiliates was $(0.1) million and $8.7 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.$(0.2) million and
Of the amounts directly billed and allocated from affiliates, we recorded general and administrative expense of zero and less than $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and we recorded general and administrative expense of zero and $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. Additionally, we capitalized zero of property and equipment for the application, development and implementation of various systems during the three months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, and we capitalized zero and $0.5 million of property and equipmentMarch 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
36
Table of Contents
for the application, development and implementation of various systems during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Payable-Affiliates
As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had current accounts receivable-affiliates of $2.9 million and $2.0 million, respectively, and current accounts payable-affiliates of $0.9 million and $1.0 million, respectively.
Revenues and Cost of Revenues-Affiliates
27
Table of Contents
Revenues recorded in net asset optimization revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 related to affiliated sales were $0.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively. Revenues recorded in net asset optimization revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 March 31, 2020 and 2019 related to affiliated sales were $0.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
Cost of revenues recorded in net asset optimization revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 related to affiliated purchases were less than $0.1 million Cost of revenues recorded in net asset optimization revenues in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 related to affiliated purchases were $0.1 million,$0.2 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively. These amounts are presented as net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Acquisitions from Related Parties
In March 2018, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with an affiliate to acquire up to 50,000 RCEs for a cash purchase price of $250 for each RCE, or up to $12.5 million in the aggregate. A total of $8.8 million was paid in 2018 under the terms of the purchase agreement for approximately 35,000 RCEs, and no further material payments are anticipated. The acquisition was treated as a transfer of assets between entities under common control, and accordingly, the assets were recorded at their historical value at the date of transfer. The transaction resulted in less than $0.1 million and $7.1 million recorded in equity as a net distribution to affiliate as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
Distributions to and Contributions from Affiliates
During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, we During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, Spark HoldCo made distributions to affiliates of our Founder of $3.8 million and $3.8 million, respectively, for payments of quarterly distributions on their respective Spark HoldCo units. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, we three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, Spark HoldCo also made distributions to these affiliates for gross-up distributions of $3.4 million and zero, respectively, in connection with distributions made between Spark HoldCo and Spark Energy, Inc. for payment of income taxes incurred by us.and settlement of the TRA.
Proceeds from Disgorgement of Stockholder Short-swing Profits
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, we received zero and During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, we received zero and less than $0.1 million, respectively, cash for the disgorgement of stockholder short-swing profits under Section 16(b) under the Exchange Act. The amount was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital in our consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2019
received in 2019
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, the Company received zero and $0.2 million, respectively, cash for the disgorgement of stockholder short-swing profits under Section 16(b) under the Exchange Act accrued at December 31, 2017. The amount was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital in our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2019.
37
Table of Contents
Subordinated Debt Facility
In June 2019, we and Spark HoldCo entered into a Subordinated Debt Facility with an affiliate owned by our Founder, which allows the Company to borrow up to $25.0 million. The Subordinated Debt Facility allows us to draw advances in increments of no less than $1.0 million per advance up to the maximum principal amount of the Subordinated Debt Facility. Advances thereunder accrue interest at 5% per annum from the date of the advance. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was $10.5 million and $10.0 million in outstanding borrowings respectively,March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, there was zero in outstanding borrowings under the Subordinated Debt Facility. See Note 9 "Debt" for a further description of terms and conditions of the Subordinated Debt Facility.
Tax Receivable Agreement
Prior to July 11, 2019, we were party to a TRA with affiliates. Effective July 11, 2019, the Company entered into a TRA Termination and Release Agreement (the "Release Agreement"), which provided for a full and complete termination of any further payment, reimbursement or performance obligation of the Company, Retailco and NuDevco Retail under the TRA, whether past, accrued or yet to arise. Pursuant to the Release Agreement, the Company made a cash payment of approximately $11.2 million on July 15, 2019 to Retailco and NuDevco Retail. In connection with the termination of the TRA, Spark HoldCo made a distribution of approximately $16.3 million on July 15, 2019 to Retailco and NuDevco Retail under the Spark HoldCo Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, as amended.The total amount of the distribution made to Retailco and NuDevco Retail in connection with the TRA settlement was subsequently loaned back to Spark HoldCo under the Subordinated Debt Facility on July 16, 2019.
The TRA generally provided for the payment by us to affiliates of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we realized or would realize (or were deemed to realize in certain circumstances) in future periods as a result of (i) any tax basis increases resulting from the initial purchase by us of Spark HoldCo units from entities owned by our Founder, (ii) any tax basis increases resulting from the exchange of Spark HoldCo units for shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the Exchange Right (or resulting from an exchange of Spark HoldCo units for cash pursuant to the Cash Option) and (iii) any imputed interest deemed to be paid by us as a result of, and additional tax basis arising from, any payments we made under the TRA. We retained the benefit of the remaining 15% of these tax savings. See Note 12 "Income Taxes" for further discussion.
In certain circumstances, we could defer or partially defer any payment due (a "TRA Payment") to the holders of rights under the TRA for a five year period that would end September 30, 2019. Deferral of payment was required to the extent that Spark HoldCo did not generate sufficient Cash Available for Distribution (as defined below) during the four-quarter period ending September 30th of the applicable year in which the TRA Payment was to be made in an amount that equaled or exceeded 130% (the "TRA Coverage Ratio") of the Total Distributions (as defined below) paid in such four-quarter period by Spark HoldCo. For purposes of computing the TRA Coverage Ratio:
| | |
| | "Cash Available for Distribution" was generally defined as the Adjusted EBITDA of Spark HoldCo for the applicable period, less (i) cash interest paid by Spark HoldCo, (ii) capital expenditures of Spark HoldCo (exclusive of customer acquisition costs) and (iii) any taxes payable by Spark HoldCo; and |
| | |
| | "Total Distributions" were defined as the aggregate distributions necessary to cause us to receive distributions of cash equal to (i) the targeted quarterly distribution we intended to pay to holders of our Class A common stock and Series A Preferred Stock payable during the applicable four-quarter period, plus (ii) the estimated taxes payable by us during such four-quarter period, plus (iii) the expected TRA Payment payable during the calendar year for which the TRA Coverage Ratio is being tested. |
At the end of the deferral period, we were obligated to pay any outstanding deferred TRA Payments to the extent such deferred TRA Payments did not exceed (i) the lesser of our proportionate share of aggregate Cash Available for Distribution of Spark HoldCo during the five-year deferral period or the cash distributions actually received by
38
Table of Contents
us during the five-year deferral period, reduced by (ii) the sum of (a) the aggregate target quarterly dividends (which, for the purposes of the TRA, was $0.18125 per Class A common stock share and $0.546875 per Series A Preferred Stock share per quarter) during the five-year deferral period, (b) our estimated taxes during the five-year deferral period (c) all prior TRA Payments and (d) if with respect to the quarterly period during which the deferred TRA Payment is otherwise paid or payable, Spark HoldCo had or reasonably determined it would have amounts necessary to cause us to receive distributions of cash equal to the target quarterly distribution payable during that quarterly period. Any portion of the deferred TRA Payments not payable due to these limitations would no longer be payable.
For the four-quarter periods ending September 30, 2016, 2017, and 2018, we met the threshold coverage ratio required to fund the payments required under the TRA. Our affiliates, however, granted us the right to defer the TRA Payment related to the four-quarter period ending September 30, 2016 until May 2018. In April, May, and December of 2018, we paid a total of $6.2 million related to our obligations under the TRA for the 2015, 2016, and 2017 tax years.
As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had a total liability related to the TRA of zero and $27.6 million, of which zero and $1.7 million was classified as current liabilities at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
14. Segment Reporting
Our determination of reportable business segments considers the strategic operating units under which we make financial decisions, allocate resources and assess performance of our business. Our reportable business segments are retail electricity and retail natural gas. The retail electricity segment consists of electricity sales and transmission to residential and commercial customers. The retail natural gas segment consists of natural gas sales to, and natural gas transportation and distribution for, residential and commercial customers. Corporate and other consists of expenses and assets of the retail electricity and natural gas segments that are managed at a consolidated level such as general and administrative expenses. Asset optimization activities are also included in Corporate and other.
28
Table of Contents
For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019,For the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, we recorded asset optimization revenues of $14.6 million and $28.3 million and asset optimization cost of revenues of $14.9 million and $28.0 million, respectively, which are presented on a net basis in asset optimization (expense) revenues. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, we recorded asset optimization revenues of $6.4 million and $23.4 million and asset optimization cost of revenues of $6.1 million and $20.8 million, respectively, which are presented on a net basis in asset optimization revenues.
The acquisitions of HIKO in 2018 had no impact on our reportable business segments as the portions of those acquisitions related to retail natural gas and retail electricity have been included in those existing business segments.
We use retail gross margin to assess the performance of our operating segments. Retail gross margin is defined as operating (loss) income plus (i) depreciation and amortization expenses and (ii) general and administrative expenses, less (i) net asset optimization (expenses) revenues, (ii) net (losses) gains on non-trading derivative instruments, and (iii) net current period cash settlements on non-trading derivative instruments. We deduct net (losses) gains on non-trading derivative instruments, excluding current period cash settlements, from the retail gross margin calculation in order to remove the non-cash impact of net gains and losses on these derivative instruments. Retail gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, operating income, as determined in accordance with GAAP.
Below is a reconciliation of retail gross margin to income before income tax expense (in thousands):
39
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Reconciliation of Retail Gross Margin to Income before taxes | | | |
| | | | | || | |
| Income before income tax expense | $ | 44,243 | | | $ | 22,645 | | | $ | 17,959 | | | $ | 1,525 | |11,993 | | | $ | 3,786 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Interest and other income | (322 | ) | | 47 | | | (1,005 | ) | | (707 | ) |
| Interest and other income | (160 | ) | | (189 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 2,174 | | | 2,762 | | | 6,392 | | | 7,323 | |
| Interest expense | 1,553 | | | 2,223 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating income | 46,095 | | | 25,454 | | | 23,346 | | | 8,141 | |
| Operating income | 13,386 | | | 5,820 | |
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,496 | | | 13,917 | | | 31,963 | | | 39,797 | |8,796 | | | 12,155 | |
| | | | | | |
| General and administrative | 27,629 | | | 25,695 | | | 94,352 | | | 83,522 | |
| General and administrative | 25,676 | | | 29,476 | |
| | | | | | |
| Less: | | | |
| | | | | || | |
| Net asset optimization (expense) revenues | (254 | ) | | 348 | | | 2,242 | | | 3,798 | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | 321 | | | 2,552 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net, loss on non-trading derivative instruments | 12,528 | | | 17,888 | | | (42,741 | ) | | (2,223 | ) |(24,533 | ) | | (19,803 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | || |
| Net, Cash settlements on non-trading derivative instruments | 12,764 | | | 1,035 | | |33,677 | | | (5,054 | ) |16,609 | | | 8,125 | |
| | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 58,182 | | | $ | 45,795 | | | $ | 156,483 | | | $ | 134,939 | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 55,461 | | | $ | 56,577 | |
| | | | | | | | || | | | | | | |
29
Table of Contents
Financial data for business segments are as follows (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 |
| | Retail | | Retail | | Corporate | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| | Electricity | | Natural Gas | | and Other | | | | |
| Total Revenues | $ | 197,010 | | | $ | 10,331 | | | $ | (254 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | 207,087 | |
| Total Revenues | $ | 121,768 | | | $ | 44,592 | | | $ | 321 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 166,681 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 119,100 | | | 4,767 | | | - | | | - | | | 123,867 | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 100,383 | | | 18,440 | | | - | | | - | | | 118,823 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization expenses | - | | | - | | | 321 | | | - | | | 321 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net, loss on non-trading derivative instruments | 12,652 | | | (124 | ) | | - | | | - | | | 12,528 | |(24,386 | ) | | (147 | ) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives | 12,115 | | | 649 | | | - | | | - | | | 12,764 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 53,143 | | | $ | 5,039 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 58,182 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Assets at September 30, 2019 | $ | 2,370,994 | | | $ | 764,432 | | | $ | 348,401 | | | $ | (3,085,425 | ) | | $ | 398,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill at September 30, 2019 | $ | 117,813 | | | $ | 2,530 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 120,343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended September 30, 2018 |
| | Retail | | Retail | | Corporate | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| | Electricity | | Natural Gas | | and Other | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 246,182 | | | $ | 11,945 | | | $ | 348 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 258,475 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 186,449 | | | 6,960 | | | - | | | - | | | 193,409 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | - | | | - | | | 348 | | | - | | | 348 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net, gain (loss) on non-trading derivative instruments | 18,415 | | | (527 | ) || - | | | - | | | 17,888 | |
(24,533 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives | 1,066 | | | (31 | ) | | - | | | - | | | 1,035 | |14,965 | | | 1,644 | | | - | | | - | | | 16,609 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 30,806 | | | $ | 24,655 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 55,461 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Assets at December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,857,790 | | | $ | 649,969 | | | $ | 361,697 | | | $ | (2,380,718 | ) | | $ | 488,738 | |
| Total Assets at March 31, 2020 | $ | 2,622,259 | | | $ | 862,873 | | | $ | 336,218 | | | $ | (3,431,718 | ) | | $ | 389,632 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill at December 31, 2018 | $ | 117,813 | | | $ | 2,530 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 120,343 | |
| Goodwill at March 31, 2020
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
41
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 |
| | Retail | | Retail | | Corporate | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| | Electricity | | Natural Gas | | and Other | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 539,878 | | | $ | 85,422 | | | $ | 2,242 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 627,542 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 433,175 | | | 44,706 | | | - | | | - | | | 477,881 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | - | | | - | | | 2,242 | | | - | | | 2,242 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net, (loss) gain on non-trading derivatives | (42,984 | ) | | 243 | | | - | | | - | | | (42,741 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives | 32,957 | | | 720 | | | - | | | - | | | 33,677 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 116,730 | | | $ | 39,753 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 156,483 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Assets at September 30, 2019 | $ | 2,370,994 | | | $ | 764,432 | | | $ | 348,401 | | | $ | (3,085,425 | ) | | $ | 398,402 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill at September 30, 2019 | $ | 117,813 | | | $ | 2,530 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 120,343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Three Months Ended March 31, 2019 |
| | Retail | | Retail | | Corporate | | Eliminations | | Consolidated |
| | Electricity | | Natural Gas | | and Other | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 676,528 | | | $ | 97,088 | | | $ | 3,798 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 777,414 | |
| Total revenues | $ | 182,092 | | | $ | 58,062 | | | $ | 2,552 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 242,706 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 587,949 | | | 58,005 | | | - | | | - | | | 645,954 | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 165,888 | | | 29,367 | | | - | | | - | | | 195,255 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Less: | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | - | | | - | | | 2,552 | | | - | | | 2,552 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net, gain (loss) on non-trading derivatives | 1,216 | | | (3,439 | ) | | - | | | - | | | (2,223 | ) |
| Net, (loss) gain on non-trading derivative instruments | (21,942 | ) | | 2,139 | | | - | | | - | | | (19,803 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current period settlements on non-trading derivatives | (5,250 | ) | | 196 | | | - | | | - | | | (5,054 | ) |8,173 | | | (48 | ) | | - | | | - | | | 8,125 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 29,973 | | | $ | 26,604 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 56,577 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Assets at December 31, 2018 | $ | 1,857,790 | | | $ | 649,969 | | | $ | 361,697 | | | $ | (2,380,718 | ) | | $ | 488,738 | |
| Total Assets at December 31, 2019 | $ | 2,524,884 | | | $ | 820,601 | | | $ | 341,411 | | | $ | (3,263,928 | ) | | $ | 422,968 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Goodwill at December 31, 2019 | $ | 117,813 | | | $ | 2,530 | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 120,343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
30
Table of Contents
15. Subsequent Events
Declaration of Dividends
On April 21, 2020, we declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18125 per share to holders of record of our Class A common stock on December 2, 2019, which will be paid on December 16, 2019.June 1, 2020, which will be paid on June 15, 2020.
On April 21, 2020, we also declared a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.546875 per share to holders of record of the Series A Preferred Stock on January 1, 2020. of our Series A Preferred Stock.July 1, 2020. The dividend will be paid on July 15, 2020.
31
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our 2019 Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on March 5, 2020. Results of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results to be attained for any other period. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" and "Risk Factors."
Overview
We are an independent retail energy services company founded in 1999 that provides residential and commercial customers in competitive markets across the United States with an alternative choice for their natural gas and electricity. We purchase our natural gas and electricity supply from a variety of wholesale providers and bill our customers monthly for the delivery of natural gas and electricity based on their consumption at either a fixed or variable price. Natural gas and electricity are then distributed to our customers by local regulated utility companies through their existing infrastructure. As of March 31, 2020, we operated in 94 utility service territories across 19 states and the District of Columbia.
Our business consists of two operating segments:
| | |
| | Retail Electricity Segment. In this segment, we purchase electricity supply through physical and financial transactions with market counterparties and ISOs and supply electricity to residential and commercial consumers pursuant to fixed-price and variable-price contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, approximately 95% and 95%, March 31, 2020 and 2019, approximately 73% and 76%, respectively, of our retail revenues were derived from the sale of electricity. |
| | |
| | Retail Natural Gas Segment. In this segment, we purchase natural gas supply through physical and financial transactions with market counterparties and supply natural gas to residential and commercial consumers pursuant to fixed-price and variable-price contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, approximately 5% and 5%, March 31, 2020 and 2019, approximately 27% and 24%, respectively, of our retail revenues were derived from the sale of natural gas. |
Recent Developments
Appointment of Interim Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer
Effective July 11, 2019, the Company entered into a TRA Termination and Release Agreement (the "Release Agreement"), which provided for a full and complete termination of any further payment, reimbursement or performance obligation of the Company and Retailco and NuDevco Retail under the Tax Receivable Agreement"), ("TRA"), whether past, accrued or yet to arise. Pursuant to the Release Agreement, the Company made a cash payment of approximately $11.2 million to Retailco and NuDevco Retail. in connection with the termination of the TRA, Spark HoldCo made a distribution of approximately $16.3 million to Retailco and NuDevco Retail that was subsequently loaned back to Spark HoldCo, under the Subordinated Debt Facility.
Effective March 12, 2020, our Board of Directors appointed W. Keith Maxwell III as interim Chief Executive Officer and appointed Kevin McMinn as Chief Operating Officer.
Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement
On March 30, 2020, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Spark HoldCo, LLC (the "Amendment"). The Amendment amends the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Spark Holdco, LLC, dated as of March 15, 2017, as amended (the "Third Restated LLC Agreement"), to revise the definition of Assumed Tax Liability and Special Assumed Tax Liability, which terms are used in the Third Restated LLC Agreement to determine the amount of cash that is distributed to members of Spark HoldCo, including the Company.
COVID-19
32
Table of Contents
On August 27, 2019, The Board of Directors appointed Amanda E. Bush to serve as a Class III independent director. Ms. Bush has been appointed to the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and she will serve as the Chair of the Audit Committee. the Audit Committee now consists of Ms. Bush, Kenneth M. Hartwick, and Nick W. Evans, Jr.
The recent outbreak of the novel Coronavirus ("COVID-19") is a rapidly developing situation around the globe that has adversely impacted economic activity and conditions worldwide. Some industries have been impacted more severely than others.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company deployed a remote working strategy that enables certain employees to work from home, provided timely communication to team members and customers, implemented protocols for team members' safety, and initiated strategies for monitoring and responding to local COVID-19 impacts. The Company's preparedness efforts, coupled with quick and decisive plan implementation, resulted in minimal impacts to operations. Although the Company ceased door-to-door sales activities and is closely monitoring bad debt as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, for the first quarter of 2020, the Company had no material impact to its business, financial condition or results of operations.
44
We are continuing to monitor developments involving our workforce, customers and suppliers and cannot predict at this time whether COVID-19 will have a material impact on our operations, business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations going forward. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
Residential Customer Equivalents
We measure our number of customers using residential customer equivalents ("RCEs"). The following table shows our RCEs by segment during the three months ended March 31, 2020:
| |
| | | | | | |
| RCEs: | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | June 30, 2019 | Additions | Attrition | September 30, 2019 | % Increase (Decrease) |
| Retail Electricity | 673 | 41 | (80) | 634 | (6)% |
| Retail Natural Gas | 145 | 9 | (16) | 138 | (5)% |
| | | | | | |
| Total Retail | 818 | 50 | (96) | 772 | (6)% |
| | | | | | |
| |
| | | | | | |
| RCEs: | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | December 31, 2019 | Additions | Attrition | March 31, 2020 | % Increase (Decrease) |
| Retail Electricity | 754 | 157 | (277) | 634 | (16)% |
| Retail Electricity | 533 | 16 | (89) | 460 | (14)% |
| Retail Natural Gas | 154 | 43 | (59) | 138 | (10)% |
| Retail Natural Gas | 139 | 5 | (19) | 125 | (10)% |
| Total Retail | 908 | 200 | (336) | 772 | (15)% |
| Total Retail | 672 | 21 | (108) | 585 | (13)% |
The following table details our count of RCEs by geographical location as of March 31, 2020:
| |
| | | | | | | |
| RCEs by Geographic Location: | | | | | | |
| (In thousands) | Electricity | % of Total | Natural Gas | % of Total | Total | % of Total |
| New England | 286 | 45% | 28 | 20% | 314 | 41% |
| New England | 183 | 40% | 25 | 20% | 208 | 35% |
| Mid-Atlantic | 224 | 35% | 47 | 34% | 271 | 35% |
| Mid-Atlantic | 166 | 36% | 44 | 35% | 210 | 36% |
| Midwest | 60 | 10% | 43 | 31% | 103 | 13% |
| Midwest | 50 | 11% | 36 | 29% | 86 | 15% |
| Southwest | 64 | 10% | 20 | 15% | 84 | 11% |
| Southwest | 61 | 13% | 20 | 16% | 81 | 14% |
| Total | 460 | 100% | 125 | 100% | 585 | 100% |
The geographical locations noted above include the following states:
| | |
| | New England - Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire; |
| | |
| | Mid-Atlantic - Delaware, Maryland (including the District of Columbia), New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania; |
| | |
| | Midwest - Illinois, Indiana, Michigan and Ohio; and |
| | |
| | Southwest - Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada and Texas. |
Across our market areas, we have operated under a number of different retail brands. We currently operate under seven retail brands. During 2019, we began consolidating our brands and billing systems Through the remainder of 2019, we expect to further consolidate our brands and systems as we simplify our business in an effort to simplify our business operations where practical. Our goal is to continue our efforts to reduce the number of separate brands throughout 2020.
33
Table of Contents
Drivers of our Business
The success of our business and our profitability are impacted by a number of drivers, the most significant of which are discussed below.
Customer Growth
45
Table of Contents
Customer growth is a key driver of our operations. Our ability to acquire customers organically or by acquisition is important to our success as we experience ongoing customer attrition. Our customer growth strategy includes growing organically through traditional sales channels complemented by customer portfolio and business acquisitions.
Organic Sales
Our organic sales strategies are designed to offer competitive pricing, price certainty, and/or green product offerings to residential and commercial customers. We manage growth on a market-by-market basis by developing price curves in each of the markets we serve and comparing the market prices to the price offered by the local regulated utility. We then determine if there is an opportunity in a particular market based on our ability to create a competitive product on economic terms that provides customer value and satisfies our profitability objectives. We develop marketing campaigns using a combination of sales channels. Our marketing team continuously evaluates the effectiveness of each customer acquisition channel and makes adjustments in order to achieve desired targets. During the first quarter of 2020, we added approximately 21,000 RCEs through our various organic sales channels.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain Public Utility Commissions, regulatory agencies, and other governmental authorities in all of our markets have issued orders prohibiting energy services companies from door-to-door marketing during the pandemic, which has restricted one of the manners we use to market for organic sales. The Company has ceased door-to-door marketing activities in all markets regardless of states' regulations and is unable to predict when we will resume door-to-door marketing. This may cause our customer book to decrease if we are unable to replace customer attrition in the ordinary course of business through other marketing channels, such as online and telemarketing. We are unable to predict the ultimate effect of these orders on our organic sales at this time. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
Acquisitions
We acquire companies and portfolios of customers through both external and affiliated channels. During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we added approximately 33,000 RCEs as part of our customer portfolio acquisition from Starion Energy, which closed during 2018.
Our ability to realize returns from acquisitions that are acceptable to us is dependent on our ability to successfully identify, negotiate, finance and integrate acquisitions.
Customer Acquisition Costs
Managing customer acquisition costs is a key component of our profitability. Customer acquisition costs are those costs related to obtaining customers organically and do not include the cost of acquiring customers through acquisitions, which are recorded as customer relationships.
We strive to maintain a disciplined approach to recovery of our customer acquisition costs within a 12 month period. We capitalize and amortize our customer acquisition costs over a two year period, which is based on our estimate of the expected average length of a customer relationship. We factor in the recovery of customer acquisition costs in determining which markets we enter and the pricing of our products in those markets. Accordingly, our results are significantly influenced by our customer acquisition costs. Changes in customer acquisition costs from period to period reflect our focus on growing organically versus growth through acquisitions. We are currently focused on growing through organic sales channels; however, we continue to evaluate
34
Table of Contents
opportunities to acquire customers through acquisitions and pursue such acquisitions when it makes sense economically or strategically for the Company.
As described above, certain Public Utility Commissions, regulatory agencies, and other governmental authorities in all of our markets have issued orders that impact the way we have historically acquired customers, such as door to door marketing. Accordingly, as long as these orders are in effect, we expect to incur reduced costs for those door to door marketing activities. However, we may incur increased costs through other manners of marketing. We are unable to predict the ultimate impact of these orders on our customer acquisition costs at this time. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report."
Customer Attrition
Customer attrition occurs primarily as a result of: (i) customer initiated switches; (ii) residential moves and (iii) disconnection resulting from customer payment defaults and (iv) pro-active non-renewal of contracts. Average monthly customer attrition for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was 4.0% and 4.0%, respectively.and average monthly customer attrition for The nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was 4.4% and 4.0%, respectively. Consistent with our previously communicated strategy to shrink our C&I customer book, our customer attrition was slightly higher than the prior year because of our pro-active non-renewal of some of our large commercial contracts.March 31, 2020 and 2019 was 5.7% and 5.4%, respectively.
The current COVID-19 pandemic has caused regulatory agencies and other governmental authorities to take, and potentially continue to take, emergency or other actions in light of the pandemic that may impact our overall customer attrition, including prohibiting the termination of service for non-payment during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Those orders may cause our attrition to be lower than what it would be otherwise. We are unable to predict the ultimate impact of these actions on overall customer attrition at this time. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
Customer Credit Risk
46
Table of Contents
Our bad debt expense for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was 2.7% and 2.8%, respectively, and our bad debt expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was 3.4% and 3.2%, respectively, of non-purchase of receivable market ("non-POR") revenues. We experienced higher bad debt expense in third quarter of 2019, compared with the 2018 period, as a result of accounts receivable adjustments subsequent to our brand consolidations. in addition, as our geographic and acquisition channel mix has changed, our bad debt expense has increased. in order to manage this exposure in 2019, we have increased our focus on: collection efforts, timely billing, and credit monitoring for new enrollments in non-POR markets.March 31, 2020 and 2019 was 3.3% and 4.2%, respectively, for non-purchase of receivable market ("non-POR") revenues. An increased focus on collection efforts, timely billing and credit monitoring for new enrollments in non-POR markets in late 2019 have led to an improvement in the bad debt expense over the past several months. We have also been able to collect on debts that were previously written off, which have further reduced our bad debt expense during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
The current COVID-19 pandemic has caused regulatory agencies and other governmental authorities to take, and potentially continue to take, emergency or other actions in light of the pandemic that may impact our customer credit risk, including prohibiting the termination of service for non-payment during the current COVID-19 pandemic, requiring deferred payment plans for certain customers unable to pay their bill, and utilities increasing POR fees they charge us in an effort to recoup their bad debts losses. Because of the time lag between the delivery of electricity and natural gas, the issuance of an invoice, and the customer's payment due date, there may be a substantial lag in time before we are able to determine specific trends in bad debt expense as a result of COVID-19. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
Weather Conditions
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for natural gas and electricity and affect the prices of energy commodities. Our hedging strategy is based on forecasted customer energy usage, which can vary substantially as a result of weather patterns deviating from historical norms. We are particularly sensitive to this variability in our residential customer segment where energy usage is highly sensitive to weather conditions that impact heating and cooling demand.
Our risk management policies direct that we hedge substantially all of our forecasted demand, which is typically hedged to long-term normal weather patterns. We also attempt to add additional protection through hedging from time to time to protect us from potential volatility in markets where we have historically experienced higher exposure to extreme weather conditions. Because we attempt to match commodity purchases to anticipated demand,
35
Table of Contents
unanticipated changes in weather patterns can have a significant impact on our operating results and cash flows from period to period.
During the third quarter of 2019, we experienced warmer than normal weather During the first quarter of 2020, we experienced a milder than anticipated winter season across many of our markets, which negatively impacted overall customer usage. This was offset by that was offset by increased margins as a result of the shift away from C&I customers to a primarily residential customer base and lower commodity prices due to reduced demand for commodities during the period. increased demand for electricity from our customer base In anticipation of increased demand and volatility in ERCOT, we purchased additional power to mitigate the volatility risk observed in late August and early September of 2019. These factors had a positive impact on our electricity and natural unit margins in the first quarter of 2020.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are experiencing changes in customer demand that we cannot fully anticipate. While not weather related, these changes in demand may lead us to experience financial gains and/or losses in much the same fashion as a weather event as the current circumstances make it more difficult to accurately predict demand. While we continue to conduct analytics on our customer base to anticipate these changes in demand, we cannot predict how the COVID-19 pandemic will ultimately impact our hedging strategy with regard to our load forecasts. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
Asset Optimization
Our asset optimization opportunities primarily arise during the winter heating season when demand for natural gas is typically at its highest. Given the opportunistic nature of these activities and because we account for these activities using the mark to market method of accounting, we experience variability in our earnings from our asset optimization activities from year to year.
Net asset optimization resulted in a gain of $0.3 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively.March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Non-GAAP Performance Measures
We use the non-GAAP performance measures of Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin to evaluate and measure our operating results as follows:
| |
| | | | | | | | || | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 || 2018 |
| (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 28,084 | | | $ | 18,611 | | | $ | 66,742 | | | $ | 50,597 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 30,300 | | | $ | 25,063 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 58,182 | | | $ | 45,795 | | | $ | 156,483 | | | $ | 134,939 | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 55,461 | | | $ | 56,577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Adjusted EBITDA. We define "Adjusted EBITDA" as EBITDA less (i) customer acquisition costs incurred in the current period, plus or minus (ii) net (loss) gain on derivative instruments, and (iii) net current period cash settlements on derivative instruments, plus (iv) non-cash compensation expense, and (v) other non-cash and non-
47
Table of Contents
non-recurring operating items. EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before the provision for income taxes, interest expense and depreciation and amortization.
We deduct all current period customer acquisition costs (representing spending for organic customer acquisitions) in the Adjusted EBITDA calculation because such costs reflect a cash outlay in the period in which they are incurred, even though we capitalize and amortize such costs over two years. We do not deduct the cost of customer acquisitions through acquisitions of businesses or portfolios of customers in calculating Adjusted EBITDA.
We deduct our net (losses) gains on derivative instruments, excluding current period cash settlements, from the Adjusted EBITDA calculation in order to remove the non-cash impact of net gains and losses on these instruments. We also deduct non-cash compensation expense that results from the issuance of restricted stock units under our long-term incentive plan due to the non-cash nature of the expense. Finally, we also adjust from time to time other non-cash or unusual and/or infrequent charges due to either their non-cash nature or their infrequency.
36
Table of Contents
We believe that the presentation of Adjusted EBITDA provides information useful to investors in assessing our liquidity and financial condition and results of operations and that Adjusted EBITDA is also useful to investors as a financial indicator of our ability to incur and service debt, pay dividends and fund capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental financial measure that management and external users of our condensed consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investors, commercial banks and rating agencies, use to assess the following:
| | |
| | our operating performance as compared to other publicly traded companies in the retail energy industry, without regard to financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis; |
| | |
| | the ability of our assets to generate earnings sufficient to support our proposed cash dividends; |
| | |
| | our ability to fund capital expenditures (including customer acquisition costs) and incur and service debt; and |
| | |
| | our compliance with financial debt covenants. (Refer to Note 9 "Debt" to Part I, Item 1 of this Report for discussion of the material terms of our Senior Credit Facility, including the covenant requirements for our Minimum Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio, Maximum Total Leverage Ratio, and Maximum Senior Secured Leverage Ratio.) |
The GAAP measures most directly comparable to Adjusted EBITDA are net (loss) income and net cash provided by (used in) operating activities. The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to these GAAP measures for each of the periods indicated.
48
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 || 2018 |
| (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to Net income: | | | | | | | |
| | | | || | | |
| Net income | $ | 37,676 | | | $ | 18,827 | | | $ | 14,937 | | | $ | 923 | |
| Net income | $ | 10,068 | | | $ | 2,745 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,496 | | | 13,917 | | | 31,963 | | | 39,797 | |8,796 | | | 12,155 | |
| | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 2,174 | | | 2,762 | | | 6,392 | | | 7,323 | |
| Interest expense | 1,553 | | | 2,223 | |
| | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | 6,567 | | | 3,818 | | | 3,022 | | | 602 | |
| Income tax expense | 1,925 | | | 1,041 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| EBITDA | 55,913 | | | 39,324 | | | 56,314 | | | 48,645 | |
| EBITDA | 22,342 | | | 18,164 | |
| | | | | | |
| Less: | | | | | | | |
| | | | || | | |
| Net, gain (loss) on derivative instruments | 12,307 | | | 18,117 | | | (42,690 | ) | | (1,371 | ) |
| Net, loss on derivative instruments | (24,587 | ) | | (19,541 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash settlements on derivative instruments | 12,721 | | | 922 | | | 33,515 | | | (5,823 | ) |16,608 | | | 8,025 | |
| | | | | | |
| Customer acquisition costs | 4,423 | | | 2,695 | | | 13,608 | | | 8,949 | |
| Customer acquisition costs | 1,345 | | | 5,789 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Plus: | | | | | |
| | | | | | | || | | | |
| Non-cash compensation expense | 1,622 | | | 1,021 | | | 4,054 | | | 3,707 | |
1,324 | | | 1,172 | |
| Non-recurring legal and regulatory settlements | - | | | - | | | 10,807 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 28,084 | | | $ | 18,611 | | | $ | 66,742 | | | $ | 50,597 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 30,300 | | | $ | 25,063 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table presents a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities for each of the periods indicated.
37
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 || 2018 |
| (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | |
| | | | | || | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 26,056 | | | $ | 5,443 | | | $ | 77,085 | | | $ | 41,853 | |39,389 | | | $ | 30,049 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of deferred financing costs | (497 | ) | | (631 | ) | | (1,002 | ) | | (1,243 | ) |(250 | ) | | (268 | ) |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Bad debt expense | (3,170 | ) | | (2,755 | ) | | (9,185 | ) | | (8,480 | ) |
| Bad debt expense | (2,355 | ) | | (3,849 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Interest expense | 2,174 | | | 2,762 | | | 6,392 | | | 7,323 | |
| Interest expense | 1,553 | | | 2,223 | |
| | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | 6,567 | | | 3,818 | | | 3,022 | | | 602 | |
| Income tax expense | 1,925 | | | 1,041 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Changes in operating working capital | | | || | | |
| | | | |
| Accounts receivable, prepaids, current assets | 1,034 | | | 16,248 | | | (50,358 | ) | | (9,640 | ) |(17,975 | ) | | (10,364 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Inventory | 1,560 | | | 2,218 | | | (298 | ) | | (475 | ) |
| Inventory | (2,690 | ) | | (3,643 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | || |
| Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (963 | ) | | (5,946 | ) | | 30,209 | | | 17,988 | |10,818 | | | 10,950 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | ||
| Other | (4,677 | ) | | (2,546 | ) || 10,877 | | | 2,669 | |
| Other | (115 | ) | | (1,076 | ) |
| | | | | | | || | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 28,084 | | | $ | 18,611 | | | $ | 66,742 | | | $ | 50,597 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA | $ | 30,300 | | | $ | 25,063 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Cash Flow Data: | | | |
| | | | | || | |
| Cash flows provided by operating activities | $ | 26,056 | | | $ | 5,443 | | | $ | 77,085 | | | $ | 41,853 | |39,389 | | | $ | 30,049 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows used in investing activities | $ | (536 | ) | | $ | 307 | | | $ | (6,490 | ) | | $ | (23,693 | ) |(6,123 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash flows (used in provided by financing activities | $ | (10,937 | ) | | $ | 1,344 | | | $ | (76,651 | ) | | $ | (4,783 | ) |
| Cash flows used in financing activities | $ | (41,050 | ) | | $ | (38,361 | ) |
| | | | | | | | |
49
Table of Contents
Retail Gross Margin. We define retail gross margin as operating income (loss) plus (i) depreciation and amortization expenses and (ii) general and administrative expenses, less (iii) net asset optimization (expenses) revenues, (iv) net gains (losses) on non-trading derivative instruments, and (v) net current period cash settlements on non-trading derivative instruments. Retail gross margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a primary performance measure used by our management to determine the performance of our retail natural gas and electricity segments. As an indicator of our retail energy business's operating performance, retail gross margin should not be considered an alternative to, or more meaningful than, operating income (loss), its most directly comparable financial measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP.
We believe retail gross margin provides information useful to investors as an indicator of our retail energy business's operating performance.
The GAAP measure most directly comparable to Retail Gross Margin is operating income (loss). The following table presents a reconciliation of Retail Gross Margin to operating income (loss) for each of the periods indicated.
38
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | || | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 || 2018 |
| (in thousands) | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Reconciliation of Retail Gross Margin to Operating income: | | | |
| | | | | || | |
| Operating income | $ | 46,095 | | | $ | 25,454 | | | $ | 23,346 | | | $ | 8,141 | |
| Operating income | $ | 13,386 | | | $ | 5,820 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Plus: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 9,496 | | | 13,917 | | | 31,963 | | | 39,797 | |8,796 | | | 12,155 | |
| | | | | | |
| General and administrative expense | 27,629 | | | 25,695 | | | 94,352 | | | 83,522 | |25,676 | | | 29,476 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Less: | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization (expenses) revenues | (254 | ) | | 348 | | | 2,242 | | | 3,798 | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | 321 | | | 2,552 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Loss on non-trading derivative instruments | 12,528 | | | 17,888 | | | (42,741 | ) | | (2,223 | ) |(24,533 | ) | | (19,803 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | ||
| Net, Cash settlements on non-trading derivative instruments | 12,764 | | | 1,035 | | | 33,677 | | |(5,054 | ) |16,609 | | | 8,125 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 58,182 | | | $ | 45,795 | | | $ | 156,483 | | | $ | 134,939 | |
| Retail Gross Margin | $ | 55,461 | | | $ | 56,577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin - Retail Electricity Segment | $ | 53,143 | | | $ | 40,252 | | | $ | 116,730 | | | $ | 92,613 | |30,806 | | | $ | 29,973 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin - Retail Natural Gas Segment | $ | 5,039 | | | $ | 5,543 | | | $ | 39,753 | | | $ | 42,326 | |24,655 | | | $ | 26,604 | |
| | | | | | | | |
Our non-GAAP financial measures of Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin should not be considered as alternatives to net income (loss), net cash provided by (used in) operating activities, or operating income (loss). Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP and have limitations as analytical tools. You should not consider Adjusted EBITDA or Retail Gross Margin in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin exclude some, but not all, items that affect net income (loss), net cash provided by operating activities, and operating income (loss), and are defined differently by different companies in our industry, our definition of Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.
Management compensates for the limitations of Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin as analytical tools by reviewing the comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between the measures and incorporating these data points into management's decision-making process.
39
Table of Contents
Consolidated Results of Operations
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| (In Thousands) | Three Months Ended March 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | |
| Revenues: | | | |
| | | | |
| Retail revenues | $ | 207,341 | | | $ | 258,127 | |
| Retail revenues | $ | 166,360 | | | $ | 240,154 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization (expense) revenues | 321 | | | 2,552 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total Revenues | 207,087 | | | 258,475 | |
| Total Revenues | 166,681 | | | 242,706 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 123,867 | | | 193,409 | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 118,823 | | | 195,255 | |
| | | | | | |
| General and administrative expense | 25,676 | | | 29,476 | |
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 8,796 | | | 12,155 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total Operating Expenses | 153,295 | | | 236,886 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating income | 46,095 | | | 25,454 | |
| Operating income | 13,386 | | | 5,820 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other (expense)/income: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Interest expense | (2,174 | ) | | (2,762 | ) |
| Interest expense | (1,553 | ) | | (2,223 | ) |
| Interest and other income | 160 | | | 189 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total other expense | (1,852 | ) | | (2,809 | ) |
| Total other expense | (1,393 | ) | | (2,034 | ) |
| Income before income tax expense | 11,993 | | | 3,786 | |
| | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | 6,567 | | | 3,818 | |
| Income tax expense | 1,925 | | | 1,041 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 37,676 | | | $ | 18,827 | |
| Net income | $ | 10,068 | | | $ | 2,745 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Other Performance Metrics: | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA (1) | $ | 28,084 | | | $ | 18,611 | |
| Adjusted EBITDA (1) | $ | 30,300 | | | $ | 25,063 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin (1) | $ | 55,461 | | | $ | 56,577 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Customer Acquisition Costs | $ | 1,345 | | | $ | 5,789 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Average Monthly RCE Attrition | 5.7 | % | | 5.4 | % |
(1) Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin are non-GAAP financial measures. See " - Non-GAAP Performance Measures" for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin to their most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
Total Revenues. Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2020 were approximately $166.7 million, a decrease of approximately $76.0 million, or 31%, from approximately $242.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, as indicated in the table below (in millions). This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in electricity and natural gas volumes as a result of milder weather and a smaller C&I customer book in the first quarter of 2020 as compared to the first quarter of 2019, partially offset by an increase in electricity unit revenue per MWh.
| |
| | | | |
| Change in electricity volumes sold | $ | (67.1 | ) |
| Change in natural gas volumes sold | (13.9 | ) |
| Change in electricity unit revenue per MWh | 6.8 | |
| | | |
| Change in natural gas unit revenue per MMBtu | 0.4 | |
| | | |
| Change in net asset optimization revenue | (2.2 | ) |
| Change in total revenues | $ | (76.0 | ) |
Retail Cost of Revenues. Total retail cost of revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $123.9 March 31, 2020 was approximately $118.8 million, a decrease of approximately $76.5 million, or 39%, from approximately $195.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, as indicated in the table below (in millions). This decrease was primarily due to a
40
Table of Contents
was primarily due to a decrease in electricity and natural gas volumes as a result of milder weather and a smaller C&I customer book in 2020, a decrease in natural gas and a smaller C&I customer book in 2019, a decrease in electricity unit cost per MWh and a change in the fair value of our retail derivative portfolio.
| |
| | | | |
| Change in electricity volumes sold | $ | (56.0 | ) |
| Change in natural gas volumes sold | (7.6 | ) |
| Change in electricity unit cost per MWh | (5.2 | ) |
| Change in natural gas unit cost per MMBtu | 0.2 | |
(4.0 | ) |
| Change in value of retail derivative portfolio | (3.7 | ) |
| Change in retail cost of revenues | $ | (76.5 | ) |
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $27.6 million, an increase March 31, 2020 was approximately $25.7 million, a decrease of approximately $3.8 million, or 13%, as compared to $29.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was primarily attributable to increased litigation expense in third quarter of 2019.March 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in bad debt expense due to increased collection efforts, timely billing and credit monitoring, decrease in sales and marketing costs due to limitation of our door-to-door strategy, offset by an increase in legal fees in the first quarter of 2020.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $9.5 million, a decrease of approximately $4.4 million, or 32%, from approximately $13.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. This decrease was primarily due to the decreased amortization expense associated with customer intangibles.
Customer Acquisition Cost. Customer acquisition cost for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $4.4 million, an increase of approximately $1.7 million, or 64%, from approximately $2.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of organic sales in 2019 as compared to 2018, as we had slowed our organic sales in 2018 to concentrate on acquisitions of companies and portfolios of customers.
52
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| (In Thousands) | Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| | | | |
| Revenues: | | | |
| | | | |
| Retail revenues | $ | 625,300 | | | $ | 773,616 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net asset optimization revenues | 2,242 | | | 3,798 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total Revenues | 627,542 | | | 777,414 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Retail cost of revenues | 477,881 | | | 645,954 | |
| | | | | | |
| General and administrative | 94,352 | | | 83,522 | |
| | | | | | |
| Depreciation and amortization | 31,963 | | | 39,797 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total Operating Expenses | 604,196 | | | 769,273 | |
| | | | | | |
| Operating income | 23,346 | | | 8,141 | |
| | | | | | |
| Other (expense)/income: | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Interest expense | (6,392 | ) | | (7,323 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Interest and other income | 1,005 | | | 707 | |
| | | | | | |
| Total other expense | (5,387 | ) | | (6,616 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | 17,959 | | | 1,525 | |
| | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | 3,022 | | | 602 | |
| | | | | | |
| Net income | $ | 14,937 | | | $ | 923 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Other Performance Metrics: | | | |
| Adjusted EBITDA (1) | $ | 66,742 | | | $ | 50,597 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin (1) | $ | 156,483 | | | $ | 134,939 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Customer Acquisition costs | $ | 13,608 | | | $ | 8,949 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| RCE Attrition | 4.4 | % | | 4.0 | % |
| | | | | | |
(1) Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin are non GAAP financial measures. See " - Non-GAAP Performance Measures" for a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA and Retail Gross Margin to their most directly comparable financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP.
Total Revenues. Total revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were approximately $627.5 million, a decrease of approximately $149.9 million, or 19%, from approximately $777.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, as indicated in the table below (in millions). This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in electricity and natural gas volumes as a result of a smaller C&I customer book in 2019 as compared to 2018, partially offset by an increase in electricity unit revenue per MWh.
| |
| | | | |
| Change in electricity volumes sold | $ | (172.7 | ) |
| Change in natural gas volumes sold | (14.6 | ) |
| Change in electricity unit revenue per MWh | 36.1 | |
| | | |
| Change in natural gas unit revenue per MMBtu | 2.9 | |
| | | |
| Change in net asset optimization revenue (expense) | (1.6 | ) |
| Change in total revenues | $ | (149.9 | ) |
Retail Cost of Revenues. Total retail cost of revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $477.9 million, a decrease of approximately $168.1 million, or 26%, from approximately $646.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, as indicated in the table below (in millions). This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in electricity and natural gas volumes as a result of a smaller C&I customer book in
53
Table of Contents
2019 and, a decrease in electricity unit cost per MWh, partially offset by a change in fair value of our retail derivative portfolio.
| |
| | | | |
| Change in electricity volumes sold | $ | (149.1 | ) |
| Change in natural gas volumes sold | (8.2 | ) |
| Change in electricity unit cost per MWh | (11.6 | ) |
| Change in natural gas unit cost per MMBtu | (0.9 | ) |
| Change in value of retail derivative portfolio | 1.7 | |
| | | |
| Change in retail cost of revenues | $ | (168.1 | ) |
General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $94.3 million, an increase of approximately $10.8 million, or 13%, as compared to $83.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was primarily attributable to non-recurring legal and regulatory settlements and increased litigation expense in the second quarter of 2019.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $8.8 million, a decrease of approximately $3.4 million, or 28%, from approximately $12.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to the decreased amortization expense associated with customer relationship intangibles.
Customer Acquisition Cost. Customer acquisition cost for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $13.6 million, an increase three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $1.3 million, a decrease of approximately $4.5 million, or 78%, from approximately $5.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was primarily due to an increase in the number of organic sales in 2019 as compared to 2018, as we had slowed our organic sales in 2018 to concentrate on acquisitions of companies and portfolios of customers.three months ended March 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in organic customer acquisitions as we make efforts to improve our organic sales channels, including vendor selection and sales quality.
41
Table of Contents
Operating Segment Results
| |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended || Nine Months Ended |
| | March 31, |
| | 2020 | | 2019 |
| | | | || | | |
| | (in thousands, except volume and per unit operating data) |
| Retail Electricity Segment | | | |
| | | | |
| Total Revenues | $ | 197,010 | | | $ | 246,182 | | | $ | 539,878 | Total Revenues | $ | 121,768 | | | | $ | 182,092 | |
| | | | | | | | || | | | | | | |
| Retail Cost of Revenues | 119,100 | | | 186,449 | | | 433,175 | | | 587,949 | |
| Retail Cost of Revenues | 100,383 | | | 165,888 | |
| | | | | | |
| Less: Net loss on non-trading derivatives, net of cash settlements | 24,767 | | | 19,481 | | | (10,027 | ) | | (4,034 | ) |(9,421 | ) | | (13,769 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin (1) - Electricity | $ | 53,143 | | | $ | 40,252 | | | $ | 116,730 | | | $ | 92,613 | |30,806 | | | $ | 29,973 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Volumes - Electricity (MWhs) | 1,808,276 | | | 2,432,314 | | | 5,052,498 | | | 6,784,345 | |1,091,425 | | | 1,728,083 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin (2) - Electricity per MWh | $ | 29.39 | | | $ | 16.55 | | | $ | 23.10 | | | $ | 13.65 | |28.23 | | | $ | 17.35 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | |
| Retail Natural Gas Segment | | | | | | | |
| | | | || | | |
| Total Revenues | $ | 10,331 | | | $ | 11,945 | | | $ | 85,422 | Total Revenues | $ | 44,592 | | | | $ | 58,062 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Retail Cost of Revenues | 4,767 | | | 6,960 | | | 44,706 | | | 58,005 | |
| Retail Cost of Revenues | 18,440 | | | 29,367 | |
| | | | | | |
| Less: Net gain (loss) on non-trading derivatives, net of cash settlements | 525 | | | (558 | ) | | 963 | | | (3,243 | ) |1,497 | | | 2,091 | |
| | | | | | | || | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin (1) - Gas | $ | 5,039 | | | $ | 5,543 | | | $ | 39,753 | | | $ | 42,326 | |24,655 | | | $ | 26,604 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Volumes - Gas (MMBtus) | 1,119,126 | | | 1,395,377 | | | 10,127,857 | | | 11,913,180 | |
| Volumes - Gas (MMBtus) | 5,282,299 | | | 6,951,610 | |
| | | | | | || | | | | |
| Retail Gross Margin (2) - Gas per MMBtu | $ | 4.50 | | | $ | 3.97 | | | $ | 3.93 | | | $ | 3.55 | |4.67 | | | $ | 3.83 | |
| | | | | | | | |
(1) Reflects the Retail Gross Margin attributable to our Retail Electricity Segment or Retail Natural Gas Segment, as applicable. Retail Gross Margin is a non-GAAP financial measure. See " -Non-GAAP Performance Measures" for a reconciliation of Retail Gross Margin to most directly comparable financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP.
(2) Reflects the Retail Gross Margin for the Retail Electricity Segment or Retail Natural Gas Segment, as applicable, divided by the total volumes in MWh or MMBtu, respectively.
Three Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2018
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Retail Electricity Segment
Total revenues for the Retail Electricity Segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 were approximately $121.8 million, a decrease of approximately $60.3 million, or 33%, from approximately $182.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. This decrease was largely due to lower volumes sold, resulting in a decrease of $67.1 million as a result of milder weather and a smaller C&I customer book in 2020. This decrease was partially offset by higher retail electricity prices as a result of the decrease of C&I RCEs as a total percentage of our customer book, which resulted in an increase of $6.8 million.
Retail cost of revenues for the Retail Electricity Segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 were approximately $100.4 million, a decrease of approximately $65.5 million, or 39%, from approximately $165.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to fewer C&I customers, resulting in a decrease of $56.0 million, a decrease in supply costs of $5.2 million, and a change in the value of our retail derivative portfolio used for hedging, which resulted in a decrease of $4.3 million.
Retail gross margin for the Retail Electricity Segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $30.8 million, an increase of approximately $0.8 million, or 3%, from approximately $30.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, as indicated in the table below (in millions).
55
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | |
| Change in volumes sold | $ | (11.0 | ) |
| Change in unit margin per MWh | 11.8 | |
| | | |
| Change in retail electricity segment retail gross margin | $ | 0.8 | |
| | | | |
42
Table of Contents
Retail Natural Gas Segment
Total revenues for the Retail Natural Gas Segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 were approximately $44.6 million, a decrease of approximately $13.5 million, or 23%, from approximately $58.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower volumes sold, which decreased total revenues by $13.9 million, offset by an increase in retail natural gas rates, which resulted in an increase in total revenues of $0.4 million.
Retail cost of revenues for the Retail Natural Gas Segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 were approximately $18.4 million, a decrease of $11.0 million, or 37%, from approximately $29.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019. This decrease was primarily due to lower volumes resulting in a decrease of $1.3 million, a change in the value of our derivative portfolio used for hedging, which resulted in a decrease of $1.1 million, offset by higher $7.6 million, lower natural gas prices, which resulted in an increase of $0.2 million.
Retail gross margin for the Retail Natural Gas Segment for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $5.0 million, a decrease of approximately $0.5 million, or 9%, from approximately $5.5 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2018, as indicated in the table below (in millions).
a decrease of $4.0 million, offset by
| |
| | | | |
| Change in volumes sold | $ | (1.1 | ) |
| Change in unit margin per MMBtu | 0.6 | |
| | | |
| Change in retail natural gas segment retail gross margin | $ | (0.5 | ) |
56
Table of Contents
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
Retail Electricity Segment
Total revenues for the Retail Electricity Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were approximately $539.9 million, a decrease of approximately $136.6 million, or 20%, from approximately $676.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This decrease was largely due to a decrease in volumes, resulting in a decrease of $172.7 million. This was partially offset by higher weighted average revenue rates, due to our customer mix shifting away from large commercial customers, which resulted in an increase of $36.1 million.
Retail cost of revenues for the Retail Electricity Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $433.2 million, a decrease of approximately $154.7 million, or 26%, from approximately $587.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in volumes, resulting in a decrease of $149.1 million. This decrease was further impacted by decreased electricity prices, which resulted in a decrease in retail cost of revenues of $11.6 million. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of $6.0 million due to a change in the value of our retail derivative portfolio used for hedging,
Retail gross margin for the Retail Electricity Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $116.7 million, an increase of approximately $24.1 million, or 26%, from approximately $92.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, as indicated in the table below (in millions).
| |
| | | | |
| Change in volumes sold | $ | (23.6 | ) |
| Change in unit margin per MWh | 47.7 | |
| | | |
| Change in retail electricity segment retail gross margin | $ | 24.1 | |
| | | | |
Retail Natural Gas Segment
Total revenues for the Retail Natural Gas Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were approximately $85.4 million, a decrease of approximately $11.7 million, or 12%, from approximately $97.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in volumes of $14.6 million, partially offset by higher rates, which resulted in an increase in total revenues of $2.9 million.
which resulted in an increase of $0.6 million.
Retail cost of revenues for the Retail Natural Gas Segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was approximately $44.7 million, a decrease of approximately $13.3 million, or 23%, from approximately $58.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This decrease was due to decreased supply costs of $0.9 million, a decrease of $8.2 million related to decreased volumes, and a $4.2 million change in the fair value of our retail derivative portfolio used for hedging.
Retail gross margin for the Retail Natural Gas Segment for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was approximately $24.7 million, a decrease of approximately $1.9 million, or 7%, from approximately $26.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2019, as indicated in the table below (in millions).
| |
| | | | |
| Change in volumes sold | $ | (6.4 | ) |
| Change in unit margin per MMBtu | 4.5 | |
| | | |
| Change in retail natural gas segment retail gross margin | $ | (1.9 | ) |
43
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash generated from operations and borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility. Our principal liquidity requirements are to meet our financial commitments, finance current operations, fund organic growth and/or acquisitions, service debt and pay dividends. Our liquidity requirements fluctuate with our level of customer acquisition costs, acquisitions, collateral posting requirements on our derivative instruments portfolio, distributions, the effects of the timing between the settlement of payables and receivables, including the effect of bad debts, weather conditions, and our general working capital needs for ongoing operations. We believe that cash generated from operations and our available liquidity sources will be sufficient to sustain current operations and to pay required taxes and quarterly cash distributions, including the quarterly dividends to the holders of the Class A common stock and the Series A Preferred Stock, for the next twelve months. Estimating our liquidity requirements is highly dependent on then-current market conditions, including impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, weather events, forward prices for natural gas and electricity, market volatility and our then existing capital structure and requirements.
We believe that the financing of any additional growth through acquisitions and/or the need for more liquidity in the remainder of 2020 may require further equity or debt financing and/or further expansion of our Senior Credit Facility.
Liquidity Position
The following table details our available liquidity as of March 31, 2020:
| |
| | | | |
| ($ in thousands) | March 31, 2020 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 54,466 | |
| | | | |
| Senior Credit Facility Availability (1) | 72,356 | |
| | | |
| Subordinated Debt Facility Availability (2) | 25,000 | |
| | | |
| Total Liquidity | $ | 151,822 | |
| | | | |
(1) Reflects amount of Letters of Credit that could be issued based on existing covenants as of March 31, 2020.
(2) The availability of the Subordinated Facility is dependent on our Founder's willingness and ability to lend. See "-Sources of Liquidity- Subordinated Debt Facility."
Borrowings and related posting of letters of credit under our Senior Credit Facility are subject to material variations on a seasonal basis due to the timing of commodity purchases to satisfy natural gas inventory requirements and to meet customer demands during periods of peak usage. Additionally, borrowings are subject to borrowing base and covenant restrictions.
For further discussion of our Senior Credit Facility and the Subordinated Debt Facility, see Note 9 "Debt."
Cash Flows
Our cash flows were as follows for the respective periods (in thousands):
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Nine Months Ended September 30, | | |
| | Three Months Ended March 31, | | |
| | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2019 | | Change |
| | | | | | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | $ | 77,085 | | | $ | 41,853 | | | $ | 35,232 | |39,389 | | | $ | 30,049 | | | $ | 9,340 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | $ | (6,490 | ) | | $ | (23,693 | ) | | $ | 17,203 | |(536 | ) | | $ | (6,123 | ) | | $ | 5,587 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | $ | (76,651 | ) | | $ | (4,783 | ) | | $ | (71,868 | ) |(41,050 | ) | | $ | (38,361 | ) | | $ | (2,689 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018
44
Table of Contents
Three Months Ended March 31, 2020 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
58
Table of Contents
Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities. Cash flows provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 increased by $35.2 million compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018. three months ended March 31, 2020 increased by $9.3 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2019. The increase was primarily the result of higher net income in 2020, and a decrease in the changes in working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2020 primarily due to declines in accounts receivable and accounts payable attributable to lower sales and cost of sales during the 2019 period.during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities. Cash flows used in investing activities decreased by $5.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020. The decrease was primarily the result of the amount paid for acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2018.three months ended March 31, 2019 with no corresponding acquisition payments during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
Cash Flows Used in Financing Activities. Cash flows used in financing activities increased by $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020. Cash flows used in financing activities increased primarily due to an increase in distributions to non-controlling interest holders of $3.4 million, offset by a decreased net paydown of our Senior Credit Facility of $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 as well as an increase in payment of TRA liability of $7.6 million and distributions to non-controlling interest holders of $4.4 million primarily due to the settlement of the TRA liability in July 2019. In addition, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we received proceeds from the issuance of Series A Preferred Stock of approximately $48.5 million, which did not reoccur during the nine months ended September 30, 2019.three months ended March 31, 2020 and a decrease of $1.0 million related to a Verde Promissory Note payments made during the three months ended March 31, 2019, which did not reoccur during the three months ended March 31, 2020. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2020, we repurchased $1.2 million of Series A Preferred Stock through our repurchase program, which did not occur during the three months ended March 31, 2019.
Sources of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Senior Credit Facility
As of September 30, 2019, our Senior Credit Facility As of March 31, 2020, we had total commitments of $217.5 million, of which $130.2 million was outstanding, including $35.2 million of outstanding letters of credit. Under the Senior Credit Facility, we have various limits on advances for Working Capital Loans, Letters of Credit and Bridge Loans. The Senior Credit Facility matures on May 19, 2021. For a description of the terms and conditions of our Senior Credit Facility, including descriptions of the interest rate, commitment fee, covenants and terms of default, please see Note 9 "Debt" in the notes to our condensed consolidated financial statements. As of March 31, 2020, we were in compliance with the covenants under our Senior Credit Facility. Based upon existing covenants as of March 31, 2020, we had availability to borrow up to $72.4 million under the Senior Credit Facility.
Amended and Restated Subordinated Debt Facility
Our Subordinated Debt Facility allows us to draw advances in increments of no less than $1.0 million per advance up to $25.0 million. Although we may use the Subordinated Debt Facility from time to time to enhance short term liquidity, we do not view the Subordinated Debt Facility as a material source of liquidity. See Note 9 "Debt" for additional details. As of September 30, 2019, there was $10.5 million March 31, 2020, there was zero outstanding borrowings under the Subordinated Debt Facility, and could borrow up to $25.0 million under the Subordinated Debt Facility, dependent on our Founder's willingness and ability to lend.
Uses of Liquidity and Capital Resources
Repayment of Current Portion of Senior Credit Facility
Our Senior Credit Facility matures in May 2021, and thus, no amounts are due currently. However, due to the revolving nature of the facility, excess cash available is generally used to reduce the balance outstanding, which at March 31, 2020 was $95.0 million. The current variable interest rate on the facility at March 31, 2020 was 4.14%.
Customer Acquisitions
45
Table of Contents
Our customer acquisition strategy consists of customer growth obtained through organic customer additions as well as opportunistic acquisitions. During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, we spent a total of $1.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively, on organic customer acquisitions. During the nine months ended September
59
Table of Contents
30, 2019 and 2018, we spent a total of $13.6 million and $8.9 million, respectively, on organic customer acquisitions.
Our ability to grow our customer base organically or by acquisition is important to our success as we experience ongoing customer attrition each period.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital requirements each year are relatively low and generally consist of minor purchases of equipment or information system upgrades and improvements. Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 included $0.6 millionthree months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 included $0.5 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to information systems improvements.
Dividends and Distributions
During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, During the three months ended March 31, 2020, we paid dividends to holders of our Class A common stock for the quarter ended December 31, 2019 of approximately $0.18125 per share or $2.6 million in the aggregate. In order to pay our stated dividends to holders of our Class A common stock, our subsidiary, Spark HoldCo is required to make corresponding distributions to holders of its units, including those holders that own our Class B common stock (our non-controlling interest holder). As a result, during the three months ended March 31, 2020, Spark HoldCo made corresponding distributions of $3.8 million to our non-controlling interest holders.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, we paid $6.1 For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we paid $2.0 million related to dividends to holders of Series A Preferred Stock. As of March 31, 2020, we had accrued $2.0 million related to dividends to holders of our Series A Preferred Stock, which was paid on April 15, 2020. For the full year ended December 31, 2019, we anticipate Series A Preferred Stock dividends of $2.1875 per share, or $8.1 2020, at the stated dividend rate of the Series A Preferred Stock of $2.1875 per share, we would be required to pay dividends of $7.9 million in the aggregate based on the Series A Preferred Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2020.
On April 21, 2020, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18125 per share of the Class A common stock and $0.546875 for the Series A Preferred Stock for the first quarter of 2020. Dividends on Class A common stock will be paid on December 16, 2019 to the holders of record as of December 2, 2019, June 15, 2020 to the holders of record as of June 1, 2020, and Series A Preferred Stock dividends will be paid on July 15, 2020 to the holders of record as of July 1, 2020.
Our ability to pay dividends in the future will depend on many factors, including potential impacts of COVID-19, the performance of our business and restrictions under our Senior Credit Facility. If our business does not generate sufficient cash for Spark HoldCo to make distributions to us to fund our Class A common stock and Series A Preferred Stock dividends, we may have to borrow to pay such amounts or temporarily suspend the dividends. Further, even if our business generates cash in excess of our current annual dividend (of $0.725 per share on our Class A common stock), we may reinvest such excess cash flows in our business and not increase the dividends payable to holders of our Class A common stock. Our future dividend policy is within the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon the results of our operations, our financial condition, capital requirements and investment opportunities.
Collateral Posting Requirements
Prior to July 11, 2019, we were party to a TRA with affiliates. The TRA was terminated on July 11, 2019. See "- Recent Developments" above. The TRA generally provided for the payment by the Company of 85% of the net cash savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that the Company actually realized (or was deemed to have realized in certain circumstances) in future periods. the Company retained the benefit of the remaining 15% of these tax savings.
Our contractual agreements with certain local regulated utilities and our supplier counterparties require us to maintain restricted cash balances or letters of credit as collateral for credit risk or the performance risk associated with the future delivery of natural gas or electricity. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain local regulated utilities and our supplier counterparties have contacted us inquiring about our financial condition and the impact the pandemic is having on our operations. These inquiries may lead to additional requests for cash or letters of credit in an effort to mitigate the risk of default in paying our obligations related to the future delivery of natural gas or electricity. At this time, we have no way to predict what the local regulated utilities or our supplier counterparties may ask for in terms of additional collateral or how long the increased levels of collateral may endure. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
As of each of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, we had a total liability related to the TRA on our balance sheet of zero and $27.6 million, respectively. In July 2019, we terminated the TRA and paid $11.2 million to settle all obligations related to the TRA. See "- Recent Developments" above for details of the Release Agreement.
Verde Promissory Note
60
Table of Contents
in January 2018, we issued an amended and restated promissory note to the sellers of the Verde Companies (the "Verde Promissory Note"). As of December 31, 2018, there was $1.0 million outstanding under the Verde Promissory Note, all of which was paid in January 2019. The note bore interest at 9% per annum, and we made monthly payments of principal and associated interest, a portion of which was deposited into an escrow account to provide security for certain indemnification claims and obligations under the Verde purchase agreement. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, a total of $5.3 million and $7.6 million, respectively, was held in escrow for such claims.
Verde Earnout Termination Note
In January 2018, we issued a promissory note in the principal amount of $5.9 million in connection with an agreement to terminate the earnout obligations arising in connection with our acquisition of the Verde Companies (the "Verde Earnout Termination Note"). The Verde Earnout Termination Note matured in June 2019 and bore interest at a rate of 9% per annum. Under the terms of the Verde Earnout Termination Note, we were permitted to withhold amounts otherwise due at maturity related to certain indemnifiable matters. A payment of $1.0 million was made to the seller of the Verde Companies in June 2019, and $4.9 million was withheld (the "Verde Holdback") to be applied to indemnifiable matters. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, approximately $0.2 million of the Verde Holdback was applied to costs incurred related to indemnifiable matters. As of September 30, 2019, $4.4 million of the Verde Holdback was classified as accrued liabilities, and $0.3 million was classified as other current liabilities related to indemnifiable matters. Interest was payable monthly on the first day of each month. As of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there was zero and $5.9 million outstanding under the Verde Earnout Termination Note, respectively.
46
Table of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2020, we had no material "off-balance sheet arrangements."
Related Party Transactions
For a discussion of related party transactions, see Note 13 "Transactions with Affiliates" to Part I, Item 1 of this Report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our critical accounting policies and estimates are described in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" in our 2019 Form 10-K. There have been no changes to these policies and estimates since the date of our 2019 Form 10-K.
Refer to Note 2 "Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to Part I, Item 1 of this Report for a discussion on recent accounting pronouncements.
Contingencies
In the ordinary course of business, we may become party to lawsuits, administrative proceedings and governmental investigations, including regulatory and other matters. Except as described in Note 12 "Commitments and Contingencies" to Part I, Item 1 of this Report, as of March 31, 2020, management did not believe that any of our outstanding lawsuits, administrative proceedings or investigations could result in a material adverse effect. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines, penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. For a discussion of the status of current legal and regulatory matters, see Note 12 "Commitments and Contingencies" to Part I, Item 1 of this Report.
47
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market risks relating to our operations result primarily from changes in commodity prices and interest rates, as well as counterparty credit risk. We employ established risk management policies and procedures to manage, measure, and limit our exposure to these risks.
Commodity Price Risk
We hedge and procure our energy requirements from various wholesale energy markets, including both physical and financial markets and through short and long-term contracts. Our financial results are largely dependent on the margin we are able to realize between the wholesale purchase price of natural gas and electricity plus related costs and the retail sales price we charge our customers for these commodities. We actively manage our commodity price risk by entering into various derivative or non-derivative instruments to hedge the variability in future cash flows from fixed-price forecasted sales and purchases of natural gas and electricity in connection with our retail energy operations. These instruments include forwards, futures, swaps, and option contracts traded on various exchanges, such as NYMEX and Intercontinental Exchange, or ICE, as well as over-the-counter markets. These contracts have varying terms and durations, which range from a few days to several years, depending on the instrument. We also utilize similar derivative contracts in connection with our asset optimization activities to attempt to generate incremental gross margin by effecting transactions in markets where we have a retail presence. Generally, any such instruments that are entered into to support our retail electricity and natural gas business are categorized as having been entered into for non-trading purposes, and instruments entered into for any other purpose are categorized as having been entered into for trading purposes.
Our net loss on our non-trading derivative instruments, net of cash settlements, was $7.9 million and $11.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and $(9.1) million and $(7.3) million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018, respectively.March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
We have adopted risk management policies to measure and limit market risk associated with our fixed-price portfolio and our hedging activities. For additional information regarding our commodity price risk and our risk management policies, see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in our 2019 Form 10-K.
We measure the commodity risk of our non-trading energy derivatives using a sensitivity analysis on our net open position. As of March 31, 2020, our Gas Non-Trading Fixed Price Open Position (hedges net of retail load) was a long position of 32,222 MMBtu. An increase of 10% in the market prices (NYMEX) from their March 31, 2020 levels would have increased the fair market value of our net non-trading energy portfolio by less than $0.1 million. Likewise, a decrease of 10% in the market prices (NYMEX) from their March 31, 2020 levels would have decreased the fair market value of our non-trading energy derivatives by less than $0.1 million. As of September 30, 2019, $0.1 million. As of March 31, 2020, our Electricity Non-Trading Fixed Price Open Position (hedges net of retail load) was a short position of 41,474 MWhs. An increase of 10% in the forward market prices from their September 30, 2019 levels would have increased March 31, 2020 levels would have decreased the fair market value of our net non-trading energy portfolio by $0.6 million. Likewise, a decrease of 10% in the forward market prices from their September 30, 2019 levels would have decreased March 31, 2020 levels would have increased the fair market value of our non-trading energy derivatives by $0.6 million.
Credit Risk
In many of the utility services territories where we conduct business, Purchase of Receivables ("POR") programs have been established, whereby the local regulated utility purchases our receivables, and becomes responsible for billing the customer and collecting payment from the customer. This service results in substantially all of our credit risk being with the utility and not to our end-use customer in these territories. Approximately 65% and 66% of our retail revenues were derived from territories in which substantially all of our credit risk was with local regulated utility companies for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and 67% and 68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, and 2018,March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, all of which had investment grade ratings as of such date. During the same period, we paid these local regulated utilities a weighted average discount of approximately 0.9% and 0.9% for the
63
Table of Contents
three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and 0.9% and 1.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, 1.0% and 0.9%, respectively, of total revenues for customer credit risk protection. In
48
Table of Contents
certain of the POR markets in which we operate, the utilities limit their collections exposure by retaining the ability to transfer a delinquent account back to us for collection when collections are past due for a specified period.
If our collection efforts are unsuccessful, we return the account to the local regulated utility for termination of service. Under these service programs, we are exposed to credit risk related to payment for services rendered during the time between when the customer is transferred to us by the local regulated utility and the time we return the customer to the utility for termination of service, which is generally one to two billing periods. We may also realize a loss on fixed-price customers in this scenario due to the fact that we will have already fully hedged the customer's expected commodity usage for the life of the contract.
In non-POR markets (and in POR markets where we may choose to direct bill our customers), we manage customer credit risk through formal credit review in the case of commercial customers, and credit score screening, deposits and disconnection for non-payment, in the case of residential customers. Economic conditions may affect our customers' ability to pay bills in a timely manner, which could increase customer delinquencies and may lead to an increase in bad debt expense. Our bad debt expense for the three months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was approximately 2.7% and 2.8% of non-POR market retail revenues, respectively, and our bad debt expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 was approximately 3.4% and 3.2% March 31, 2020 and 2019 was approximately 3.3% and 4.2% of non-POR market retail revenues, respectively. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Drivers of Our Business-Customer Credit Risk" for an analysis of our bad debt expense related to non-POR markets during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
The current COVID-19 pandemic has caused regulatory agencies and other governmental authorities to take, and potentially continue to take, emergency or other actions in light of the pandemic that may impact our customer credit risk, including prohibiting the termination of service for non-payment during the current COVID-19 pandemic, requiring deferred payment plans for certain customers unable to pay their bill, and utilities increasing POR fees they charge us in an effort to recoup their bad debts losses. Please see "Item 1A-Risk Factors" in this Report.
We are exposed to wholesale counterparty credit risk in our retail and asset optimization activities. We manage this risk at a counterparty level and secure our exposure with collateral or guarantees when needed. At March 31, 2020, approximately $0.1 million of our total exposure of $0.9 million was either with a non-investment grade counterparty or otherwise not secured with collateral or a guarantee. The credit worthiness of the remaining exposure with other customers was evaluated with no material allowance recorded at March 31, 2020.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates under our variable-price debt obligations. At March 31, 2020, we were co-borrowers under the Senior Credit Facility, under which $95.0 million of variable rate indebtedness was outstanding. Based on the average amount of our variable rate indebtedness outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2020, a 1% increase in interest rates would have resulted in additional annual interest expense of approximately $1.1 million.During 2018, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk.$1.0 million.
49
Table of Contents
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2020 at the reasonable assurance level.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) and 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
50
Table of Contents
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
See Note 12 "Commitments and Contingencies" to Part I, Item 1 of this Report, which is incorporated by reference into this Part II, Item 1, for a description of certain ligation, legal proceedings, and regulatory matters.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Security holders and potential investors in our securities should carefully consider the risk factors under "Item 1A- Risk Factors" in our 2018 Form 10-K. and that certain risk factor in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2019 that states: "We cannot guarantee that our Repurchase Program will enhance shareholder value and purchases if any, could increase the volatility of the price of our Series A Preferred Stock," which are incorporated herein by reference.2019 Form 10-K. There has been no material change in our risk factors from those described in the 2018 Form 10-K, and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 20192019 Form 10-K, except as described below. The COVID-19 pandemic could increase the significance of the risks previously disclosed in our 2019 Form 10-K. Our description of risks are not the sole risks for investors. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We face risks related to health epidemics, pandemics and other outbreaks, including COVID-19.
The recent outbreak of COVID-19 is a rapidly developing situation around the globe that has adversely impacted economic activity and conditions worldwide. In particular, efforts to control the spread of COVID-19 have led to shutdowns of various facilities as well as disrupted supply chains around the world. The extent of such impact on our operations is unknown at this time. We are continuing to monitor developments involving our workforce, customers and suppliers and cannot predict whether COVID-19 will have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. However, an extended slowdown of the United States' economic growth, demand for commodities and/or material changes in governmental policy could result in lower economic growth and lower demand for natural gas and electricity in our key markets as well as the ability of various employees, customers, contractors, suppliers and other business partners to fulfill their obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to direct credit risk for certain customers who may fail to pay their bills as they become due.
We bear direct credit risk related to customers located in markets that have not implemented POR programs as well as indirect credit risk in those POR markets that pass collection efforts along to us after a specified non-payment period. As of March 31, 2020, customers in non-POR markets represented approximately 35% of our retail revenues. We generally have the ability to terminate contracts with customers in the event of non-payment, but in most states in which we operate we cannot disconnect their natural gas or electricity service. In POR markets where the local regulated utility has the ability to return non-paying customers to us after specified periods, we may realize a loss for several billing periods until we can terminate these customers' contracts. We may also realize a loss on fixed-price customers in this scenario due to the fact that we will have already fully hedged the customer's expected commodity usage for the life of the contract and we also remain liable to our suppliers of natural gas and electricity for the cost of our supply commodities. Furthermore, in the Texas market, we are responsible for billing the distribution charges for the local regulated utility and are at risk for these charges, in addition to the cost of the commodity, in the event customers fail to pay their bills. Changing economic factors, such as rising unemployment rates and energy prices also result in a higher risk of customers being unable to pay their bills when due.
In addition, the current COVID-19 pandemic has caused regulatory agencies and other governmental authorities to take, and potentially continue to take, emergency or other actions in light of the pandemic that may impact us, including prohibiting the termination of service for non-payment during the current COVID-19 pandemic, requiring deferred payment plans for certain customers unable to pay their bill, and utilities increasing POR fees they charge us in an effort to recoup their bad debts losses. Because of the time lag between the delivery of electricity and natural gas, the issuance of an invoice, and the customer's payment due date, there may be a substantial lag in time before we are able to determine specific trends in bad debt expense as a result of COVID-19. These actions taken by regulatory agencies and governmental authorities may impact our financial results, cash flow and liquidity and
51
Table of Contents
the duration of these changes are unknown. At this time, we are unable to predict the impact that this or other related events may have on our collection efforts due to non-payment.
Our financial results may be adversely impacted by weather conditions; changes in consumer demand.
Weather conditions directly influence the demand for and availability of natural gas and electricity and affect the prices of energy commodities. Generally, on most utility systems, demand for natural gas peaks in the winter and demand for electricity peaks in the summer. Typically, when winters are warmer or summers are cooler, demand for energy is lower than expected, resulting in less natural gas and electricity consumption than forecasted. When demand is below anticipated levels due to weather patterns, we may be forced to sell excess supply at prices below our acquisition cost, which could result in reduced margins or even losses.
Conversely, when winters are colder or summers are warmer, consumption may outpace the volumes of natural gas and electricity against which we have hedged, and we may be unable to meet increased demand with storage or swing supply. In these circumstances, we may experience reduced margins or even losses if we are required to purchase additional supply at higher prices. We may fail to accurately anticipate demand due to fluctuations in weather or to effectively manage our supply in response to a fluctuating commodity price environment.
In addition, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we are experiencing changes in customer demand that we cannot fully anticipate. While not weather related, these changes in demand may lead us to experience financial gains and/or losses in much the same fashion as a weather event as the current circumstances make it more difficult to accurately predict demand. While we continue to conduct analytics on our customer base to anticipate these changes in demand, we cannot predict how the COVID-19 pandemic will ultimately impact our hedging strategy with regard to our load forecasts.
Our access to marketing channels may be contingent upon the viability of our telemarketing and door-to-door agreements with our vendors.
Our vendors are essential to our telemarketing and door-to-door sales activities. Our ability to increase revenues in the future will depend significantly on our access to high quality vendors. If we are unable to attract new vendors and retain existing vendors to achieve our marketing targets, our growth may be materially reduced. There can be no assurance that competitive conditions will allow these vendors and their independent contractors to continue to successfully sign up new customers. Further, if our products are not attractive to, or do not generate sufficient revenue for our vendors, we may lose our existing relationships. In addition, the decline in landlines reduces the number of potential customers that may be reached by our telemarketing efforts and as a result our telemarketing sales channel may become less viable and we may be required to use more door-to-door marketing. Door-to-door marketing is continually under scrutiny by state regulators and legislators, which may lead to new rules and regulations that impact our ability to use these channels.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain Public Utility Commissions, regulatory agencies, and other governmental authorities in all of our markets have issued orders prohibiting energy services companies from door-to-door marketing during the pandemic, which has restricted one of the channels we use to market for organic sales. The Company has ceased door-to-door marketing activities in all markets regardless of states' regulations. This may cause our customer book to decrease if we are unable to replace customer attrition in the ordinary course of business through other marketing channels such as online and telemarketing. We are unable to predict the duration or the impact of the sales moratorium on our financial results, cash flow and liquidity.
Any increased collateral requirements in connection with our supply activities may restrict our liquidity.
Our contractual agreements with certain local regulated utilities and our supplier counterparties require us to maintain restricted cash balances or letters of credit as collateral for credit risk or the performance risk associated with the future delivery of natural gas or electricity. These collateral requirements may increase as we grow our customer base. Collateral requirements will increase based on the volume or cost of the commodity we purchase in
52
Table of Contents
any given month and the amount of capacity or service contracted for with the local regulated utility. Significant changes in market prices also can result in fluctuations in the collateral that local regulated utilities or suppliers require.
In addition, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, certain local regulated utilities and our supplier counterparties have contacted us inquiring about our financial condition and the impact the pandemic is having on our operations. These inquiries may lead to additional requests for cash or letters of credit in an effort to mitigate the risk of default in paying our obligations related to the future delivery of natural gas or electricity. At this time, we have no way to predict what the local regulated utilities or our supplier counterparties may ask for in terms of additional collateral or how long the increased levels of collateral may endure.
The effectiveness of our operations and future growth depend in part on the amount of cash and letters of credit available to enter into or maintain these contracts. The cost of these arrangements may be affected by changes in credit markets, such as interest rate spreads in the cost of financing between different levels of credit ratings. Although we currently have ample liquidity to address any increased collateral requirements, these liquidity requirements may be greater than we anticipate or are able to meet.
Pursuant to our cash dividend policy, we distribute a portion of our cash through regular quarterly dividends on our Class A common stock and Series A Preferred Stock, and our ability to grow and make acquisitions with cash on hand could be limited.
Pursuant to our cash dividend policy, we have historically distributed and intend in the future to distribute, a portion of our cash through regular quarterly dividends to holders of our Class A common stock and dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock. As such, our growth may not be as fast as that of businesses that reinvest their available cash to expand ongoing operations, and we may have to rely upon external financing sources, including the issuance of debt, equity securities, convertible subordinated notes and borrowings under our Senior Credit Facility and Subordinated Facility. These sources may not be available, and our ability to grow and maintain our business may be limited.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we may have liquidity needs that would prevent us from continuing our historical practice as it relates to the payment of dividends on our Class A common stock and Series A Preferred Stock. The primary factors that would lead to a change in the dividend policy would be decreased liquidity due to a decreasing customer book, bad debt associated with the policies adopted by state and regulatory authorities, and increased collateral requirements from suppliers. At this time, we cannot predict the impact the pandemic will have on our ability to continue to pay shareholder dividends.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
There were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2020.
The following table sets forth information regarding purchases of our Series A Preferred Stock by us during the three months ended March 31, 2020 pursuant to our Repurchase Program.
53
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | (a) Total Number of Shares Purchased | | (b) Average Price Paid per Share | | (c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | | (d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
| January 1 - January 31, 2020 | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| August 1 - August 31, 2019 | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| February 1 - February 29, 2020 | 2,822 | | | 25.00 | | | 2,822 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| September 1 - September 30, 2019 | - | | | - | | | - | | | - | |
| March 1 - March 31, 2020 | 66,925 | | | 17.20 | | | 66,925 | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | 69,747 | | | $ | 17.51 | | | 69,747 | | $ | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | ||
(1) On May 22, 2019, the Company announced that the Board of Directors authorized the Repurchase Program to purchase shares of Series A Preferred Stock through May 20, 2020. On November 8, 2019, the Repurchase Program was amended and extended through December 31, 2020. There is no dollar limit on the amount of Series A Preferred Stock that may be purchased. The Repurchase Program does not obligate us to make any repurchases and may be suspended for periods or discontinued at any time.
54
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Item 6. Exhibits |
The exhibits required to be filed by Item 6 are set forth in the Exhibit Index included below.
55
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| INDEX TO EXHIBITS |
| | | | | Incorporated by Reference |
| | | | | |
| Exhibit | | | Exhibit Description | | Form | Exhibit Number | Filing Date | SEC File No. |
| | | | | | | | | |
| 2.1# | | | Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, by and among Spark Energy, Inc., Spark HoldCo, LLC, Provider Power, LLC, Kevin B. Dean and Emile L. Clavet, dated as of May 3, 2016. | | 10-Q | | 2.1 | 5/5/2016 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.2# | | | Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, by and among Spark Energy, Inc., Spark HoldCo, LLC, Retailco, LLC and National Gas & Electric, LLC, dated as of May 3, 2016. | | 10-Q | | 2.2 | 5/5/2016 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.3# | | | Amendment No. 1 to the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2016, by and among Spark Energy, Inc., Spark HoldCo, LLC, Provider Power, LLC, Kevin B. Dean and Emile L. Clavet. | | 8-K | | 2.1 | 8/1/2016 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.4# | | | Membership Interest and Stock Purchase Agreement, by and among Spark Energy, Inc., CenStar Energy Corp. and Verde Energy USA Holdings, LLC, dated as of May 5, 2017. | | 10-Q | | 2.4 | 5/8/2017 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.5 | | | First Amendment to the Membership Interest and Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 1, 2017, by and among Spark Energy, Inc., CenStar Energy Corp., and Verde Energy USA Holdings, LLC. | | 8-K | | 2.1 | 7/6/2017 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.6# | | | Agreement to Terminate Earnout Payments, effective January 12, 2018, by and among Spark Energy, Inc., CenStar Energy Corp., Woden Holdings, LLC (fka Verde Energy USA Holdings, LLC), Verde Energy USA, Inc., Thomas FitzGerald, and Anthony Menchaca. | | 8-K | | 2.1 | 1/16/2018 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.7# | | | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated March 7, 2018, by and between Spark HoldCo, LLC and National Gas & Electric, LLC. | | 10-K | | 2.7 | 3/9/2018 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 2.8# | | | Asset Purchase Agreement, by and between Spark HoldCo, LLC, Starion Energy Inc., Starion Energy NY Inc., and Starion Energy PA Inc., dated October 19, 2018. | | 8-K | | 2.1 | 10/25/2018 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3.1 | | | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Spark Energy, Inc. | | 8-K | | 3.1 | 8/4/2014 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3.2 | | | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Spark Energy, Inc. | | 8-K | | 3.2 | 8/4/2014 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 3.3 | | | Certificate of Designations of Rights and Preferences of 8.75% Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock | | 8-A | | 5 | 3/14/2017 | 001-36559 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 4.1 | | | Class A Common Stock Certificate | | S-1 | | 4.1 | 6/30/2014 | 333-196375 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.1 | | | TRA Termination and Release Agreement, dated July 11, 2019, by and among Spark Energy, Inc. Spark HoldCo, LLC, Retailco, LLC, NuDevco Retail, LLCEmployment Agreement, effective as of March 13, 2020, by and between Spark Energy, Inc. and W. Keith Maxwell III | | 8-K | | 10.1 | 3/19/2020 | 001-36559 |
| 10.2 | | | Indemnification Agreement, dated August 29, 2019, by and among Spark Energy, Inc. and Amanda Bush | | 8-K | | 10.1 | 8/30/2019 | 001-36559 |as of March 17, 2020, by and between Spark Energy, Inc. and Kevin McMinn | | 8-K | | 10.2 | 3/19/2020 | 001-36559 |
| 10.3 | | | Employment Agreement, effective as of March 23, 2020, by and between Spark Energy, Inc. and Kevin McMinn | | 8-K | | 10.1 | 3/25/2020 | 001-36559 |
| 10.4 | | | Transition and Resignation Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims, dated March 19, 2020, by and between Spark Energy, Inc. and Jason Garrett, dated September 25, 2019 | | 8-K | | 10.1 | 9/27/2019 | 001-36559 |Nathan Kroeker | | 8-K | | 10.2 | 3/25/2020 | 001-36559 |
56
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 10.5 | | | Amendment No. 2 to the Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Spark Holdco, LLC, dated as of March 30, 2020, by and between Spark Energy, Inc., Spark HoldCo, LLC, NuDevco Retail, LLC and Retailco, LLC | | 8-K | | 10.1 | 4/3/2020 | 001-36559 |
| 31.1* | | | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
68
Table of Contents
| |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 31.2* | | | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 32** | | | Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.INS* | | | XBRL Instance Document. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.SCH* | | | XBRL Schema Document. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.CAL* | | | XBRL Calculation Document. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.LAB* | | | XBRL Labels Linkbase Document. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.PRE* | | | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| 101.DEF* | | | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document. | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
* Filed herewith
** Furnished herewith
# The registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule to the Commission upon request
Compensatory plan or arrangement
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | Spark Energy, Inc. |
| | | |
| | | | | | |
| May 6, 2020 | | | /s/ James G. Jones II |
| | | | James G. Jones II |
| | | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
57
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, W. Keith Maxwell III, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the "report") on Form 10-Q of Spark Energy, Inc. (the "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2020
/s/ W. Keith Maxwell III
W. Keith Maxwell III
Interim Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(A) AND RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
I, James G. Jones II, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report (the "report") on Form 10-Q of Spark Energy, Inc. (the "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 6, 2020
/s/ James G. Jones II
James G. Jones II
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32
Certification by the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 (the "Report") of Spark Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, W. Keith Maxwell III, Principal Executive Officer of the Company and James G. Jones II, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:
| | |
| 1. | This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
| | |
| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
Date: May 6, 2020
/s/ W. Keith Maxwell III
W. Keith Maxwell III
Interim Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ James G. Jones II
James G. Jones II
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)